Guillermo Del Toro’s Cabinet of Curiosities REVIEW

It’s been a very Guillermo Halloween for me this year, as I watched Crimson Peak for the first time, and have just finished Cabinet of Curiosities (both available on Netflix right now, if you too are so inclined to have a very Guillermo (extended) Halloween (as this review is coming out after Halloween, but c’mon–we can enjoy spooks all year round!)).

So how is the Cabinet?

It’s part strange, part horrifying, part mesmerizing, and all absolutely wonderful. In other words, it’s everything a cabinet of curiosities should be.

General Things

Like del Toro himself explains in the prologue of the first episode, the “cabinets” that the series takes its name from were actually collections of objects that largely originated in the 16th century (though some did exist prior to this–you know, before cabinets were cool). Often they were actually a room of curious items, rather than a cabinet or box (or the funky contraption del Toro uses in the prologue of every episode to introduce the piece).

In many ways, the cabinets were museums–celebrations of the weird and unusual in science and art. Famously, though, some of the objects were faked, such as “mermaids” or other creatures with human skulls and torsos attached for the sake of shock value (or maybe they were real–who’s to say?). At their heart, the cabinets were, as the name suggests, a celebration of our natural curiosity for the world around us and everything in it.

Although the term has been coined in recent years to represent more horrific and fantastical objects rather than a celebration of the wonders of the natural world as is, well…who are we to argue how those two sides can be connected? Is it not horrifying that many species will eat the heads of their mate? Is it not eerie that there are carnivorous plants? Is it not unsettling that more than 80% of the ocean remains unexplored by us?

The point, I suppose, is that while this Cabinet of Curiosities is, at its core, a horror anthology, it does fit in beautifully with the original purpose of those initial cabinets–to celebrate and put on display the weird, the unusual, the strange, the unsettling, and yes, maybe even the real of the world around us.

Every episode is introduced by del Toro himself, as he unlocks a new section or opens a new door of a mysterious cabinet-esque contraption, laying out for us an object that ties in to the story we are about to enjoy, as well as a figurine of the director for each piece. I’ll discuss each episode in both a spoiler-free and spoiler-filled light, just in case you’d like to experience the Cabinet for yourself without fully knowing what lies in wait.

Episode 1: “Lot 36” directed by Guillermo Navarro

just your totally average storage unit, nothing to see here

SPOILER-FREE SUMMARY AND NOTES:

Set in the 90’s, we follow military veteran and white supremacist Nick on his journey to get some super friendly debt collectors off his back. To get money, Nick buys storage units and sells whatever he can find inside that’s worth something (at least to him). Everything changes the day he buys lot 36 and attempts to get a price check for a unique occult table and set of books he finds inside.

Potential scare warnings include Nick being a racist asshole, an unsettling shot of an animal skull early on, and a demon tentacle monster doing demon tentacle monster things.

SPOILER-FILLED ENDING DESCRIPTION AND NOTES:

Early on in the episode, we’re introduced to a very sweet house cleaner named Emilia. Due to a miscommunication, the manager of the storage building accidentally sold her unit to–you guessed it–Nick. Emilia pleads with Nick to get her stuff back, especially sentimental stuff that would have no value to him, but Nick refuses, throwing in a bunch of racist insults and slurs for good measure. Out of the “goodness” in his heart, he does give her the padlock to her old unit. Gee. Thanks.

(This will literally come back to bite him later)

After trying to get a price check for a wooden table he finds in lot 36, Nick is introduced to Roland, who offers a mighty sum for the table and the books found within. If Nick is able to find the elusive fourth volume, the money Roland will pay will absolutely cover Nick’s debts and then some. Nick and Roland head back to the storage lot, determined to chase down the fourth volume. Along the way, we learn with them that the owner of lot 36 made weapons for the Nazis during WWII–a kindred spirit, Nick!

We also learn why the fourth volume is so rare–the books are used to summon a demon, and the fourth volume actually burns to a crisp upon completion of the transaction and pact with said demon. Nick, of course, doesn’t believe any of this and just wants to find the fourth book so he can get paid.

Back in the unit, Roland uncovers a series of newspapers asking what happened to a socialite named Dotty, who apparently disappeared without a trace back in the 40’s. After Nick and Roland discover a false wall in the unit, they enter a cave that smells just super awesome. Following the cave, they enter a room where a mostly mummified body is laid out on a pentagram, intact except for the face, which is nothing but a large opening with some peeks of tentacles every now and then. In the back corner of the room, the elusive fourth volume sits on a stand, decidedly not burned to a crisp. Roland determines that this is in fact the missing Dotty they have just discovered–left to rot left to rot over the years and trap the demon inside her.

Nick, still money-obsessed, breaks the pentagram on the floor in his rush to the back of the room to grab the book. This, of course, was a bad idea, and the demon rises, chomping up Roland. The book burns in Nick’s hands, signalling that the contract has been completed with Roland’s death, but now Nick has a new problem–the demon is loose and doesn’t seem to be all that keen on letting Nick out alive. Nick runs, racing through the storage lot, desperate to find a way out. When he does finally find a door, it’s been locked from the outside.

Who should show up then but Emilia! Nick begs her to open the door and let him out, but instead, she holds up the padlock he had given her earlier. While Nick pleads, she simply places the padlock over the door and walks away, leaving Nick to a tentacly demise. Tentacle-y? Tentacley?

It’s an ending very reminiscent of the “My House” mug shot in Knives Out, which I like. It’s a quick and satisfying little comeuppance story, and while I appreciate the use of mercy in stories and I think there’s a world in which a story like this could be told where the Emilia character does help Nick, it was made very clear throughout that Nick would likely never change. Emilia could help him and he’d still yell at her for “not speaking his language in his country” or whatever. Horror is hard to stomach when a character we love dies–but it can also be a liiiiiittle bit therapeutic when a character like Nick gets what’s coming to them. There’s even a really nice scene where Nick argues with Eddie, the owner of the storage lot, about Nick’s time in the military. Nick complains about how he served his time and his country and so on and so forth and Eddie asks if he happened to notice how many black and brown bodies he stepped on in order to get back home. The story doesn’t make light of Nick’s service, but it does make clear that he’s still incredibly privileged and his status does not excuse his horrific behavior. Tentacle demons don’t discriminate when it comes to their meals, after all.

All in all, I really liked this one. I was left with a couple questions at the end as far as like, the identity of the original owner of lot 36 and why Roland seemed so knowledgeable, but I would also be willing to believe that I missed some things while watching it. It’s also entirely possible that details like that aren’t crucial to the overall story. Still, I’m detail-oriented.

The soundtrack by Tim Davies is incredible and as is true with any del Toro production, the monster effects were simply *chef’s kiss*.

Episode 2: “Graveyard Rats” directed by Vincenzo Natali

she seems nice ❤

SPOILER-FREE SUMMARY AND NOTES:

For this story, we follow a graveyard caretaker named Masson. Though we initially meet him through a scene where he scares off and subsequently shames a couple of graverobbers, moments later we find out that Masson is a bit of a graverobber himself, though his specialty is ripping out gold fillings from the corpses and making money off of them. He drops this initial tooth, however, and when he goes to retrieve it, he’s bitten by a rat. He later tells the individual he usually sells to that he’s more behind than normal because of all the rats doing a bit of their own graverobbing. Desperate after being told he has to settle his debts soon or else, Masson visits a friend of his in the morgue (who is also in on the scheme). Masson learns of a recently deceased rich man whose mouth is FULL of gold fillings, but the morgue employee, Dooley, warns him to wait until after the funeral so the coroner doesn’t start asking questions. So Masson waits, choosing to go after the fillings after the funeral, but it’s a costly choice–there’s more to these graveyard rats than meets the eye.

Potential scare warnings include a whole lotta dead people, a whole lotta rats, skeleton monsters, rat monsters, and a LOT of claustrophobia. If any episodes of The Magnus Archives involving the Buried were ones you skipped, this episode will probably not be your cup of tea.

SPOILER-FILLED ENDING DESCRIPTION AND NOTES:

When our buddy Masson opens the coffin to retrieve his gold filling payday, he’s shocked to see that the coffin is…empty? Yep–turns out the rats are actually stealing the entire damn body. Horrified both by this revelation and by what awaits him if he’s unable to pay off his debts, Masson somewhat overcomes his own claustrophobia and dives into the hole after the body and the rats. After fighting off a huge number of rats and surviving a rockfall, Masson awakens in some sort of underground tunnel system. The peace only lasts so long, as Masson catches sight of a massive hairless rat further down the tunnel, curled around other rats as if she’s feeding them. This queen rat seemingly disappears moments later, however…only to reappear and chase Masson further through the tunnels.

After narrowly escaping her, Masson ends up in a massive cavern filled with a wholeeeee lotta human bones. Initially panicked, Masson tries to escape, before a thought occurs to him…this is a whole lotta bodies with potentially a whole lotta gold fillings ripe for the taking. Now celebrating his luck, Masson moves deeper into the cavern, uncovering a number of riches as well as a fair amount of strange carvings on the wall with some sort of eerie creature depicted in them. Then, Masson stumbles upon a slightly more well-preserved corpse sporting a really nifty (and probably pricey) golden necklace. Thrilled, he rushes up to the corpse and, after some struggling, manages to snatch the necklace.

This, of course, kind of upsets the corpse (I mean, how would you feel if some random dude walked up to you and snatched your necklace?), who comes to life and starts chasing Masson through the caves and tunnels, screeching “MIIIIINE!” all the way. Masson runs, and just when he thinks he’s escaped the corpse, he finds the rat queen again. He manages to defeat her, but the angry corpse is still after him, so there’s no time to sit around and enjoy his victory. Masson is utterly lost however and starts choosing tunnels at random, hoping somehow he can find his way back to the surface.

Just when all seems lost, he spots light at the end of one of the tunnels. Grateful, Masson crawls towards it, relieved, only to discover it’s not outside light at all–it is in fact the reflection of his lantern light on the plaque on the inside of a coffin lid. Unfortunately, he doesn’t even get a chance to wallow in his misery, as he is promptly swarmed with rats and completely stuck with nowhere to go.

We see Masson again when the two graverobbers from the very beginning, having learned nothing, open the casket and recognize the caretaker. Before they can do anything, a rat emerges from Masson’s mouth, and as the graverobbers scatter, Masson is once again swarmed with rats. Rest in peace, my guy.

I liked this one a lot! Sure, I was left with questions about the underground area, but it was presented in such a way that while we never learned specifics, there were enough tropes to rely on that we figured it out. The rats, and the queen rat in particular, were clearly connected to the carving Masson found underground as well as the corpse with the necklace. Taking the ancient necklace was, obviously, a bad idea. We may not know exactly how the underground area came to be the way it was when Masson found it, but we don’t have to understand that to enjoy the episode. I think it would be a fascinating idea for a full-length film, but it works nicely as is.

The score by Jeff Danna is fantastic for setting up the general unease and creepy crawly atmosphere. Also, naming one of the tracks “The Ascent to Hell” (when we’re all so used to referring to something as a descent to hell) is just incredible.

What did we learn from this one, kids? “Don’t do graverobbing if the rats in your area already staked their claim. Also, don’t steal ancient gold necklaces from corpses. That’s just rude.”

Episode 3: “The Autopsy” directed by David Prior

I’m sure those white tentacles in the poster are a totally normal bodily function. For sure. Don’t worry about it.

SPOILER-FREE SUMMARY AND NOTES:

For this story, we follow a Dr. Winters, brought in by a friend to perform several autopsies in the aftermath of a strange and terrible incident. Winters’s friend Sheriff Craven explains the circumstances behind the incident when the two meet up–it’s a strange case of seemingly unconnected events that all led to one particular miner, a man named Joe Allen, using a strange device to set off an explosion, killing himself and several other miners in the process. What starts off as a routine albeit unusual autopsy turns into something far more sinister and surprising by the end of the night.

Potential scare warnings include, once again, a whole lotta dead people, as well as lots of organs and such (it is called The Autopsy for a reason, after all). There’s also the aforementioned explosion, some stabbing and slicing, and some tentacles (though not nearly as many as Lot 36, so there’s that).

SPOILER-FILLED ENDING DESCRIPTION AND NOTES:

While the main meat of the episode (ew, wrong choice of words for this subject matter, my bad) is the titular autopsy, there is a fair amount of time taken to focus on the events leading up to the explosion, that then leads up to the autopsy itself. While Craven goes into detail about the miner who caused the explosion, Allen, discussing how he apparently hadn’t seemed like himself lately, as well as about some dissected human remains the department had recently found in large black bags, Winters takes a moment to divulge that he has been diagnosed with terminal cancer, having a few months to live at the most (this seems like an odd, sad detail in the moment but it does come into play later).

Perhaps the oddest thing about the whole incident, Craven explains, is that at one point, the police were actually in possession of the strange object Allen used in the explosion. Once they’d caught up with him, he had a moment where he could have run–instead, he grabbed the device and headed into the mine, blowing everything (and everyone) up. When Craven then asks if Winters would like him to stick around to keep him company during the autopsies, Winters tells him to head on home and get some sleep (this is, as you may imagine, a poor and unfortunate decision on his part). Now alone with the bodies, Winters starts a recorder to explain his findings to Craven as he carries on, and gets to autopsy-ing.

Though there are some odd details about some of the bodies, there doesn’t seem to be anything incredibly noteworthy, at least at the start. Winters makes note of some strange details as he carries on, but nothing can fully prepare him for the truth, which is….

ALIENS.

(oh, snap)

Yes, that’s right, the reason Allen had been acting so strange lately is because he was actually possessed by an alien parasite creature thing. With tentacles. The thing reanimates the supposedly dead Allen, knocking Winters out. When he comes to, he is strapped to one of the autopsy tables, which is when Alien Allen gets to monologuing about how in its true form, it’s weak in that it is essentially “senseless”–without any sensory organs of its own, it relishes finding hosts to inhabit and using their bodies to experience things, all while feeding off it from the inside. Alien Allen is suuuuuper excited about Winters, specifically because of his cancer. Alien Allen explains that it will essentially fuse minds with Winters, taking the cancer away because it will be feeding off of it, and doesn’t Winters want the cancer to be gone?

While Alien Allen begins splicing up Allen’s body to free the parasite self so it can then slide on into Winters, Winters desperately tries to think of a way to stop the creature, disgusted by the way it enjoys the pain of those it inhabits. As the real Allen dies with the parasite exiting him, he manages to offer the scalpel to Winters, at which point Winters understands everything: Allen caused the explosion because he knew about the parasite, and was trying to get rid of it. And now, with the gift of the scalpel, Winters can do what Allen couldn’t.

While the parasite slowly works its way over to Winters, the doctor gets to work. Stabbing his eardrums with the scalpel, and apparently gouging out his own eyes (I don’t remember that part specifically though it apparently happened, guess I blocked it out…I mean, can you blame me) Winters writes something on his chest in blood before finally slitting his own throat. We then cut to a sort of mystical-looking background, where Winters explains to the parasite through their now shared consciousness that it is now trapped in Winters’s dying and now disabled body–the parasite can’t use many of Winters’s sensory organs for its enjoyment because of how he mutilated them himself. Not only that, but Craven should be showing up soon, and Winters had left his recording on.

Craven does show up, crushed at the state his friend is in, but sees what Winters wrote on his chest with his last moments: instructions to play the recording and burn his body (and the parasite).

This one was devastating to be put through, but I did love it. Part of that is the impeccable acting put out by our leads (F. Murray Abraham, Glynn Turman, and Luke Roberts) but part of it is just how incredibly written and directed this piece is–everything is tied up neatly at the end, and the horror doesn’t win, ya know? Winters’s fate is horrendous, but he’s such a clever and likable character in just the hour or so that we know him, it would be doing him a huge disservice if he had ultimately been unable to take the parasite down with him.

Imagery that will absolutely stay with me forever is the way they cut between Winters performing the autopsies and Allen’s dead hand hanging off the table in the back room multiple times before revealing Allen had been reanimated. We’re used to that shot, where the hand hanging off the edge of the table suddenly twitches or moves, but they don’t play that card immediately and I love them for it. The suspense built up plays directly off of our expectations, and it works so, so well.

The score by Christopher Young is impeccable, and it adds so much in the terms of uncomfy vibes to the story as we learn what really went down.

(To be really nerdy for a second: the first piece featured in the episode, fittingly called “The Autopsy,” is almost…pleasant. It’s played before we know what’s actually happening, but while it isn’t outright scary like the other two pieces Young composed for the episode, something about it still seems…off. It reminds me a lot of the music he composed for the remake of Pet Sematary (my review of which can be found here!) because you would have songs like “Fielding Fine” which are genuinely lovely and nice, and then you’d have…the rest of them. I just think it’s a fascinating thing Young does in the things he composes for.

Anyway. Extra nerdy moment done for now.

But extra sidenote–revisiting my Pet Sematary review now is kinda funny because I make it VERY CLEAR I am no horror aficionado there…and now here I am, a few years later, purposefully watching and reviewing horror stuff because I enjoy it. I still wouldn’t classify myself as an aficionado for this kind of thing, but I do have a newfound appreciation for horror and what it is and can be.

Still don’t like the direction they took Pet Sematary in, though.)

Episode 4: “The Outside” directed by Ana Lily Amirpour

after seeing this one, the light blood splatters on the cutesy-looking title font for this poster make me big sad 😦

SPOILER-FREE SUMMARY AND NOTES:

Welcome to our next story, where we follow a bank teller named Stacey. Stacey is a bit quirky. Though Stacey seems to have a perfectly delightful little life–nice job, nice husband, nice house, etc., she’s convinced that she’s stuck on the “outside,” particularly when it comes to the other women at work. They all look and act a certain way, and Stacey just doesn’t fit in with all that. Also she does taxidermy. So I mean. There’s that.

Everything changes, however, when Stacey gets invited to a Secret Santa party with her coworkers. She and the other women all receive a special kind of lotion called “Alo Glo” which is apparently all the rage and will fix everything wrong in your life, as lotion does. But because you just gotta kick a girl when she’s down, Stacey seems to be allergic to the magical Alo Glo and returns home with a nasty rash. If you thought all seemed to be lost for Stacey, however, fear not–everything’s about to change. So actually, maybe you should fear…

Potential scare warnings include taxidermy and the process of making it, lots of skin stuff because of Stacey’s rash, stabbing, blood, and if you’re more sound-sensitive, lots and lots of squelchy noises because of the lotion.

SPOILER-FILLED ENDING DESCRIPTION AND NOTES:

So the fun really begins when Stacey is watching TV one night after the Secret Santa party (it was actually a fake Secret Santa party, because it was really just one of Stacey’s coworkers giving everyone Alo Glo samples a la one of those mlm product parties. Stacey was the only one who brought a separate gift apparently, and her coworker didn’t really appreciate the taxidermy duck Stacey made. Weird.). She’s miserable, having called out of work due to the rash.

At this point, the man in the Alo Glo ad starts talking to her directly. He is able to convince Stacey that she’s not allergic to the lotion, and it does have the power to make her beautiful and change her life, this ugly and unhealthy rash is just part of the process, that’s all! It just means it’s working! Doesn’t she want to be beautiful? Doesn’t she want to fit in with her coworkers?

This completely convinces Stacey, and she orders a giant box full of Alo Glo. For the next several days, Stacey continues to stay home from work and slather herself in Alo Glo and her rash gets worse and worse and worse. Her husband begs her to stop using the stuff, saying she should see a doctor, but Stacey is delirious with the promise of “beauty” and is utterly convinced the lotion is working, it’s just a long process. Her husband isn’t convinced. He tries to tell her that she’s perfect and wonderful the way she is, and doesn’t she hate those women at work anyways? Why would she want to be like them? He loves her just the way she is, but Stacey doesn’t care.

At this point, all of the bottles of Alo Glo in the box she ordered suddenly open and the lotion starts pouring out of the bottles, filling the box and spilling over the edge. By the time Stacey gets to the box, the spilled lotion has formed into a humanoid figure, reaching out to her. Stacey embraces the lotion person, drenching herself in the stuff in the process. When she re-emerges, her husband is horrified to see her in this state and makes the decision to call a doctor for her. Frustrated that her husband refuses to “support her” and in a moment of pure anger, Stacey ends up stabbing her husband in the forehead. There’s a long and awful moment where her husband is bleeding, desperately trying to reach out on his police radio for help, but it’s too late–Stacey finishes the job with a hatchet.

The lotion person returns, heading up to the bathroom where it then dissolves into the bathtub, filling it. Stacey sinks into the tub, coating herself with Alo Glo (not unlike how the lotion person looked originally). When she emerges, squelching her way into the bedroom, she notices that sections of the lotion are peeling off–everywhere she pulls the lotion off, her skin is revealed to be smooth and perfect, with the rash nowhere to be seen. By the end, she is, at least in her eyes, beautiful. Thrilled, she runs downstairs to show off her new self to her husband…’s corpse.

In a terrific mood, Stacey goes on to taxidermy her husband, throw on some fancy clothes and makeup, and for the first time since the day of the Secret Santa party, head off to work. While her coworkers are shocked to see her initially, they quickly warm up to her, bringing her into their little gossip gaggle. As Stacey laughs along with them, the camera zeroes in on her, until she’s looking and laughing right at us. She’s no longer on the outside–we are.

Look, all of these episodes are unsettling in some way, but this is the one that sticks with me the most. I think it’s phenomenal and also I hate it so much. It’s so uncomfy!! I haven’t been able to stop thinking about it!! But I love the way it turns beauty norms and even the beauty industry itself into a really effective horror story. I hate it. But I also love it. I could go on and on about how incredible the presentation of the superficial coworkers was, and how while we didn’t want to Stacey to want to be like and fit in with them, we understand how she feels, though! It works so well as a story because it’s so easy to see the Stacey in ourselves–it’s an incredibly human thing to want to belong, and to feel like you’re on the outside of something special that other people have.

I think the part that really kills me (no pun intended) is how genuinely good Stacey’s husband was. You get the impression they had a really good marriage and good relationship, and he was truly worried about her–he didn’t even really try to intervene himself until he thought that Stacey’s health might be in danger. Despite her claims that he wasn’t supporting her, he really did try to! He did try to give her space to figure out what she wanted! In the end though, the predatory beauty culture wins out, and Stacey not only murders him, but what we can assume to be the only truly good relationship she had, all so she could fit in with the popular kids. It’s such an eerie and gorgeous commentary on this particular section of modern society, and it’s chilling.

RIP Stacey’s husband–perfect cinnamon roll too good for this world, too pure.

And, of course, Daniele Luppi’s work on the score is phenomenal. It’s super eerie and uncomfy. I hate it. So it fits in perfectly with the episode.

Remember kids, if late night infomercials start talking directly to you, it’s time to turn off the TV and go straight to bed (do not pass “Go,” do not collect $200). Yes, even if the one speaking in the ad looks and sounds like Dan Stevens.

(Sidenote–this episode is based on a webcomic by Emily Carroll which you can check out here if you’re interested! I might do a whole separate post detailing the similarities and differences between the episode and the webcomic because, as previously stated, it is this episode that sticks with me the most out of the bunch and I may never be satisfied talking about it enough)

Episode 5: “Pickman’s Model” directed by Keith Thomas

obsessed with the way Ben Barnes is now typecast as “on the receiving end of unfortunate circumstances due to cursed portraits and everything that entails”

SPOILER-FREE SUMMARY AND NOTES:

Welcome to the early 1900’s! Our protagonist for this story is an art student named William Thurber. Thurber is your typical pretty boy teacher’s pet, complete with lovely girlfriend and a rowdy group of art student buddies. But who cares? No big deal…he wants mooooooooore!

(He wants to be where the monsters are…he wants to see, wants to see them killing!

…*ahem* anyway)

This becomes evident when Thurber becomes absolutely fascinated with new student Richard Pickman. In a realism class where the students are supposed to be drawing what they see, Thurber gets a glimpse of Pickman’s drawing and sees something absolutely horrendous and spooky, though not necessarily realism. Intrigued, Thurber sort of adopts Pickman, encouraging him and asking him where he gets the ideas for his incredibly monstrous and unsettling work. Pickman himself seems to be a sort of foil for Thurber, appearing shy and awkward in comparison to Thurber’s confidence and charming personality.

This friendship is cut short, however, when Thurber starts seeing creatures from Pickman’s art in the real world. When the effect it has on him almost ruins his chances with his girlfriend, Thurber decides he’s had enough.

Years later, Thurber is still having dreams about Pickman’s paintings, but he has, for the most part, seemingly moved on with his life. That is, until Pickman himself reappears, setting into motion a horrific sequence of events that, despite all his efforts, Thurber is unable to avoid or change.

Potential scare warnings include really unsettling and scary paintings (no…really), lots of monsters, blood, and um…cannibalism? They don’t show the actual act, but rather what leads up to it, so it’s heavily implied.

SPOILER-FILLED ENDING DESCRIPTION AND NOTES:

As you might imagine, Thurber is none too thrilled when Pickman waltzes back into his life years later. He drops off a painting of his as a gift, and Thurber discovers this far too late–his son, James, has seen the painting and now is having awful nightmares. Now this feels personal, and Thurber confronts Pickman, who genuinely doesn’t seem to understand why Thurber is so unhinged about all of this.

(It’s worth noting, also, that nobody else seems to have the same reactions to Pickman’s paintings that Thurber does. Sure, James starts having nightmares, but no one else seems as disgusted and horrified by the art as Thurber is. In fact, when Thurber brings up not allowing Pickman to have a place in a gallery show or not wanting him to even be around anyone else, everyone honestly just chastises Thurber for being rude to poor Pickman. C’mon, Thurber, that’s not very nice of you.)

Pickman finally convinces Thurber to come to his home, to his studio, to see the art. All Pickman wants, he claims, is for the work to be seen. Thurber, itching for this nightmare to end, agrees. Pickman’s studio is just as eerie and unsettling as you would expect, and of course, driven mad by everything so far and his own frustration, Thurber makes a horrible decision and ends up shooting Pickman, killing him. Maybe on accident? Regardless, it’s not great. Thurber then sets fire to all of Pickman’s art, determined to see the nightmare end once and for all, but he’s shocked to see one of the monsters from Pickman’s work appear, dragging Pickman’s body off and presumably eating him. Thurber can’t spend too much time thinking on that, however, and seems to convince himself that everything, including the real monsters, will burn with the art, closing the book on that story for good.

Thurber takes his wife and son to see the gallery show he put on, sending them off to explore while he meets with one of his friends. Sadly, the good feeling doesn’t last long, as Thurber realizes that many of the works on the walls are in fact Pickman’s. Not only that, they’re pieces that Thurber remembers burning that one night. When he goes to ask his friend what the hell is going on, he’s horrified to see his friend has been staring at one of the pieces in a trance, the left side of his head completely mangled while he mutters about something.

Realizing what this could mean, Thurber rushes off to find his family, but it’s too late–they’ve seen the paintings. Thurber rushes them home, ordering one of the gallery workers to take down all of Pickman’s works and destroy them. With that done, Thurber himself heads home. His wife is facing away from him, steadily chopping something. Thurber tiredly apologizes to her, explaining that it’s all over now, and everything’s fine.

As you can probably guess, everything is not fine.

When his wife turns around, we and Thurber are met with the horrific sight and knowledge that she has gouged her own eyes out. Pickman’s paintings have driven her mad, and she is speaking strangely (I mean…you probably would be, too).

(Also, we never see what it is exactly she was chopping up, but the sound effects imply…yeah.)

Remembering one of Pickman’s works in particular, and extremely unsettled, Thurber asks where their son is. His wife simply smiles, and Thurber opens the oven to find…yeah. Just like one of Pickman’s paintings, his wife gouged out her own eyes, and then proceeded to murder and roast their son. Aaaaaand then the episode ends so we have no idea how Thurber deals with this particular roadblock…

Though not one of my favorites, I did enjoy this one, particularly the tragedy of it all. There’s something about the way that Thurber only realizes Pickman’s paintings do depict reality and even the future when it’s just slightly too late–he ends up losing whatever friendship he might have had with Pickman as well as his wife and son. Even Pickman thought they were friends, and tells him as much, and it just breaks my little heart–the story does a fascinating flip from hinting that Pickman, with his strange mannerisms and eerie paintings, must be the villain, to showing that it was never him but the monsters themselves and even Thurber. All Pickman wanted was someone who understood and saw beauty in his work, and Thurber shuts all of that down so he can have a normal life. That choice, however, then leads to him losing absolutely everything.

(This isn’t even touching on the potential queer undertones here–Pickman being “the odd one out,” no one understands him, Thurber reaches out and forms a friendship because he’s drawn to him (HE GIVES HIM A NICKNAME EVEN), but ultimately he chooses societal norms over it all and ends up marrying his girlfriend and having a family with her, shunning Pickman even when he comes back into his life, even when Pickman assumes they’re still friends…IT’S JUST. YES.)

At the end of it, all Pickman wanted was someone who understood and could see the world the way he did. He just wanted someone to share that with. When he brings Thurber to his studio, I don’t think it’s with malicious intent, I truly think he assumes that once Thurber sees the truth, he’ll understand. They’ll be in this together.

But Thurber doesn’t give him the chance. Pickman dies. The monsters are real. His wife goes mad. Children get tossed into ovens. You get the idea.

The score by Michael Yezerski is–you guessed it–amazing. It’s a beautiful blend of sweeping and lovely to set the scene when things are “good” and incredibly eerie and haunting for when the more horrific things happen.

All in all, it’s a great entry into the “Ben Barnes has his life ruined by cursed paintings” cinematic universe.

Episode 6: “Dreams in the Witch House” directed by Catherine Hardwicke

she seems nice ❤ (the sequel)

SPOILER-FREE SUMMARY AND NOTES:

Welcome back to the early 1900’s!

(Yes, we’re still here–this was the Lovecraft section of the cabinet)

For this tale, we follow a man named Walter Gilman on his supernatural quest to save his sister’s soul. When he was a kid, Walter’s twin sister Epperley died, and he witnessed her spirit get dragged away into a forest. Years later, he’s now working for a sort of paranormal investigation society, searching high and low for some way to bring his sister back ~from the beyond~. So far, nothing has worked.

As the people in his life begin to lose patience with him and his obsession with doing the impossible, Walter finally stumbles upon something that almost gives him exactly what he wants. The downside? Epperley’s spirit isn’t the only one out there hoping to get back.

Potential scare warnings include some light creature jumpscares, I think some stabbing, something very similar to that famous scene from the movie Alien, some dead bodies, and some very unsettling critters.

SPOILER-FILLED ENDING DESCRIPTION AND NOTES:

So basically, as is to be expected, Walter must first deal with a sort of “fall from grace” kind of deal before he’s able to reunite with his sister in any form. His best friend and coworker at the supernatural society basically quits so he can get a better paying job, Walter himself is let go from the society and disgraced, and he loses his original place of residence. He has a plan though!

Walter rents a room in this deeeefinitely not haunted house which apparently used to belong to a witch who was executed, named Keziah Mason. He also starts frequenting this uh…bar? Smoking room? Local cool kid hangout? where he takes an Indigenous drug that allows him to actually venture into the Forest of Lost Souls, which is where Epperley was dragged off to when they were kids. He’s able to find her, but he can’t ever stay in the Forest for long–plus, something has detected his presence there.

(It’s Keziah, it’s the witch lady…I mean it’s called Dreams in the Witch House we were bound to reach this point some time)

After one of his visits, however, he finds that he was actually able to take a torn piece of Epperley’s sleeve back with him to the real world, which convinces him that it is possible to bring his whole sister back with him. By this point he has also befriended another tenant of the witch house, a fellow disgraced individual who believes that Keziah is still out there somewhere, doing her best to return to the real world.

Despite everyone’s warnings, Walter stays focused, learning that the reason he was able to bring Epperley’s sleeve back and the reason he’s able to cross the threshold and find her so easily is because he and Epperley have their own kind of magic: they’re twins. Twins are the key! Determined and confident, Walter ventures into the Forest once more. Unfortunately, he and Epperley are somewhat stuck now because Keziah knows what they’re up to and wants to use them to return herself. Just when they think they’ve outmaneuvered her, however, their position is given away by–and I wish I was joking–a talking human-faced rat.

Walter and Epperley do escape, but they have been followed. They seek refuge in a church, which Keziah at least temporarily cannot enter, and they call on Walter’s old buddy from the supernatural society (who, for his credit, believes Walter now. That’s nice). Shenanigans ensue, and they end up back at the witch house. The new ultimatum, they learn, is that Walter has to die before dawn in order for either Keziah or human-rat to come back permanently. Just when all seems lost and Keziah has Walter pinned, Epperley comes through and destroys her. This action, however, has a price–having saved her brother and escaped from the Forest, Epperley’s spirit is free and she’s able to move on. Walter is, seemingly, alone again.

Meanwhile, the other witch house tenant and Walter’s buddy uncover a dark secret in the house: the body of both Keziah and the human-rat, who turns out to be her familiar, Jenkins.

(Fun fact! The body they use for Jenkins literally looks like a rat skeleton with a human skull on top, most likely a reference to the ways freak shows and cabinets of curiosities would actually meld skeletons in order to sell the “truth” of the existence of hybrid creatures, like mermaids. Very fun! I mean, horrific and unsettling in context, but fun!)

Speaking of rat-boy, guess who hitched a ride out of the Forest? Jenkins is here and he’s pissed at Walter for messing up their plans. He actually BURSTS out of Walter’s chest, a la Alien, and kills him, right before dawn, thereby possessing him. Now in control of a full human body, Jenkins/Walter heads out into the streets, excited to try out this body and all it can do.

(So, yes, out of context spoilers for this episode include, weirdly enough…Ratatouille.)

I walked away from this episode with a lot of mixed feelings and thoughts, but primarily…what?

The more I thought about it, though, the more I was able to settle on thinking how much I really enjoyed this one. It’s absolutely weird, don’t get me wrong, but I think that’s kind of its charm. I think it was smart to pair this story with Pickman’s Model (in terms of when the episode was released) because Pickman’s is so, so dark and bleak and just…yeah. It’s good, it’s just rough. This one isn’t necessarily any happier, of course, but the absolute strange and quirky nature of it was just…I like it. I have yet to hear of anyone else feeling this way, but that’s fine–maybe this one was made for me and me only.

The whole thing also literally comes full circle, because they actually start the episode with a shot of Walter’s body and you hear Jenkin’s voice talking as if it’s him–and by the end, it is! He even sets it up the way Flynn does in Tangled (“this…is the story of how I died…”) and you aaaaalmost forget about that by the time you actually hear both Walter and Jenkins speak. It’s built up in such a way, even, that you think maybe the protagonists won! Alas…it’s another victory for the cursed rats.

(What is it with this anthology and cursed rats?)

I don’t know–something about it feels a lot more fantastical than some of the other entries, and I think that’s cool? But I can see where, coming out of Pickman’s Model, this one feels a bit too out there. Horror can be quirky and weird, too, you guys–that’s one of the beautiful things about the genre as a whole.

As always, the soundtrack for this one, composed by Anne Chmelewsky, fits the vibe perfectly and I love it.

Episode 7: “The Viewing” directed by Panos Cosmatos

somehow, the worst part of this poster for me is the strings of slime stretched between the two horns, and not the horns themselves

SPOILER-FREE SUMMARY AND NOTES:

WELCOME TO THE 1970’S!! In this story, we follow a rather unusual group of individuals who are summoned to an eclectic rich guy’s mansion for “a special viewing.” On the way over, they do their best to try and figure out what a musician, a physicist, an author, and a psychic all have in common (yes, it does sound like the setup for a bad joke). Upon their arrival, they meet both the rich guy himself and his physician and, after a whole lot of drugs to “expand their consciousness” and “get them on the same wavelength,” the viewing commences.

As you might expect, things go horribly, horribly wrong

Potential scare warnings include just a whole lot of drug use, people making a lot of really dumb decisions, and lots of face/body melting. Like, lots.

SPOILER-FILLED ENDING DESCRIPTION AND NOTES:

Honestly like, 80% of this one is the quirky cast of characters doing drugs and talking about life, so we can skim through that beginning section. Basically, our cast includes:

  1. Eccentric old rich guy Lionel Lassiter who has very strange decorating taste, among other things
  2. His physician Dr. Zahra who I’m sure is extremely smart and capable but also her primary treatment plan seems to be cocaine, which I mean…ya know
  3. Local musician who’s lost his mojo until he starts smoking, Randall Roth
  4. Local physicist who believes in ~aliens~, Charlotte Xie
  5. Local author who’s also, let’s face it, kind of a jerk, Guy Landon
  6. Local ~quirky~ psychic, Targ Reinhhard
  7. (There’s also Lionel’s assistant? Employee? Driver who brings the others to the rich guy house? He’s also there, at least sort of)

And Lionel and Zahra spend most of the time just convincing the others to drink and do drugs (you could totally do a “this is your brain on drugs” ad with the footage of melted faces once we get to that point) and literally the only reason I’m unsure why this is so necessary comes later when it like…directly leads to a lot of death.

Anyway, once everyone’s good and high, (and once Charlotte and Zahra have had lots of ~gay pining~ moments), we finally get to the actual viewing section of the story. Lionel takes everyone to a ~secret room~ where he reveals what he’s been holding on to: some sort of large, sparkly meteor thing (it’s unclear if the meteor is actually sparkly, or if that’s just how they all interpret it due to collective drug brain). They’re all intrigued, of course, and Charlotte is the most excited, being an alien physicist and all. Randall, meanwhile, continues smoking in the room, despite Lionel repeatedly asking him to stop. It is, however, too late.

The meteor seems to inhale the smoke, glittering ominously one last time before it cracks open like an egg (once again…this is your brain on drugs) and reveals that inside is some sort of orange, globby friend. The whole thing was like alien silly putty! By this point, everyone has fallen into some sort of trance, however, and this is where things get unfortunate:

Targ and Guy are the first to die, a la face melting and head exploding, respectively. Panicking, Charlotte and Randall are watching in horror and trying to find a way out of the sealed room. Still in the trance, Zahra approaches the blob and touches it–this causes her to melt. The alien ooze then makes its way over to Lionel, possessing him and kind of turning him into this orange blobby humanoid figure with horns. By this point, Lionel’s assistant/employee friend arrives, promising to give Charlotte and Randall time to escape. Assistant/employee does his best, but ultimately, he is no match for alien ooze.

Charlotte and Randall, meanwhile, hightail it out of there and make their escape in a snazzy sports car, trying to figure out if what they just witnessed actually happened. At the same time, alien ooze makes its way through the sewers, emerging just outside the city–it stalks towards the buildings, and the camera zooms out slowly, showing flickering streetlamps and probably hundreds if not thousands of unsuspecting people who have no idea how to deal with alien ooze.

While I still like this one (because I do like all of them), I will say this one is probably my least favorite of the bunch if only because it’s not my style. The questions I had at the end of this one bugged me more than some of the others–why did the meteorite react to the smoke from Randall? Why was Lionel’s assistant/driver guy completely crying in that one cut when Lionel asked him about the gold gun? Why did the trance state affect some of the attendees so strongly while it didn’t affect Charlotte and Randall strongly enough, thereby allowing them to escape? Not end of the world questions, of course, but for me personally, it left me a bit disappointed and I feel like it weakened the piece as a whole. But that’s just me, I’m sure it was a favorite episode for others and that’s awesome. I’m fully willing to believe the point of it went right over my head. Maybe it’s a commentary on how rich people’s questionable hobbies can ultimately lead to their downfall? Or maybe it’s just another entry in the timeless story of “don’t mess with aliens and turn things we don’t understand into needless spectacle”

Nope review coming to a blog near you *finger guns emoji*)

One thing I did like while trying to look up what year this one takes place–in the prologue for this episode, del Toro talks about what happens when the viewers become the viewed, which is a horrifying question and initially, made me wonder what kind of episode we were in for. This meant at the time, I didn’t see how that question related to the episode at hand. When I looked up the year for this one, however, I forgot to specify “the viewing” from this anthology and just left it as-is, which meant all the results were about the stage of a funeral referred to as “the viewing.”

This hit me like you wouldn’t believe. I’m not sure if it’s the intended connection we’re meant to make, but seeing as a key piece of this episode is us, the viewers, watching this group of people melt to their deaths…well. The ensemble of the episode thought they were attending a viewing of sorts, and they were, but the episode ropes us in as well because we are viewing them.

Then, of course, you get to wonder–who’s viewing us?

“The Viewing Suite” is the only piece of music on the soundtrack for this episode, by Daniel Lopatin. It’s definitely an unsettling, electronic vibe that fits the overall aesthetic of the episode super well. Which means that, of course, I like it.

Episode 8: “The Murmuring” directed by Jennifer Kent

birds playing Halloween charades over here

SPOILER-FREE SUMMARY AND NOTES:

Welcome to the 50’s!

For this story we follow two ornithologists (bird people), Nancy and Edgar. The couple are about to take a trip to a remote island to further study a specific type of bird, a dunlin, and more specifically, why the birds move in what are called murmurations (the episode explains this beautifully, but essentially: you know when a flock of birds all move together, changing directions in a split second? How do they communicate that? How and why do they do it? That kind of thing).

Upon arrival, they are introduced to a caretaker who set up a previously abandoned house for them to stay in, rather than the tents they had planned. As the couple begin their research, it becomes increasingly clear that something else is in that house with them, and two women across history are able to share their grief amidst the call of the flocks of dunlins that inhabit the island.

Potential scare warnings include a creepy child (this is horror, after all), some light jumpscares, child death, suicide, and some like…frightening imagery I guess? The ghosts are spooky-looking.

SPOILER-FILLED ENDING DESCRIPTION AND NOTES:

The house Nancy and Edgar are told to stay in had previously been abandoned for decades, and it does show in the weathering on the exterior, but the caretaker we meet did go through and make sure it has all the basic amenities. There is a hint very early on that something tragic has happened in Nancy and Edgar’s lives, thus Edgar thinks the time away will be good for them.

While the research seems to be happening smoothly enough to begin with, Nancy starts hearing a child’s voice on the recordings she’s taken of the dunlins. She desperately wants to ignore it in the beginning, but the ghosts won’t let her. It becomes apparent that the house is home to two ghosts (at least, maybe there’s more? spoooooky) a young woman and a little boy. The boy always appears frightened and soaking wet, occasionally mentioning how his mom is angry with him, while the woman is frantic, screaming and rushing around, hair flying everywhere. You know, usual ghost stuff.

As time passes and Nancy encounters the ghosts more and more, she becomes obsessed with putting the pieces together of who they are and what happened to them. This puts a massive strain on her relationship with Edgar, as we learn that he wanted to use the trip as an opportunity to rekindle things with his wife after the loss of their daughter, Ava. Through various arguments, we learn that, at least in Edgar’s eyes, Nancy has not grieved for their daughter at all–she hasn’t even cried. After Nancy sort of forcefully asks the caretaker who the previous owners of the house were and what their story was, Edgar has had enough. Why is she more interested in a couple of strangers than her own family?

Thanks to the caretaker and some letters uncovered in Nancy’s own sleuthing, she learns that the woman’s name is Claudette–and as per true haunted house tradition, her life was filled with tragedy. Claudette was in love with a soldier, and though all seemed to be going well, it turns out he was actually married to someone else entirely and he straight up abandoned Claudette when he learned that she was pregnant with their child. Claudette was basically dropped onto the island to live alone, shunned by her family thanks to a scandal that wasn’t her fault. Like Nancy, Claudette had a fascination with the birds on the island and longed to be free like they are (something that causes Nancy to feel a sort of kinship with her, as that is always Nancy’s answer to the question of “what do you like about birds so much?”) But one night, years later, the stress and hysteria proved to be too much, and Claudette snapped, drowning her son in the bathtub.

Initially upon learning this, Nancy is furious with Claudette–I mean, who does that? So one night, when Edgar has already left to study the dunlins (and kind of made it clear that unless Nancy reached out to state otherwise, their relationship was over), Nancy decides to confront the ghosts. She speaks to the scared boy, explaining what happened to him, that his mother did a terrible thing but it isn’t his fault, and the boy runs to her, disappearing and presumably finally moving on. Now ready to confront Claudette, Nancy turns and realizes…she got the story wrong. Claudette did drown her son in a moment of intense anger, but she was wracked with so much guilt immediately afterwards that she jumped from the attic window, killing herself. Heartbroken, Nancy rushes outside to where Claudette would have fallen, but of course, nothing is there.

Instead, however, a large flock of dunlins head straight for Nancy, surrounding her in the murmuration. She spreads her arms, closes her eyes…and then she cries. Once the birds leave, Nancy calls Edgar on the radio and tells him through her tears that she’s ready to talk about Ava.

If The Outside was one of my favorite episodes from the anthology because it made me think and made me uncomfy, this one is one of my favorite episodes because it made me think and made me treasure humanity. It’s one of my favorite horror types, the Crimson Peak and The Haunting of Hill House/Bly Manor type of “it’s not a ghost story–it’s a story with ghosts in it” and “it’s not a ghost story…it’s a love story.” It’s a beautiful tragedy that focuses on relationship expectations and how we relate to the world around us.

I’ve read a couple different reviews talking about what the point of this episode is, and I love how we’ve all come away with different things. Is it a case study of how women’s grief is treated in society as a whole? Is it a commentary on family and the various things that can mean, particularly when loss comes into play?

I don’t know. I think it’s all of those things, and maybe more. We don’t know how Ava dies, or even how old she is when it happens. There’s a scene where Nancy dreams about a baby, so it’s possible that’s how old Ava was when she died, or it could just be Nancy remembering what her daughter had been like. Interestingly, we learn more about Claudette’s tragedy than Nancy’s. There’s a lot that remains unexplained, and I think that’s the beauty of it. I think there is certainly room to interpret that when Claudette died, when she fell from the window, she became those birds she loved so much (Dear Esther, anyone?). So when Nancy learns the truth and she runs outside and the murmuration encases her, it’s not a moment of horror–it’s a moment of gratitude. I think it’s very possible that being trapped in that house made Claudette forget what she had done to her son, so all she was left with was the anger. When Nancy set her son free, Claudette had to once again face what she did…and remembering that grief is what set her free also. That grief that surrounds Nancy at the end in the form of the birds is what allows her to reach out to her husband, to talk about what happened to them. Nancy has what Claudette never did: someone to share her grief with. Is that the only interpretation of the piece? I don’t think so. Grief is such a powerful human emotion, and we’ve spent centuries trying to maneuver it. This episode is just one more way of doing that.

Combined with a haunting soundtrack by Jed Kurzel, I love this piece. I think everything about it is beautifully done, and it’s definitely one I would watch again.

SHOULD YOU WATCH THIS ANTHOLOGY FOR YOURSELF?

YES.

If horror is of any interest to you at all, if you love Guillermo del Toro, if you love anthologies, if you love short, spooky stories…yes. I think if horror isn’t your thing, I would still think about giving it a try, but trust me–I get wanting to skip it.

All in all, it’s a beautiful collection of weird and wonderful things that showcase what it is to be human in many different ways, which, as stated before, is exactly what a cabinet of curiosities should be. If any of this sounded interesting to you, I highly recommend checking all this out for yourself.

Splicing Up The Details of “Don’t Worry Darling”–everything we know so far

breaking out of my void to say um??? New trailer for this movie starring Florence Pugh?? Directed by Olivia Wilde??? GEMMA CHAN IS IN IT???? MUSIC BY JOHN POWELL??????? goodbye

Unlike my posts theorizing about The Quarry (which is delightful so far and yas there will be a review post for that just as soon as I’m done zooming around Hot Wheels tracks in Forza), this one won’t involve pulling much from various social media sites because there just isn’t that much out there yet.

We do however have 2 official trailers and they are a doozy.

THE STORY SO FAR

At its core, the film seems to be about young couple Alice (Florence Pugh) and Jack (Harry Styles) in the 1950s living out their perfect lives in their perfect town. That is, of course, until Alice starts to question some less-than-ideal elements of their existence and everything immediately starts unraveling.

The official website actually offers a pretty in-depth synopsis for us: Alice and Jack are just one of the many couples living in the “experimental company town” of Victory–during the day, the men go to work on the top-secret Victory Project while the wives hang out and clean and cook and so on and so forth. As Alice starts to question things, she learns more and more about “something sinister lurking beneath the attractive facade” and ultimately must decide how much she’s willing to lose in order to expose the truth.

Much of what we see in the trailers involves Alice specifically questioning what on earth is actually happening with the “Victory Project.” There’s a delightfully unsettling dinner scene where she brings this up and is challenged by Frank (Chris Pine), the CEO of the project.

(Sidenote: so happy for Chris Pine to get to play a villain! Thrilled for him to join another Hollywood Chris on this journey of “I’m super pretty and usually get to play the romantic lead/good guy so therefore audiences trust me and it will add a very unsettling element to this film now that I’m a villain.” Basically, Evil Chris Evans in Knives Out lives rent-free in my mind forever and now he’ll have some company!)

There are a lot of side-elements to this basic story shown to us in the trailers: Alice and Jack’s relationship, Alice’s friendship with the other wives, a ballet class? For some reason??? The trailers are DELIGHTFUL and I really think they’ve done a good job of building up tension and hinting at the overall mystery without giving too much away.

SOME THEORIES

EVERYONE LOOK AT GEMMA CHAN I LOVE HER SO MUCH

Okay anyway

Just like you would find in any good Jordan Peele thriller, something dark is lurking underneath the picture perfect facade, but what is it exactly?

At this stage of our knowledge (or really, lack thereof) about the film, I’m guessing right now it has something to do with atomic bombs and, more specifically, atomic bomb testing.

I mean, an obvious nod to that could easily be how similar the names are of secret projects being worked on: in the film, we have the “Victory Project,” and in reality, we had the “Manhattan Project.”

However, slight disclaimer: advertising for the film always highlights the 1950s as the timeline, whereas the Manhattan Project was exclusively 1940s. Its legacy and the work it inspired carried into the 50s and beyond, but still, it’s worth noting.

But wait–there’s more!

One of the more eerie shots in the trailer is a bird’s eye view of the town of Victory–an almost perfect circular town paradise in the middle of nowhere in the desert. There’s another moment where the wives are all hanging out and chatting when suddenly there’s a loud rumble and they react like it’s some sort of minor earthquake (“the boys and their toys” one of the characters says). In the other trailer, there’s a clip of Alice and Jack at home when the rumbling begins and Jack reaches out to steady a coffee cup. This tells us the rumbling happens at least two different times in the film–it could be a regular occurrence and the characters are so used to it, they just don’t care or question it.

Does everyone remember that one scene from the Indiana Jones movie where Indy hops into a fridge and survives a nuclear blast? But prior to that, he was in this picture perfect town full of mannequins?

WELCOME TO DOOM TOWN

Specifically in the 1950s, this was a real thing the US did to test out the effects of nuclear weapons. My personal research varied with amounts, but there were at least two different fully decked-out towns set up and then essentially, destroyed. Reports vary on whether they were Doom Towns, Survival Towns, both, etc. Houses were filled with furniture, real food, and fake people–one of these houses still stands today in Nevada if you’re looking for a fun road trip stop!

So, hear me out: that’s what Victory is. The Victory Project is, like the Manhattan Project before it, specifically focused on atomic testing while Victory is a Doom Town. Except instead of mannequins, they want to test out how it affects living people.

There’s even a clip shown in both trailers where Alice has a carton of eggs out but when she smashes one–it’s completely empty. It’s a fake egg.

The original Doom Towns had fake people and real food–Victory has fake food and real people.

They could even bring in how much of a disaster communication was on the original Manhattan Project: for example, if Alice and Jack are the picture of romance (as implied in the trailers) why would Jack willingly work on something that could bring about Alice’s death?

That’s just it: he may not even know what he’s working on. So many of the people working on the Manhattan Project had zero clue what they were building.

Speaking of Alice and Jack, their relationship is pushed a lot in the trailers. Almost every other clip is the two of them snuggling, making out, staring longingly at each other, or doing unspeakable things on a dinner table. The second trailer even has one of the other wives say that “Alice and Jack only have time for each other.” Later on, however, there are some clips where Jack is yelling at Alice because “not everyone gets this opportunity” and saying “I gave you all of this, Alice!” One of my favorite eerie moments is at a dinner scene where Alice is asking another woman where she met her husband, and Alice finishes the story for her, word for word. It seems to be implying that perhaps all of the couples met the exact same way. Maybe none of the relationships are real.

That, or perhaps the men do know more than they’re letting on while keeping their wives in the dark, for the sake of having those test subjects in the town.

(Speaking of: the website synopsis says that the town of Victory is for the men working on the project and their families, and even though all of the wives are shown…there are no kids? Anywhere? They might just not be in the trailers, but it’s just…interesting)

THINGS I DON’T HAVE AN ANSWER FOR

WHY IS THERE BALLET. WHY IS THE BALLET CLASS SUCH A BIG PART OF THE TRAILER. I DON’T UNDERSTAND.

I mean, cool major Black Swan vibes and all but–????

There’s also a fun sequence where Alice is running from a large group of people in red jumpsuits–maybe this was just a sequel to Us all along!

The second trailer also showed us some scenes that seem to point to Alice seeing a therapist of some sort. He mentions that other patients of his have nightmares, and there are pills that will help. I guess this could imply that this whole thing is some sort of mind experiment?? I mean, MK-Ultra started in 1953, so………they could go that route. This therapist also says “keep calm and carry on” which is notably a reference to WWII and therefore out of the 1950s timeline, for whatever that’s worth.

I also couldn’t begin to tell you why the second trailer is full of an ominous voice saying “tick…tock…” although I did at first wonder if having the main character be named Alice was some sort of Alice in Wonderland reference, and therefore, the “tick tock” voice could be referring to the whole white-rabbit-being-late thing. It’s unclear, though, of course.

The only truly notable social media post (at this point) is on Instagram–it’s the poster I put at the top of the post, before it glitches out and turns upside down and the text changes to “don’t worry” before flipping back around. That plane in the poster is shown briefly in a trailer, where it flies overhead but sort of wobbles in and out of focus. Couldn’t begin to tell you what that means at this point.

One of the taglines for the film seems to be “are you ready to live the life you deserve?” which could imply that all the characters in Victory are horrible people and they have this coming. Or something. We’ll find out!

And that’s pretty much it for now! I’ll pop back in with updates when we have them, but for now, we’re stuck waiting until the end of September.

So until then, check out the trailers and get ready for a wild ride come release day!

Joker REVIEW

*deep inhale*

Good people of the Internet.

Occasionally with my A-List thing, I have gone to see a movie that I would never have seen otherwise. Sometimes, this has paid off very well for me (Booksmart, Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark, Us, Escape Room) and sometimes, I have been filled with almost nothing but regret (Alita: Battle Angel, Pet Sematary, Avengers: Endgame, Toy Story 4). Nonetheless, I’ve had a fun time breaking down why exactly I’ve enjoyed some movies more than others, or why some had an effect on me while others didn’t.

I, generally, like superhero movies. So like a week ago, I took myself to the movies and I saw Joker, which…is…a movie. That I saw. Yep.

Mhm. It’s definitely a film. And I certainly saw it.

THE PLOT

The film follows Arthur Fleck, who starts as a clown for hire and ends up as just a clown 🌝

Okay, okay, plot. The plot.

Arthur Fleck is a “troubled” individual with an interesting brain thing that means occasionally he will go into fits of uncontrollable laughter. He has laminated cards that explain this that he can hand to people if it happens.

Arthur lives with and takes care of his ailing mother, who idolizes Thomas Wayne (resident Rich Guy Who Makes TV Appearances Often and Talks About The Greater Good) and believes that “if he only knew how we were living, he would help us.” Arthur doesn’t really believe this, but he loves his mother and humors her about this.

The point of the film is to follow Arthur and attempt to explain what sent him into the downward spiral that led to him being known as the infamous Joker. That’s about it.

I can’t really say much more without spoiling things (if you’re someone who cares about that for this movie, I mean…he’s…he becomes the Joker I don’t know how much more obvious it could be) and I really don’t want to hold back my opinions anymore SO without further ado…

THE REVIEW

Like I said above, I, generally, like superhero movies. I was intrigued by the idea of a solo Joker movie because I think Joker is a fascinating villain, and I think there’s a lot you can do with his backstory–while still making it crystal clear that he is a villain.

I really, really disliked this movie. I wanted to like it, I really did, but I just don’t. I can’t.

I took some time getting this review out partially because I bought Breath of the Wild recently and wow that game is fantaaaaaaastic, but also because I wanted this to be as objective as possible. My first draft of this review was scathing and unfair and without any thought to the other side. I’m sure much of it is still like that, despite my best efforts, but fun fact: it’s my movie blog, and if you disagree, you’re welcome to write your own review. Cool thanks.

I can and will give a plethora of reasons for disliking it, believe me. I walked out of that theater feeling cheated and gross and just bleh. I continue to think that it’s such a shame, because it’s a beautifully shot film. The cinnamontography is absolutely incredible, and Joaquin Phoenix does an amazing job as the lead. It’s stunning acting work and stunning camera work and it’s a SHAME that it’s wasted on whatever the hell this movie is.

Like…we have ANOTHER Alita: Battle Angel you guys. With the exception that I don’t think there was any necessarily stellar acting in Alita, but I digress. For the moment.

I guess there’s no better way to put it than I was disappointed. It’s very similar to how I felt walking out of Endgame, except this one makes me fear for what people who “relate” to Arthur Fleck will do. But both films made me feel stupid for ever thinking some profound, good storytelling could come out of superhero stories.

And it really sucks because it is possible: Black Panther, Thor: Ragnarok, Into the Spider-Verse, Wonder Woman, Captain Marvel, the very first Iron Man, these are examples to me of how profound, good storytelling can come out of superhero stories. I, admittedly, don’t follow any of the comics (there are so many oh god how do I even start ahhhhhhh), but from what I hear from people, there is some amazing storytelling at work there.

So, wow, it really feels like a letdown when we get a movie like this.

Now, normally, I would break down such elements as the music, the characters, the ending, so on and so forth, but I don’t think that would get us anywhere with this one, and it’s not really what I want to talk about anyway, so things will be divided up a little differently this time.

Without any further ado, let’s dive into…whatever the hell Joker is.

Also, spoiler alert now in effect. Although anything I say that might sound surprising and plot-twist-y might get proved false later and leave you sitting there like “…wait, what?” And that’s pretty much how the whole movie goes, so you’re welcome.

THE MENTAL ILLNESS THING

So let’s start with probably the most obvious thing: the Joker is like, not…well?

I mean, kind of a “no shit, Sherlock” moment but hear me out: this is a very, very big deal in the movie. Arthur Fleck, a.k.a., Joker, is mentally ill somehow. I don’t think we ever learn how specifically, it’s just a general “Mental Illness” thing. Whatever it is, he hallucinates, isn’t super great in social situations, feels zero remorse about killing multiple people, and paints his own blood on his face at the end. So. Yeah.

He’s also aware that he has a mental illness. I mean he sees some sort of health worker/therapist whatever before the funding gets cut, he knows the laughing thing isn’t normal, and he writes in his notebook the very, very profound “the worst part about having a mental illness is that people expect you to act like you don’t” (or something very similar to that) Oh. Wow. So profound. Much deep. *confetti or whatever*

Here’s why this is an incredibly generic route for the movie to take and also why it doesn’t work: it’s been done before. It’s the kind of general “mental illness is eeeeeevil” plot that you could have expected out of a movie in 2010, maybe, but this is 2019, ya fools (and now it’s 2020 even!!). Writing off the main villain’s issues as “general mental illness” is just bland, not to mention incredibly insensitive. Portraying a bad guy as mentally ill? Wow, way to vilify an entire large chunk of the human population yet again. It’s the same thing you do when you code your villain as gay–it’s been done countless times before, and all it does is further solidify the narrative that that group of people is subhuman and in contrast to “heroes.” Good work, y’all.

(“But wait!” I hear you say, “Batman doesn’t even make an APPEARANCE in this film, it’s just child Bruce Wayne, so you can’t even say there’s anything TO contrast Joker with because there is no hero!”

To which I say “Unfortunately, as we will delve into later, that was kind of the point. This is supposed to be an “anti-comic book movie” whatever the hell that means. Which like, cute, but as has been established before in many different adaptations: you cannot have the Joker without Batman, and vice versa. They complete each other. It’s so ingrained into our culture that when you think of one, you automatically think of the other. So even though Batman doesn’t make an appearance in this film, per se, you still think of him. You still watch his origin just as much as Joker’s. The very idea of Batman haunts Joker as a character even here, so there is always something to compare him to.

Now, sit down and finish your chips while I finish the review.”)

Now, here’s the thing, the elephant in the room: the Joker as a character in general is not well, like I said earlier. I don’t bring up this topic to insinuate that the Joker should be presented without a mental illness of some sort because, I mean one, that would maybe be even more horrifying, and two, it just wouldn’t make sense. But when you have a character like this who is well-known in his mythos as a villain, you have to keep presenting him as such. Sure, be honest about his mental state, but make it clear that it doesn’t excuse any of his behavior.

The Joker here is applauded for being a murderer. He’s glorified for starting a violent movement he didn’t even mean to. He’s turned into a symbol for a revolution that riots and kills in the streets. By the end, the Joker is shown that he’s fully and wholly accepted for who he is, which sounds sweet and endearing until you remember all the people he murdered in the film. It’s what he always craved, but it’s disgusting to watch.

Maybe that’s the point. But didn’t the Aurora movie theatre shooter claim he was dressed as the Joker? Mm. Yeah. How do we feel about all those people who claim they relate to the Joker from this film now?

(“But wait!” I hear you say, again, “is that even true? And I’m sure that wasn’t the intention of the filmmakers!”

“First of all,” I respond, “you are correct on both counts: the quote about him comparing himself to the Joker has since been debunked. But as this article discusses, one of the parents of the victims said that “Joker, which centers on the isolated and mentally ill antihero who becomes Batman’s eventual archnemesis, is ‘like a slap in the face.'”

Regardless of intention of the filmmakers, this was a real-life event that will always be tied to the franchise. Seems a little tasteless to uphold and justify violence, especially gun violence, as the film does. Warner Bros. Can claim that it “believes that one of the functions of storytelling is to provoke difficult conversations around complex issues” as much as it wants, but at the end of the day, this character is accepted by society for murdering multiple people. Warner Bros. Made a lot of money off this film, and really? That’s what they care about. That’s all they care about.

You want more proof? Because Joker made almost $1 billion on opening weekend, there are already talks about a sequel.

So much for “provoking difficult conversations.”)

THE “PLOT TWISTS” THING

Ugh.

So, you know how media lately is doing this thing where it’s like: “plot twists that absolutely no one sees coming are more important than a plot that makes sense and characters that act the way we wrote them originally??? :D”

It’s gross, but Joker doesn’t do that. At least, I don’t think it did? Maybe? I’m still trying to figure it out.

It felt very much like the film was trying to primarily be a “character study” of sorts, which meant the character-building scenes like Fleck chasing down and then being beaten by the kids in the beginning, handing the card that explains his laughter condition to the woman in the bus, and rehearsing his appearance on the talk show all set a certain tone, and they all belonged in that tone. It’s slow and layered and filled with subtext; it says so much more in the silence than it does in the lines from the script. Most of the film is like that. Fleck dying his hair messily? Yep. Fleck dancing down the stairs in full Joker regalia? Yep. Fleck crying in his clown makeup? Mhm. It’s all very artsy, character-driven, and slow.

Which is why it felt so out of place to suddenly have scenes filled with random, out-of-nowhere plot twists. Guess what?? Fleck is actually the secret brother of BRUCE WAYNE!!! Ooooooh!! Oh–no, wait, maybe he isn’t….becAUSE HIS MOM ACTUALLY ADOPTED HIM AND SHE’S EVEN MORE INSANE THAN HE IS!!!!! Did she ever have an affair with the head of Wayne Industries??? Who cares, that’s not important. Oh ALSO–remember his girlfriend?? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH HE ACTUALLY IMAGINED THAT ENTIRE RELATIONSHIP AND THEY’VE BARELY SPOKEN TWO SENTENCES TO EACH OTHER. WOW.

Once the plot-twist bug bit, the entire second half of the film felt like whiplash. Scenes of sudden and intense plot-development were interspersed with those calmer, character-driven silent scenes, and just when you got used to that, BAM. SLAPPED IN THE FACE WITH ANOTHER PLOT TWIST. WOW.

There’s a time and place for all of that, and I think there’s way to have a largely character-study-driven film involve all of that, but it never felt consistent here. It largely felt like the director wanted you to be just as confused as Arthur Fleck was, and like I guess if that was the point then good job? But it didn’t make for an enjoyable experience, and I’m also not entirely convinced that was the point. It feels like that would take some real forethought and based off of interviews with the director, I’m not sure much of that went into this film.

THE POLITICAL ALLEGORY THING

Hooooo boy.

We live in a time of political turmoil. Them’s just the facts. This climate is echoed in Hollywood in various ways, and sometimes I think it works, aaaaand sometimes I think it doesn’t.

The thing about including a political allegory in your film is that you kinda have to make it clear which side you’re on. We live at a time when there are two very staunchly opposed sides to every argument, and if you’re not going to clearly pick one, you have to at least make the allegory obvious regardless so it actually comes across like you intended. Or maybe you had zero intentions and just wanted to make a “not-comic book movie” because ha ha, the Joker is ~cool~ and ~edgy~.

Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark was very clearly on one particular side, it made it clear, and del Toro has not shied away from his intention in interviews. Us was filled with so much that it was intentional for the viewer to work out all the various allegories and theories on their own. Jojo Rabbit made its point clear in probably the most blatantly obvious way possible: Hitler is literally Sparta-kicked through a window!

What constantly annoys me about Joker is that it felt like it was really trying to play around with this whole political allegory idea, but without being too obvious about it–that or it wanted to stuff so many different allegories and ideas into one plot line that the whole thing just emerged as a muddled mess.

For example–one of the topics you could say that it tackles is the lack of funding and awareness for mental health. Cool, okay…but what’s the point? What is it saying is the answer? The loss of his therapist certainly didn’t help Fleck, but it also didn’t serve as the tipping point, either. Is it meant to just be one building block? Okay, but then why spend so much time on it? Why have his therapist even be a character at all, considering she barely did anything–her whole point was to sit at a desk so that Fleck could have someone to bounce his insane ideas off of, but he could have just as easily been talking to himself, that’s how helpful she was. So is the idea that if Fleck had had access to better help for his mental state, none of this would have happened? Okay, but that wasn’t clear at all, because he still had the issue of the gun he was given, his horrendous coworkers, his total lack of social life, his idealization of a famous person….

Okay, so then maybe what the film tackles is this whole rich vs. poor narrative. After all, the rich people in this film were total assholes, right? Fleck emerged as a sort of evil Robin Hood clown to save the people! Cool, sure, except there are problems with that narrative, too: Fleck murdered people. Lots of people. Not all of them rich assholes. And are you really saying that the environment in Gotham was such that that many poor people celebrated the murder of three innocent Wall Street-esque workers? Or, is that your point, that poor people are so dangerous and soulless that they will completely relish in the murder of the rich, so much so that they will start an entire clown movement?

(Yeah, it’s not lost on me that the poor people rioters were all wearing clown masks at the end–haha, they’re all clowns for following the Joker, hilarious)

Hmmm, okay, so maybe what it’s really digging at is that mental illness is the problem, not the guns. Okay. Yeah….except, as stated in the film, Fleck has been mentally ill his whole life. He didn’t murder anyone until he got his hands on a gun.

Well, okay, maybe it didn’t intend to have any sort of political allegory at all.

That’s my best answer at this point, except there was so much scattered throughout the film that could easily be labeled AS political allegory, it doesn’t feel like an accident.

But it’s certainly not clear–it’s a mess. And it’s a damn shame, because as I’ve stated, Joaquin Phoenix did amazing work for this. Damn.

THE “ROMANCE” THING

This is a minor thing in terms of plot, but I just have to get it out there: A huge chunk of the film, we are led to believe that Fleck is carrying on a successful, steamy relationship with one of his neighbors.

One of the big “plot twists” I guess is that oh, oh wow, he imagined that entire thing??? Whaaaaaaa??? (I assume it’s supposed to be surprising because there’s an entire slow motion montage that reveals it)

But like, I assumed from the get go it had to be fake or she had to be crazy, because I’m sorry, but it’s so incredibly unbelievable that a woman living alone with her daughter, let alone a woman of color living alone with her daughter, would ask absolutely no questions about her neighbor she’s spoken to twice and maybe flirted with once showing up at her doorstep looking completely bedraggled and covered in clown makeup AND THEN HE STARTS MAKING OUT WITH HER AND SHE’S LIKE “THIS IS FINE.”

But, sure, oh wow how shocking I did not see that coming at allllllll.

THE COMIC BOOK THING

So here’s the thing about the Joker: he’s a comic book character.

Wow, I know we all knew that, but anyway.

I don’t claim to be a DC expert by any stretch of the imagination–I watch the movies sometimes, I remember watching the animated Batman series in the morning before Winx Club or something, but I don’t really follow the comics.

Still, I was curious about how “accurate” this movie was to the original lore, and, shocker, it’s not. Or, well, not…really?

Apparently, from what I can gather, the Joker doesn’t really have a “set” backstory. There’s no universal explanation for why he is the way he is, unlike Bruce Wayne (rich, parents killed in an ally, ~the batcave~, etc.). In fact, apparently he is quoted saying in The Killing Joke (apparently a controversial graphic novel version of a potential origin story for the Joker) “Sometimes I remember it one way, sometimes another…if I’m going to have a past, I prefer it to be multiple choice!”

Which, sure, that’s funky and interesting for one of the most iconic villains of all time. I can get down with it. And in that spirit of things, really any attempt at an “origin story” for the Joker can have almost entirely free reign, can’t it?

Every quote I’ve seen from the charming director of this film has had the same spirit of “I didn’t actually want to make a comic book movie, I didn’t bother reading anything about the character, hahah I guess that will make people mad oh well” (he must be suuuuper fun at parties). There are two interesting things about this mindset:

1. THE JOKER IS LITERALLY A COMIC BOOK VILLAIN??

You literally cannot make a movie about a villain, from comic books, without it being a comic book movie?? Sure you can take out the DC logo and make it all “dark and broody and dramatic and character-driven” BUT HE’S STILL A COMIC BOOK CHARACTER AND ALWAYS WILL BE.

If you want to make some sort of dramatic character study story about someone dealing with mental illness that focuses on classism and violence and whatever else but you don’t want it to be a “comic book movie” MAKE YOUR OWN ORIGINAL STORY THEN?? Clearly you have ideas so use that?? Do you not trust that your own ideas would get you very far? RIP to you I guess???

2. Joke’s on you (pun intended) because you literally STILL made a comic book movie

Despite the insistence that no attention was paid to the lore of Gotham or Batman or whatever, there’s a whole lot in here. The Joker, once stepping into that role by the end, looks exactly like you expect from the comics, there are no changes. There is still a huge point made to show Bruce Wayne’s own origin story. Still set in Gotham. It’s a dark tale, certainly, but it doesn’t stray far enough from the lore to be considered “not a comic book movie.” It is. Through and through.

Oops?

THE “STORY” THING

Despite the amazing cinnamontography and the incredible work done by Joaquin Phoenix, I still left the theatre feeling like I’d wasted a good couple hours of my life.

Here’s the thing about an origin story for a well-known character: the ending is spoiled from the get-go. We don’t go to these movies wondering how it will end, because we know. We go because the how is so much more powerful. We go to see what changed in Tony Stark’s life to lead him to fight the very weapons he grew up endorsing. We go to see what exactly made Wonder Woman defend humanity when she started out knowing so little about it. We go to see (hopefully) what simultaneously made and broke Black Widow.

We go in already knowing a big chunk of the story, but we don’t have the full picture. We want it, though, because we want answers. We want to know why someone behaves the way they do. We can guess, sure, but it’s so much more satisfying when there’s an explanation set in stone, especially one with twists that may be surprising but ultimately make sense in the end.

I don’t know what I was hoping for from Joker, but it felt ultimately like a letdown. It was like they looked at the character, thought “okay, so we have to explain this”, and then promptly took the easiest route. Why is the Joker insane? Because #mentalillness. That’s it.

Obviously the Joker has some kind of mental illness, something is clearly not right, but we never learn exactly what that is from this film. The whole thing felt like a cop-out, because it was predictable from the get go. Of course he gets fired from his shitty job. Of course the talk show host makes fun of him. Obviously he’s imagining the romance. No duh he starts killing people with the gun he was given.

The one moment of the story that felt fresh was the idea that the Joker and Batman were actually BROTHERS. But they couldn’t even let us have that because soon it was revealed that oh, no, that’s a lie actually, all made up by Fleck’s also-insane mother. How is he gonna handle this?? He kills her, obviously. Duh.

I wouldn’t even be as bothered by the cop-out if it didn’t also feel like the film was trying to make some bigger statement about…something. But what? What exactly is the commentary on society??

As mentioned before, if the commentary is meant to be classism, it doesn’t do this effectively because our main character is imprinted in our brains as a villain. You can say it’s not a comic book movie, but he is a comic book character. He’s a comic book villain. So are we supposed to root for the poor people? The ones he represents? The ones who cheer for him murdering people on live TV? Or are we supposed to cheer for the rich, the ones who get slaughtered mercilessly? But they were mostly assholes throughout the entire film??

If your goal is to make some sort of classism commentary, in our society, you have to pick a side. If your goal is to present the rich as the villains, then you have to make your comic book villain one of them.

Think of all the rich asshats in power right now. Think of the things they say and get away with. It’s confusing and frustrating and all we can think is that something has to be wrong with them, right?

Imagine, if you will, a Joker origin story where the Joker is a well-off rich kid. Something is still wrong with him, because, you know, it’s the Joker, but he’s rich, so he always gets away with things. He has easy access to weapons because he has money. He dresses as a clown and no one questions it because he has money. In fact, people applaud him as a “self-made man” because of it. Sure he shoots people on live TV, but what about those rioters in the streets protesting him?? How DARE they???

If the Joker doesn’t even know his own origin story, that’s a route you can take with it, isn’t it?

“But doesn’t it make Batman and Joker’s rivalry less powerful since they’re both rich now?” Oh, I’m sorry, I thought this “wasn’t a comic book movie” so why are we even asking about Batman? But if we are, wouldn’t it just frustrate Joker even more if Batman was just as rich as he but actually liked by people? Wouldn’t it encourage us even more if there was a rich guy who WASN’T an asshat?

“But how would I relate to the Joker then??” Uh, please don’t?

“But…but the lore!” If someone who doesn’t care at all for the lore can make a movie like this, so can I.

“Okay fine so just make your own movie then!!” Okay.

SHOULD YOU TAKE YOURSELF TO SEE THIS MOVIE?

If you can separate the acting and the cinnamontography from the awful and confusing story, then sure.

Otherwise, skip it. I have yet to hear or read a convincing argument in favor of this movie. We all have different tastes, sure, I acknowledge that. I genuinely think I may have enjoyed this more if it wasn’t a Joker movie. Or if it was a Joker movie that actually added anything to the lore.

But I swear if this gets Oscar-picked over Us, Knives Out, and Booksmart, I will organize clown riots in the streets.

But nothing matters except for money, so it will win awards. And there will be sequels. And lots of people talking about how “dark” and “risky” and “impressive” they all are. Yaaaaaaay.

(EDIT: published without posting the rATING THAT’S THE BEST PART WHY AM I LIKE THIS)

All in all, I give Joker…

1/5 UNIMPRESSED CLOWNS!!

FAVORITE MOMENT

Either the opening with Fleck putting on his clown makeup and faking a smile while a tear rolled down because wow, why wasn’t the whole movie like that, or when Fleck sneaks into his neighbor’s apartment and it’s revealed by her reaction that he’s imagined their entire relationship. It was the one moment that was actually believable. Also, he didn’t kill her, so yay.

“OOF” MOMENT

Everything else, really.

TRAILERS TO WATCH OUT FOR

Perhaps none of these, really, but let’s talk about them.

I guess it should have been a red flag that basically all of the trailers felt like they were for complete and total male power fantasies, but I’m a hopeful person.

Tenet is the next Christopher Nolan thing, so I’m actually slightly hopeful. Not incredibly, but at least slightly.

Ford v Ferrari is bound to be the next male-led, safe-topic, unoriginal Oscar winner, so while I likely won’t be seeing it anytime soon, I’m sure I’ll have to talk about it eventually. Cars fast.

Jumanji: The Next Level has the potential to be either really good, or really meh.

If I have to see one more trailer for 1917, I may riot. It’s another glory-war movie that will win all the sound design awards for some reason–because ooOoOOOOoooh, wAr.

While I have no real desire to see Uncut Gems, I will say that it actually looks kind of fascinating idea-wise. I mean, good on Sandler for bringing some goofiness to a rather serious-looking role and have it…work?

What is The Gentlemen. Why is it happening. It’s all guns and gangs and violence but it’s okay they all have well-pressed suits and have beautiful women on their arms, therefore it’s “gentlemanly.” Talk about a male power fantasy?? ALSO MATTHEW MCCONAUGHEY AND COLIN FARRELL WHAT ARE YOU DOING IN THIS MOVIE. STOP IT. NO.

Well, that does it for this review! Next we’ll be touching on some other flicks I’m late on, like Last Christmas (crying), Frozen 2 (more crying), Jojo Rabbit (SO MUCH CRYING), and Knives Out (wowowowowowow).

Look, if you like Joker, that’s fine. We probably won’t be best friends anytime soon, but who knows if we’d even want to be. I don’t know you, I don’t know your life.

I mean maybe you also really liked Alita: Battle Angel in which case I really don’t think we’d be friends, so…

Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark REVIEW

Guillermo del Toro and Jordan Peele own my soul and tbh, I’m completely fine with that.

So now that it’s November and almost Thanksgiving, it’s time to finally talk about spooky things!!

So…a while ago, idk, I took myself to the movies (because all my friends are WIMPS jk I love them) and saw Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark.

Like many others, I have fond, fond sleepover memories of staying up late to read from the classic books and then not sleeping at all because…well, yeah. Those drawings alone were nightmare fuel for WEEKS.

So I was already excited when the trailer first dropped for this movie, but then I learned that Guillermo del Toro was involved??? And all of the monsters were being done with practical effects and costumes and makeup and very little CG???? Ahhhhhhhh??????????

So I was like, mildly excited I guess.

I actually did some research before going to see this, mostly to watch how the actors were fitted into their monster costumes so I wasn’t completely horrified when I saw it in the theatre. I was still mildly horrified, but it helped to know that there was a contortionist in there somewhere instead of just an actual monster. I think.

THE PLOT

It’s Halloween in a small town, which means all the best and worst stuff happens. We follow a ragtag group of misfit kids–Stella, Ramón, Auggie, and Chuck (eventually joined by Chuck’s older sister Ruth) as they prank local jerk boy Tommy and manage to escape, hiding out in a haunted house, of course. The legend of the house surrounds a girl named Sarah Bellows, who apparently wrote scary stories in blood in order to punish those who wronged her or made fun of her or were basically just rude (and then the stories became REEEEEAAAAAAL).

Naturally, because Stella is an aspiring writer and lover of scary stories, she takes Sarah’s legendary book with her when they leave the house. It’s all fine and dandy until Stella notices that new stories are appearing…and they’re about people she knows.

What follows is a race against time as Stella works to solve the mystery of what was really going on with Sarah Bellows and her family before Sarah steals everyone Stella loves and turns them into nothing more than various scary stories to tell in the dark.

THE REVIEW

I can very happily and very seriously say that I genuinely loved this movie. It felt like all my favorite parts of Stranger Things, IT, Are You Afraid of the Dark?, Goosebumps, Until Dawn, and The Final Girls combined. There’s just something about kids banding together to work out why creepy things are happening and to hopefully save everyone they can. I think it’s one reason why I like YA dystopian novels so much–nothing proves quite so well how powerful young people are than showing them facing off against the impossible and winning.

I’ve seen some mixed reviews for this film, and I get it. I think if you’re unfamiliar with the source material books, you don’t have quite the same experience watching it. I mean the first time they showed the scarecrow? I instantly knew how many people in the theater had read the books because of that reaction alone. That’s the first monster we see, and it’s literally like they ripped him right off the page and stuck him on the screen.

It’s absolutely horrifying and completely amazing.

I’ve also seen some complaints about the ending (we’ll get to that) and the political commentary (we’ll get to that as well). All valid points, I understand, but also like…y’all did you SEE the Pale Lady??? How can you complain about anything ever again after seeing her????? She’s precious????????

But I digress.

I loved this movie. I really did. So what about it specifically made me enjoy it so much?

(I also introduced the idea in my The Lion King 2019 REVIEW that a good category for some movies is simply “a damn good time” and I think I’d also argue that this one falls in that category as well–I think there’s a little more to be said for this one, and I think you can pull much more from it, but I also understand why someone wouldn’t necessarily be wild about it. I don’t get it personally, but I understand)

THE CHARACTERS

All of these kids are precious beans and I love them with all my heart. Protect them!!!

Stella is a delightful protagonist. Can we talk about how she wears glasses?? And how she wears glasses the entire time??? She’s a romantic interest and a leading lady with GLASSES????? And the detail in the final confrontation where she lost her glasses and we saw how everything was frustratingly blurry through her eyes and you had no idea where or what the ghost was because of that???????? AHHHHHHHHH?????

I started to write a separate blurb for each of the kids and realized I was just saying the same thing. Ramón? Precious bean. Protect him. Auggie? Precious bean. Protect him. Chuck? Precious bean. Protect him. Ruth? Precious bean. Protect her.

That’s not to say that I don’t feel like each of the kids wasn’t a good separate character. They each clearly had their things–Auggie is a tall bean who was initially more of a scaredy-cat (also, he should really stop eating toes), Chuck was more of a prankster before his initial haunted house encounter and then I just…protect him, Ruth was a little more obsessed with being the popular, cool girl (but then everything changed when the Fire Nation attacked–I MEAN when her brother disappeared) and Ramón….IS PRECIOUS AND AMAZING AND SO STRONG FOR A KID AND PLEASE DON’T MAKE HIM GO TO VIETNAM, PLEASE.

…I’m fine. This is fine.

The other characters I generally enjoyed as well. We’ll get more into Sarah Bellows when we discuss that horrific haunted house scene with Stella, but I generally felt like I liked and cared for all of the characters, and I wanted them to be okay.

Except for Tommy. I mean maybe he didn’t deserve getting all scarecrowed, but he was the worst.

THE MUSIC

The MUSIC. FAIR TOWNSPEOPLE, THE MUSIC.

The full score album is finally showing up on Spotify, and it looks like everything was composed by Marco Beltrami and Anna Drubich, and it’s AMAZING.

There’s a delightfully eerie music box theme that plays primarily where Sarah Bellows herself is concerned, and it’s GREAT. The first track in the soundtrack plays a lot of that theme, and then it transforms into this whimsical extravaganza that reminds me a lot of something Danny Elfman would write.

Of course, the music also involves some non-score songs, most notably two different versions of “Season of the Witch” which is FANTASTIC.

I mean…not to be that person that just says over and over that it’s GREAT but like…genuinely…it’s so good, y’all. Please look it up and enjoy it for yourself. Listen to it while you read the rest of this review!

THE MONSTERS

BRUH. THE MONSTERS.

Like I mentioned earlier, I watch a little “behind-the-scenes” clip that showed the various actors getting into costume for the monsters, so I was semi-prepared, but WOW. Seeing them on the big screen? Delightful. Horrifying, but delightful.

I think part of it was just my prior experiences with the books, but oh wow, I felt like a kid again watching those monsters come to life. So much love and attention went into each and every creature, and the setting that surrounded them, and the story they came from, it was almost like a different episode of a show when each monster arrived because the tone would change so much.

Each monster was delightfully unique even in the ways they moved (part of which I’m sure was just the costumes, but oh wow did it really add to things). I just…like I can’t even pick a favorite because they were all so delightful in different ways.

…okay, delightful may be a weird way to describe them, but the work that went into them just…AHHHHHH.

Anyway. In my opinion, the monsters were incredible. In some ways I feel like Sarah Bellows herself was the least scary monster–which I actually think is appropriate, considering her backstory.

Speaking of…

THE REAL MONSTERS

Just like our favorite cartoon involving a bunch of kids solving mysteries and a talking dog, the real monster was the awful side of humanity all along. Whether it was Sarah’s absolutely horrendous family, Resident Mean Kid Tommy and his goon gang, or just the charming reality that was the Vietnam War and the draft, the scariest and saddest parts of the film were the actions taken by the human characters. Sure, the toeless corpse dragged Auggie into the void under his bed. And yeah, the Pale Lady hugged Chuck into…oblivion, and sure, Tommy got turned into a scarecrow.

But you go into it knowing all of that is fake. You know they’re just what the title announces–scary stories to tell in the dark. But the Vietnam War? That was real. The racism that fuels Tommy and his friends to bully Ramón and anyone who interacts with him? That is real. Even Sarah Bellows, a fictional character, was inspired by true stories of her time, and we’re forced to experience it as if it was real because we see her story through Stella’s eyes.

Stella is a character we have been with from the very beginning of the film, so we are, in essence, forced to relate to her and feel for her. Sure, she makes a really, really poor choice by taking the haunted book in the first place. She spends the rest of the film desperately trying to make up for it, and every time she loses someone, we feel that, too. We want her to make it out if only because by the end, she’s lost almost everything. So when she gets transported to an alternate reality where she has to experience life as Sarah Bellows, we feel it that much more. The way she gets treated as Sarah is jarring because we know it’s a real experience for some kids–getting dragged off screaming, her hair pulled out as she’s ripped away from safety, tossed into a cold, dark room to rot…and all because she wanted to tell the horrible truth of what her family was really doing to get their money.

I think it’s important to note another crucial difference between the supernatural monsters like the Jangly Man and the Pale Lady and the human ones:

It is heavily implied that the supernatural monsters do not kill anyone. As noted at the end of the film, Stella is going on a quest to find Auggie and Chuck and bring them back because they’re still out there somewhere. They’re alive, despite their direct contact with the various beasts. “But what about Tommy?” I hear your skeptical brain saying, “doesn’t he get turned into a scarecrow?” Yep. He sure does. And you could definitely make the argument that if he is dead, he kinda deserves it because wow, what a horrible person. But really, we don’t know if he’s alive or dead. He looks just like the scarecrow who turned him. Maybe he is still alive. Maybe he isn’t. The film doesn’t explicitly say.

The human monsters, on the other hand? They do kill. Sarah’s horrendous family are directly responsible for her death. The Vietnam War? Yeah. That goes without saying.

I find it endlessly fascinating that the fates of the various boys throughout the film serve as a metaphor for what happened during the Vietnam War–children going missing all over the place, and sometimes, maybe it felt like nobody cared.

Perhaps the saddest thing that all this implies is that while Auggie, Chuck, and maybe even Tommy are somehow alive and well (okay, maybe not “well”), Ramón is the only character we see go off to war.

Despite facing the Jangly Man and winning, he still ends up going to war. And because of what we know of history, it’s safe to say that Ramón may be the only character actually in danger of dying. The Vietnam War wasn’t some supernatural beast you could write off in a magical book. Despite everything, and despite Stella’s best wishes and hopes, it’s likely he’ll die.

That’s the true horror of this scary movie. And maybe that’s why it’s received less-than-favorable reviews–it forces you to think about the violence you’re facing and maybe even enjoying onscreen by making you really think about a real-life horrific event. We don’t want to think about all that when we go see a scary movie, we just want to think about jumpscares and fake characters who won’t last and dorky monsters and so-so special effects! No reality for us, thanks!

It’s kind of sad, honestly. And it’s a shame that potential, true works of art like Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark are suffering for it because critics would rather rave about “Tony Stark’s incredible sacrifice, and why are all the feminists complaining again when there was an entire like 30 seconds of just the female superheroes onscreen doing absolutely nothing but damn did it look cool?” Or “this movie about a robot girl treated her like an object the entire time and then just proved its point about women even more by having her literally refuse to feel things ever again because oh god no her boyfriend died like seven times but wow was it pretty” *cough*ALITABATTLEANGEL*cough*.

We don’t want to like movies, books, or any type of entertainment where we see ourselves reflected in the monsters. But it’s only when we do that that we’re able to grow and change and prevent senseless things like the Vietnam War from happening ever again. We can save Ramón–we just keep choosing not to.

SHOULD YOU TAKE YOURSELF TO SEE THIS MOVIE?

Despite your personal problems with the film (which I’ve seen range from “it wasn’t scary enough!” To “they shouldn’t have tried so obviously to set it up for a sequel” to “I didn’t get it”), you have to admit that what was attempted was a beautiful, intricate, interwoven plot that tried to blur the lines between the fake monsters and the real ones. It tried to be more than just a typical scary movie full of jumpscares, fake effects, and a plot that makes no sense (I’M LOOKING AT YOU, PET SEMATARY). Now, maybe for you, it didn’t read quite right. Maybe it didn’t work. That’s totally fine and understandable, because it’s going to be a different experience for everyone. For me, it read really, really well. The parallels between today’s political environment and that of the time around the Vietnam War was jarring and impressive, and I appreciated them. Maybe you didn’t.

When I started this review, I was of the mindset of “yeah, I really loved it, but I can see how it wouldn’t be for everyone.” I’m still of that mindset, but it’s nevertheless frustrating when a movie you really enjoyed gets written off so easily. And maybe some people feel that way when I constantly make fun of Alita: Battle Angel. That’s fair.

I think what I would say is that if you’re someone who normally decides what to see based off what the mainstream critics say, maybe don’t this time. Now, if you know about yourself that you don’t like scary things? That’s something else. You do you, boo. But if this was one that maybe you were excited about and then the reviews came out and you kinda went “oh…never mind, I guess…” I would ask you to give it a chance. It’s lovely, in an eerie, creepy sort of way.

Overall, I give Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark…

4.5/5 HAUNTED STORYBOOKS WRITTEN IN BLOOD!!!

Because of COURSE they’re written in blood.

FAVORITE MOMENT

Will I ever be over Ramón and Stella fighting to get back to each other in the same house but trapped in different dimensions/times? No.

“OOF” MOMENT

Listen. That stupid pimple story that is actually spiders? The worst thing ever. The moment where she pulls on it and a gazillion spiders swarm out of her face? -27/10, do NOT recommend.

TRAILERS TO WATCH OUT FOR:

Have I already talked about IT: Chapter Two? If not, here it is: I won’t be seeing it. In concept I’m all about creepy shapeshifters and kids fighting them off with friendship or something, but hey how about that slaughter of gay people in the opening scene??? Yeah???? Yeah??????? No.

When the trailer for Knives Out first started, I genuinely thought they’d finally made a good movie of my favorite book. Alas, that was incorrect, but it looks cool nonetheless and I’m interested. Unless I missed it. Did I miss it? Probably.

Black and Blue looks absolutely fascinating. Not a relaxing outing to the movies by any means, but maybe a really important one.

Don’t Let Go looks like the kind of supernatural-ish thriller that will make me sob. There are GHOSTS. Or maybe it’s just time travel. Anyway, what a fascinating concept–I hope it’s good!!

That about does it for this review!! Please consider giving Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark a chance–it truly is a beautiful and rather poignant scary story (if you are worried about the scare factor, I would say if you like Stranger Things, you’ll definitely like this film–I’d rate them about the same on the Scare Scale. I don’t actually have a Scare Scale but it sounds cool).

Pet Sematary (2019) REVIEW

So…you know how sometimes, you get this idea, like “oh I know, I’ll treat myself to something that will allow me to see a lot of movies! I love movies! And hey, maybe I’ll start a movie blog, so I can nerd out about them!! YEAH!!!”

…and then you realize that means you have to see things like Pet Sematary.

Now, let’s reiterate: I am not a horror movie person. At all.

“But you said you saw Us three times!! That’s a horror movie!!” Yes. I did. And did it scar me? Ohhhhhh you BET. But I don’t consider Us a horror movie in the most traditional sense–it doesn’t throw things at the screen just for the sake of scaring you and that’s it. There’s so much more to it than just scares.

(If you’re curious, check out my in-depth review of Us right here)

Pet Sematary, on the other hand. Whew.

I know I didn’t technically have to see it, but if I’m gonna have a movie blog, I think I have to check out big things when I can. Maybe I won’t like it *cough*ALITABATTLEANGEL*cough*, but I still think it’s important to see it and figure out why I feel the way I do about it.

Maybe that’s just an excuse for my 4-ness…

Probably.

Anyway, here’s the thing: this is not a nice, happy movie. This thing is dark. I’m gonna try to humor my way through it as much as possible because I’m pretty sure that’s the only way I’ll survive this, but keep that in mind.

Originally, I was gonna try to write a cheerier version of the review after the gruesome detailed one, but I don’t know if that’s even gonna work, y’all.

So just be warned. This isn’t a fun time in any way.

I mean…there are cats! Yayyyyyy!

THE PLOT

The movie, which should really be called “White People Mess With Native American Burial Ground, Get What’s Coming To Them,” begins with an aerial shot of a forest, and as we zoom across the land, we see a building on fire. As we zoom in some more, we see a large house, a car parked in front with an open door, and a trail of blood going across the front porch. No one is in sight.

The screen changes to white, and we catch up with the Creed family: husband Louis (Jason Clarke), wife Rachel (Amy Seimetz), daughter Ellie (Jeté Laurence), and son Gage (Hugo and Lucas Lavoie). They’re moving to the town of Ludlow, Maine from Boston to get a fresh start. They seem to be a really close family, and all seems well until they arrive at their new house. A large truck goes loudly speeding by, scaring everyone.

The next day, Louis is off for work at the university (?) as the on-campus doctor. Rachel, Ellie, and Gage are staying home. Ellie and Rachel notice a procession of kids in real creepy animal masks walk by, with what appears to be a dead dog in a wheelbarrow. Ellie is immediately intrigued, and wants to follow them, but she waits until Rachel is distracted with a phone call.

Ellie follows the trail through the woods and winds up at a “charming little landmark” (Rachel’s words): the infamous Pet Sematary. She walks around for a bit, investigating the different graves, until she comes across what almost looks like a dam of sorts. Determined, she starts to climb it, but is startled and therefore stopped by neighbor Jud Crandall (John Lithgow). Ellie is stung by a bee on her way down, and Jud helps her remove the stinger and put dirt on it (because that’s…how you fix things…that or Windex).

Meanwhile, Rachel is on the phone with her own mom, unpacking things while she talks. She comes across a photo of a girl, and although she reacts negatively to the photo, we don’t find out why until a little later. Noticing Ellie isn’t in the house anymore, she goes searching, coming across the Pet Sematary and Ellie and Jud within it. Rachel thinks Jud’s a little sketchy at first (and the Pet Sematary is real creepy), so she grabs Ellie and gets out (now her mistake here is not getting out of Ludlow altogether which is really what she should have done).

That night, Ellie tries to ask her parents some questions about death (“why don’t pets live as long as people?”), but Rachel and Louis are clearly on different pages about this particular topic and the whole conversation ends up being kind of a muddled mess.

Then, we cut to Halloween. Louis is getting ready to take Ellie and some of her friends trick-or-treating, when he sees Jud motioning for him across the drive. Louis goes to him, and Jud shows him what he found: Ellie’s beloved cat, Church, dead on the side of the road. In a rather Anna Karenina-esque twist, Church was hit and killed by one of the trucks that’s always speeding across the road. Louis immediately decides that Ellie cannot see this, so Jud tells him they’ll deal with it that night.

Louis tells Rachel what they found, and Rachel begs Louis not to tell Ellie that Church is dead, just that he ran away. Louis seems reluctant at first, but decides to go along with it. That night, Louis and Jud head out to the Pet Sematary. Just before Louis can start digging the grave, however, something seems to come over Jud, and he asks things like “Ellie really loved that cat, didn’t she?” And “you really love Ellie, don’t you?”

Like yes, Jud, we all loved everyone, you gonna help bury the cat or nah?

But instead, Jud takes Louis over the dam/stick wall thing that Ellie tried to climb earlier, up across a swamp, and on top of some mountain-y thing where he tells Louis to bury the cat and use some of the nearby rocks as a cairn. It’s especially dramatic looking with the lightning striking every now and then.

The next day, Louis and Rachel sit Ellie down to tell her that Church ran away. Ellie says “but he’s right here!” Which is just not what you ever want to hear about a dead cat. Louis goes to investigate, and sure enough, Church is inside Ellie’s closet, alive and well.

Well…alive, at least.

But Church is different. He’s angrier, nastier, bites and scratches everyone. He brings a dead bird onto Louis and Rachel’s bed and starts eating it. He’s all bedraggled and sticky.

Louis, fed up with this, drives Church up to the end of the road and leaves him there.

We cut to Ellie’s birthday party, which she’s having a hard time enjoying because she feels guilty about Church running away again. But just when all hope seems lost, she spots Church casually walking down the road. Naturally, she runs after him, just in time for another one of those giant trucks to ruin everything.

With Ellie gone, Louis now must decide what he wants to do. He knows of a great power in the woods, something that could give him more time with his daughter, but Jud warned him: they don’t come back the same.

THE REVIEW

So…yeah.

I mean, I really loved Us, right? So maybe I am a horror movie aficionado now!

Nope.

Now, there were moments during the film where I thought “hey that’s kind of interesting–where are they going with this?” Or “wow I actually kind of like this character, maybe they won’t–oh. And they’re dead. Well.”

But generally, as I left the theatre, I was just kinda…numb. I genuinely couldn’t decide how I felt about it. I mean I got home and turned on every light possible, I think, and I started writing this review, but I couldn’t do it. I had to let it sit for a couple of days while my brain calmed down and my heart stopped racing every time I heard a noise beCAUSE WHAT IF IT’S DEMON ELLIE AHHHHHHHHHHHH–

Here’s the thing: I generally don’t like dark, depressing endings. Generally. The exceptions normally come in cases where I feel the dark ending really served the plot, I got really attached to the characters, there’s some deeper, hidden meaning to take away, and/or I feel like the story would have suffered with a lighter ending. For example, in Us, the characters we followed were likable, there was absolutely a hidden meaning, and the twist was there to make us question everything and to make each re-watch different. I saw Cabaret for the first time this past weekend, and that is not a happy musical by any means. But there were great characters, a hidden meaning (especially in today’s world), and the dark ending serves to really make you think about your own actions. If Cabaret had a lighter ending, the entire show would have suffered for it because the point of the plot would have been lost. Odd Thomas is one of my absolute favorite books and the movie adaptation is great, and the ending is absolutely tragic. There is some hope attached to it, but largely, it kicks you in the gut. But again: the characters are great, the tragic ending served the plot and the character development really well, and I do think it wouldn’t be as powerful without what happens in the end.

Now I will also throw in that generally I can do darker endings if there’s some hope thrown in. Isn’t that the whole point of the escapism of media? Don’t we want to leave behind the tragedy of our own lives to live someone else’s for a while?

With movies like Pet Sematary, there is absolutely no hope at all. And that’s…kinda sucky.

I’m not saying there weren’t parts of it I enjoyed, and I’m not saying I didn’t find the overall plot kinda fascinating because I absolutely did; what I am saying is that the ending of a story is really important, and when you don’t give your audiences anything to grasp hold of and instead leave them with the feeling of pulling the rug out from under them and dropping them into a pit below…well, it feels kind of unfair. And I don’t think it did this to everyone; horror movie fans everywhere generally seemed to like the remake.

But the biggest plot twist of all was the major change to the ending of the source material, and I genuinely think the film really suffers for it.

Also it ends so abruptly that when the lights in the theater come back on, you don’t get a chance to come back to yourself beforehand. It doesn’t ease you out of its world at all, and maybe that’s intentional (to up the creep factor, I guess, although…really? Did you really need to? DID YOU WATCH YOUR OWN FILM??).

So let’s dig up the details of this gruesome flick and why I don’t think I’ll be a horror aficionado anytime soon–maybe just a Jordan Peele aficionado.

Major spoiler warning now in effect!!

THE MUSIC

I…really liked the music for this film.

While I definitely don’t watch a lot of horror movies, I do listen to a lot of movie music and can appreciate a good soundtrack. While there were certainly a lot of moments in this film that had the stereotypical “CACOPHONY OF STRINGED INSTRUMENTS MAKING SCARY NOISES!!” Moments, there was a lot to offer besides that.

For example, I have the soundtrack up on Spotify as I type this and it’s just…euhhh.

The first track, “Wendigo,” slowly builds to an absolute nightmare of a track. It plays a lot with certain instruments cutting in and out unnaturally, melodies that go back and forth in your headphones from one ear to another, and my favorite effect: a sound that could either be someone digging up a grave or someone walking unnaturally quickly through the dirt of a graveyard. If you knew nothing of the film it came from, you could still wager a guess based on the title and the track itself what it might mean and that’s amazing.

“The Maine Road” (GET IT BECAUSE IT’S A MAIN ROAD BUT IT TAKES PLACE IN MAINE??????) has a haunting little melody that probably sounds like a cheerful children’s tune in a major key, but as it is in a minor key…it just doesn’t sound right.

“Fielding Fine” is one of my favorite tracks because it’s beautiful–it could almost not be from a horror film, that’s how relaxed and pleasant-sounding it is. It sounds a little sad, maybe, but it’s just a pretty little tune that someone could dance to. I think this plays in the beginning when the family is driving to their new home, and everything, at least at that moment, is okay.

And of course, the final track (before the cover of the song “Pet Sematary” which was written for the original film) is morbidly named “Wasn’t the Beginning?” Because, as you’ll realize once you see the movie, the first shot of the film is actually the ending. Though there’s no text that explains “THREE DAYS EARLIER” or whatever, it all clicks into place once you reach the ending of the movie. The track itself is is a little less horror-movie typical, but it’s sad-sounding, and you feel it in your gut. The track sounds hopeless, like we couldn’t have changed the outcome even if we wanted to, and that sucks. It’s a good track, it’s just morbid what it represents. They even bring back the piano from “Fielding Fine” (though it’s not the exact same tune) just to make me go “well that’s just GREAT.”

Actually, “The Maine Road,” “Just Not the Same,” and “Wasn’t the Beginning?” All feature the same eerie melody in different ways. While “The Maine Road” introduces the tune, it’s purposely warped and messed up in “Just Not the Same” (it even ties into the title). In “Wasn’t the Beginning?” We get the same tune from “The Maine Road,” but it’s played on the piano–and the only other time we heard that instrument was in “Fielding Fine.” The music constantly plays with the tragedy of the story in this way, and it’s…I mean it’s great, but it’s also REAL sad.

Anyway, point being, I actually really, really like the music. It’s scary all on its own without being paired with a horror movie…and I genuinely think the music is better than the movie itself. But we’ll get into that.

THE CHARACTERS

THEY ALL SUCK.

They are the WORST. And I get it, it’s a horror movie, so don’t get attached to anyone anyway, right? If they’re all just gonna die, why make them likable?

But here’s the thing: the suspense was even higher in Us because the characters WERE likable. It was scarier because the thought of losing any of them was just as scary as what might kill them off to begin with.

I wanted to like the characters, I really did, but the movie doesn’t let you. And maybe that’s the point of it. If you know the original story, you know who does and doesn’t make it, so don’t bother getting attached to begin with.

I dunno. I think you can still make likable characters even if the audience knows their ultimate fate, but maybe that’s just me. Characters are an important part of the story for me, so I can’t help feeling like there was such a huge missed opportunity here.

But let’s go down the list, shall we?

Louis is…*sigh*.

In the opening car scene, he seems like he’ll be your typical goofy dad, but that image is quickly shattered. Louis is a doctor, and we learn that a big part of the reason the family moved to begin with is because Louis always worked the graveyard shift (which I guess is a reference to another Stephen King story called The Graveyard Shift) and never got to spend time with his family. You kind of get this impression from him, but you also get the impression that he does really love his family and he wants to do right by them–he just goes about it in the worst way possible.

As a doctor, Louis has a very detached view of death, and we can assume he’s seen a lot of it. But we see this view shaken when he’s unable to save the university student that gets hit by a car (really all I’m learning from this is that everyone in Maine needs to build some damn fences by the roads). He’s shaken by this, so even though he understands death and knows the science behind it, it still shakes him when it hits home, be it someone he’s unable to save or his own family.

He also seems to want to be the ideal dad, which means giving into his wife when she begs him not to tell Ellie about her cat being dead. He wants so desperately to be perfect that he naturally blames himself when Ellie dies. It’s this guilt that, combined with the power he now knows of in the woods, leads him to his absolute terrible decision to bring his daughter back to life.

Louis is frustrating because he’s just so, so stupid. I mean, he’s a doctor, a “man of science” or whatever, Mr. “dying is perfectly natural, Ellie”, so it’s so incredibly annoying when he turns his back on all of that to bring his daughter back despite knowing what bringing Church back did to both him and his family. Despite being presented as the character full of logic, he’s so quick to throw logic out the window once it gets personal.

And maybe that’s the point of his character, the idea that grief is such a powerful force it can make smart people do really, really dumb things, but that doesn’t mean I want to watch it. I mean, isn’t this what we all make fun of horror movies for? Someone hears a noise and they go investigate it despite us being like “NOOOOOO!!!”? Someone stays in a house that is clearly haunted instead of getting the eff out?? So why is it that Louis is presented as such a tragic character when he brought all of this on himself? He’s the reason the rest of his family doesn’t survive the film. If he’d just gone with Rachel and Gage when they’d left and stayed with the family he claimed he wanted to spend more time with in the first place, none of this would have happened. YOU KNOW IT’S TRUE.

Speaking of Rachel…..*sigh*.

The point of Rachel is that she’s just as bad at dealing with death as her husband is, and with their powers combined they are really just Parents of the Year.

Rachel’s backstory in a nutshell: when she was a kid, she had an older sister named Zelda. Zelda suffered from severe spinal meningitis, to the point where she almost didn’t look human anymore and she definitely couldn’t get out of bed. Now, you could have made some point about how Zelda’s illness was amplified in the eyes of a child, and maybe her appearance wasn’t as bad as Rachel believed, but she was a scared little girl (what was that movie about the kid whose dreams became real? Before I Wake? In that film, the big twist is that the evil villain all along was an amplified image of his mom who died from cancer, whom he called the “canker man.” That was a brilliantly tragic twist, but here, Zelda is reduced to jump scares and creepy CGI–all possible humanity is stripped from her for the sake of Rachel’s backstory. And jump scares). Despite Rachel’s fears, her parents leave her alone with Zelda one night and instruct her to feed her sister (Rachel’s parents also qualify as the Parents of the Year). Now, this twist is changed from the source material, where Zelda chokes to death and Rachel is too scared to do anything. In this version, however, Rachel is too scared to even go in her sister’s room, so she sends the food up a dumb waiter that she knows is broken. Zelda ends up falling down the dumb waiter and dying, with Rachel’s last image of her being all twisted and ew and it all being her fault.

So that’s why Rachel is kinda iffy about death. She even argues with Louis when he tries to explain death to Ellie, because she’d rather her kids be protected from it as long as possible. Again, I get that this is the point of Rachel’s character–I do. But she chooses to hide this backstory from Louis up until the plot says she can tell it. It’s this story and how traumatized Rachel is about it that convinces Louis to tell Ellie that Church ran away rather than the truth. Now, if my significant other suddenly spewed out a story like that, I would say “wow, I’m so sorry, and also I think it would benefit everyone if you went to therapy.” Not in a mean way, but just…that clearly broke Rachel as a person, and she never got over it because she was never helped to.

Also she drops her two-year-old son out a window to her husband who brought their dead daughter back to life so, again, PARENTS OF THE YEAR, FOLKS.

Rachel and Louis are so frustrating as a couple because they never deal with anything, ever. Rather than seek help for his grief and maybe chat with his new neighbor friend who also seems to have experienced tragedy, Louis drugs Jud and goes out into the woods to resurrect his daughter rather than deal with her death in a healthy way. Even though his daughter just died, he stays behind because of “work stuff” while his wife and their ALIVE AND WELL TWO-YEAR-OLD SON leave. And when said two-year-old son, Gage, starts having nightmares and talking about the dead university kid Louis talked about earlier, instead of, again, maybe seeking out help and like a child psychiatrist, Rachel says “clearly we both need to go back to the awful house where Gage almost died and Ellie definitely did, nothing can go wrong I bet.”

We’re not even gonna go into how Louis locks Gage in a car and tells him to “not open the door for anyone, even Ellie.” THAT KID IS TWO YEARS OLD, LOUIS. WHAT ARE YOU DOING.

And THEN, Louis has a perfectly good chance to take Gage and leave. He knows now that Ellie is beyond saving, his wife is now dead, too, but Gage is still alive. He can take Gage and they can GTFO. But no, he just LEAVES THE TWO-YEAR-OLD IN THE CAR BECAUSE HE HAS SOME HERO COMPLEX AND DECIDES SURELY I CAN TAKE ON MY ZOMBIE DAUGHTER WHO HAS BEEN SHOWN TO HAVE A CRAZY UNNATURAL AMOUNT OF STRENGTH AND A WHOLE LOT OF BLOODLUST.

Jud kind of teeters back and forth between likable and not, but as we all know, it’s also his fault this all happened, too. Since he was the one to first show the haunted, evil graveyard to Louis and have him bury the cat there, he is very much responsible (although, Louis, again, is the worst in this moment: they pick out a perfectly fine area in the actual Pet Sematary, and suddenly Jud is all weird and asking him creepy questions and guiding him through a swamp that has an unnatural amount of fog and telling him “you have to do this yourself, I can’t help you?” Like…Louis. My man. That is when you get the hell outta dodge, friend). Now, Jud is very much a victim in this story: somehow the evil graveyard spirit possesses him and he regrets it very much. Maybe he truly believed Church would come back different, that Ellie may come back different. But the point is, he still did a stupid thing and everyone else suffered for it.

Also–why is it that Zombie Ellie made a point of resurrecting both Louis and Rachel, but left Jud there to rot? If you want a zombie army, don’t you want all the people you can get? What’s that? It’s because the plot says so?

…fine.

Ellie is the only character I would consider likable (Gage is two, and therefore his only personality traits consist of “toddler” and “has the Shining but it’s pointless because he dies anyway,” so. Also he is the son of the Parents of the Year), which of course means she dies. Ellie, as a nine-year-old, has a morbid fascination with the Pet Sematary and with the subject of death in general. She’s confronted with it when she wanders into the cemetery, and while Jud is happy to explain the history and discuss the stories behind each of the personalized grave markers, Ellie has to be dragged away by her mom who refuses to confront death because NO ONE HELPED HER THROUGH HER TRAUMA, so now she won’t help her daughter through hers.

I do think that Ellie’s curiosity about death plays really well into her zombie self–she says things like “I’m dead, aren’t I?” In such a calm way. Then, however, she gets all murderous and stereotypically evil, so we can’t even have a sympathetic villain because PLOT, I GUESS.

Then of course, there’s Church. I do think the scene where Church watches Ellie killing Jud while purring is extra funny only because I have a cat, and we constantly joke that she’s actually extremely evil and responsible for anything bad that happens. We love her to death (HA, JOKES!) but she’s definitely evil.

Even the ghost guy who’s supposed to serve as some kind of warning I guess is really confusing, because even though he “warns” Louis that the “barrier mustn’t be broken,” he also appears to Gage and that is what sends Rachel and Gage back to Ludlow and therefore, back to their deaths. I just…worst warning omen ever, basically.

Also, wow you killed off the only person of color in the film and had them serve as the supernatural helper, what a new trope that’s never been used before…ever…

THE SEMATARY

Okay first of all, this overhead shot of the sign while Ellie walks inside wasn’t actually in the film itself, and it’s my favorite shot in the trailers. It’s super unsettling and really well-done, and it’s NOT EVEN IN THE MOVIE.

Anyway.

I have to discuss the actual plot device that serves as the namesake of the story: the Pet Sematary. I think my favorite scene of the film is when Ellie discovers it and then walks around it with Jud.

You can tell the set designer and set dressers had a blast with this particular set, and it sucks we only really got to appreciate it for one minor scene. Every grave marker is so personalized, you can tell they thought of the story behind both the pet and the child behind the marker’s design in detail. While it’s certainly eerie (it is a cemetery after all), it’s also incredibly sad.

I mean, the kids of the town created this place specifically because of that stupid road and how many pets it constantly cost them (BUILD SOME FENCES, GUYS, PLEASE).

There’s an air of mystery around the area, and why I think you could very easily do a whole series of short stories just focusing on each grave marker–who was the pet? Who was the child? Did any of them have to be killed more than once because they re-buried them in the cursed land behind the Pet Sematary, like Jud did?

The idea behind the Pet Sematary is my favorite story element, and it’s a shame it doesn’t actually play as a big a part in the film as you might believe.

Also–Jud explains that the Pet Sematary is part of the land that the Creed family now owns…so like, if it’s always been a part of that land, why is it still there? The townspeople apparently didn’t build it on public ground for some reason, so like…why? Unless the original owner was cool with it. But then that means whoever buys the house and the land has the right to just get rid of it and build a park or something (which will still be building something on cursed ground, so like…still not great, but nobody knows that except Jud, right?)

Ooh, I have an idea for Pet Sematary 2

THE WENDIGO

Alright kids, let’s talk about supernatural creatures/cryptids, shall we?

Because the movie only hints at the backstory and the existence of the Wendigo, it’s apparently supposed to be the evil entity in the woods that controls everything. But again, the movie doesn’t really explain…any of it.

So I tried to do some research on my own, because by the end of the film, the Wendigo was the only thing I was really fascinated by as I was trying to block everything else from my brain to save my sanity.

The Wendigo is a creature from Algonquin myth, and while some stories would have you believe that the creature was originally a hunter/explorer who became lost and then so starving and desperate he resorted to cannibalism, the actual point of the myth is believed to be a story that warns people against greed. The idea is that no matter how much (people) the Wendigo eats, he is never satisfied, so be content with what you have and don’t wish for more because it won’t end well–or, more specifically, craving things you don’t actually need will never satisfy you and only leave you hungry for more.

While it became clear to me how this myth tied into the tale (and quite nicely, too!), this connection is never explored in the actual story, and I think that’s a shame. I read an article about how Western audiences seem to be fascinated by the Wendigo, but for all the wrong reasons: the Wendigo is supposed to be a tragic, yet scary figure. He’s alone and always craving more and more, and is never satisfied. He’s a warning to not be like him, and yet Western stories that feature him tend to up the scare factor over the tragic factor, which…I mean leave it to white people, right? #whyarewelikethis

So just for fun and because I’m a nerd, let’s compare how the legend of the Wendigo has been used in various forms of Western media. And remember, the whole idea behind the Wendigo is that it’s supposed to be a warning against greed–not a horror movie creature.

Let’s start with the one that first introduced me to the Wendigo: an episode of Supernatural.

Supernatural, back when I still really liked it, had a really great “monster-of-the-week” formula, and for its second episode ever, it focused on the Wendigo. In the show, the Wendigo’s backstory is simple: it was a human, it resorted to cannibalism, and now it stalks the woods hunting for campers every 23 years (the 23 years bit is never explained, it just makes it more ~spooky~). Sam and Dean, our two brothers, help out a group of campers looking for some friends that recently went missing in the woods. Sam and Dean consult their father’s journal, back when that mattered (I’m not bitter, I swear), and discover that based off the evidence, the creature they’re now hunting must be a Wendigo. Another trait wendigos are said to possess is the ability to mimic human cries, and this is one way they lure their “prey.” (Maybe the creature in BirdBox is a form of Wendigo…?)

Anyway, wendigos can only be killed with fire, so they end up killing the beast with flare guns (all I can think of is how useless the flare gun was in Us…). Because it’s just the way the show was, the Wendigo was the monster of the week, and was only featured to be spooky, kill some characters, and then die. Now, there are some monsters on Supernatural that have a really sad backstory that the brothers have to get into, but the Wendigo doesn’t get that. He’s simply someone who resorted to cannibalism, and now is a monster.

So does the idea of the Wendigo being about greed tie in here? Not really. Again, the wendigo’s purpose is to be scary and spooky and then die. That’s it.

Now, let’s move to a more recent example: the video game Until Dawn.

Until Dawn is, I think, one of my favorite games (says the person who hasn’t actually played it, but because it’s so story-focused, watching someone else play it is super fun). It does such a great job of setting up a typical “oooh a bunch of idiot teenagers spend a weekend in a spooky house and there’s a masked killer!” Before taking that typical plot, flipping it on its head, and throwing wendigos at us instead! (Also, it has both Hayden Panettiere and my dear son Rami Malek in it, so…yeah)

While the wendigos represent something a little more tragic in Until Dawn than in Supernatural, it’s still not really the tragic point that it should be. The idea is that wendigos have roamed the mountains at this particular ski lodge that Josh’s family owns, I guess, for quite a while. And because it’s a horror game, the backstory given is a creepy abandoned hospital where Experiments Went Horribly, Horribly Wrong. So the wendigos have always been there, but how do they tie into the story of our teenage protagonists?

The year before the main story takes place, a real awful prank was played on one of Josh’s sisters, Hannah. She runs off into the woods crying, and the only one who will go after her is their other sister, Beth. No matter what you choose, Hannah and Beth end up falling off a cliff, presumably to their deaths. That’s why Josh wants everyone back at the lodge that next year: to celebrate his sisters’ lives, presumably.

Except Hannah didn’t immediately die. Beth was dead instantly, and Hannah buried her, but Hannah was trapped and got to the point where she was so incredibly desperate and hungry that she dug up her sister’s body and ate her to survive. This turns Hannah into a Wendigo.

Later in the game, depending on what you choose, Josh is also turned into a Wendigo (I think he gets turned by his own sister, too).

Okay, so that’s really sad, definitely…but does it have anything to do with greed?

Not really. I mean each character has something wrong with them, sure, but none of the characters who turn into wendigos suffered from greed, necessarily. Josh just wanted his “friends” to suffer for causing his sisters to die. Hannah just wanted to be alone after being humiliated by people she trusted (and by the guy she liked).

It’s super sad and really well done, but again, the wendigos are presented as Scary Creatures to be killed because they’re a threat, and that’s about it.

Now, while the Wendigo in Pet Sematary certainly makes sense (Louis was so greedy when it came to wanting to have more time with his family, he ended up killing all of them and now they’re all stuck being zombie family together forever), the connection isn’t explained in context of the film and that’s frustrating and, in my opinion, a huge missed opportunity. It’s presented as a family horror drama with a light sprinkling of supernatural that’s never actually explained, and I think if you’re gonna bother throwing a Wendigo reference in, you should bother explaining it and expanding on it. Again, maybe in Pet Sematary 2

So is there a Western piece of media that uses the Wendigo in a more proper way, tying into the original legend a bit more?

Team, let’s talk about Hannibal.

Hannibal is one of my favorite shows from recent years, even though I would absolutely have to take a break in between episodes to let my brain calm down. It’s beautifully shot, beautifully acted, and incredibly fascinating. It’s also incredibly dark, and therefore, not for everyone. But just like Us, there are an infinite number of theories about Hannibal because so much of it is symbolic.

On the surface level, it makes sense to have Wendigo symbolism in a show about the most famous fictional cannibal…ever, but the show gives us so much more than that. There’s so much to infer when the Wendigo comes onscreen (besides the fact that the Wendigo is revealed to be, of course, Hannibal himself). All of the characters in Hannibal are both incredibly likable and incredibly unlikable all at once. Hannibal himself is classy, lonely, put-together but also incredibly evil–his quiet demeanor makes him all the more frightening when we see him kill. Will Graham is just a mess, but he’s also lonely, confused, and brilliant. Both Hannibal and Will are greedy for what they find in each other. Hannibal thinks Will is fascinating, incredibly talented, and incredibly broken. He finds a mirror in Will that he didn’t think was possible. Likewise, Will finds a human in Hannibal he didn’t expect to since he’s actually the killer he’s been hunting this whole time. But they’re also greedy in what they do in everyday life. Hannibal is greedy for recognition and, of course, for killing (and eating). Will is greedy for recognition, too, but in a way that gets him respect so people stop thinking he’s crazy. It’s a beautiful character study of a story, and the Wendigo serves as an important symbol that isn’t shied away from or used for cheap scares.

I’m sure there are more, but these are the examples I’ve personally come across. My point is, the legend behind the Wendigo and the tragedy, the warning about greed, is a fascinating story point that I think could tie into horror stories really, really well, and it just…doesn’t. The Wendigo is used for The Scares, or to be a background character so we can focus more on the idiotic humans (they’re just…THEY LEAVE A TWO-YEAR-OLD IN A CAR).

Which brings us to…

THE STORY I WISHED WE’D GOTTEN

Imagine for me, if you will, a story where the Wendigo plays a bigger role. Instead of being reduced to background lore and a minor appearance in the shadows, he’s the Big Baddie…or is he?

I use this photo here because I guess, originally, the kids in the creepy animal masks were supposed to play a bigger role. They were supposed to know all about the creepy cursed graveyard, and they were supposed to be somewhat supernatural themselves. Maybe they were supposed to be zombies, too, and that would explain why Ellie wears the cat mask when she goes on her murderous rages.

Imagine a story where Ellie is lost because of tragic circumstance. Where Louis imagines doing the unthinkable, but then remembers his own words to his daughter about how “dying is perfectly natural,” and he can’t bring himself to do it. He goes to Jud’s that night not dead-set (haha, puns) on a decision, but instead broken and in need of comfort. He confesses what he thought about doing, but he says he couldn’t bring himself to because she wouldn’t be the same, right? Jud is able to comfort Louis and apologize for even showing him the graveyard to begin with, and the two find solace in their own grief.

The next day, still hurting but maybe a little better, Louis tells Rachel that there is something out there in the woods, and he feels like he owes it to Jud, to Ellie, to dear, evil Church to figure out what’s really happening. Maybe she’s confused and upset, initially, because why won’t he just be with his family? But then Gage has nightmares, both about ghosts and about the Wendigo. Rachel’s unnerved by this, but she decides that she should definitely be with Louis, and if he’s determined about his, maybe she should be, too.

The third act is changed from a murder spree into a hunt, as Louis, Jud, and Rachel team up with other townspeople to learn about the Wendigo and decide that if the cursed ground is too tempting, maybe there’s some way to get rid of it, and the Wendigo, for good.

But in the final confrontation between Louis and the Wendigo, he sees himself reflected there. Maybe the Wendigo, if it was a person originally, lost his family, too. In a Donner Party-esque twist, maybe the only way to save the rest of his family was to have them all eat the dead member, but once they find out what he did, they’re so torn apart and distraught they can’t cope anymore. Filled with grief but also, now, an insatiable hunger, he eats the rest of his family, too. This is a tragic creature who is never satisfied, and preys on the people who are just like him. He hunts for those who crave more time with the departed, rather than be thankful for the time they had. He encourages people to use the cursed ground because it is how his evil, and his pain, will spread.

Maybe Louis still, ultimately, has to kill the Wendigo. Or maybe Rachel does. Maybe when they do, Church dies all over again, now without an evil spirit fueling him. Maybe the kids with the masks, revealed to yes, have been zombies this whole time, serving the Wendigo, also die, for real this time. Their masks fall away, revealing the human children underneath, finally free from the torment of serving the evil spirit in the woods. Maybe the fog finally leaves the graveyard, the sun rises, and the dead swamp is suddenly filled with the sounds of birds, frogs, insects…life, real life, has returned to the area.

Louis, Rachel, and Gage move away from Ludlow. Jud stays because it’s the only home he’s ever known, and he feels he has a duty to the townspeople there. They reflect on the wendigo’s story, and it’s implied that they’re actually better off now for their experiences, however horrible they may be. They visit Ellie’s grave once more before they leave, and Louis places her stuffed cat toy on her grave. Maybe they buried Church, properly this time, beside her. Maybe as they walk away, Gage sees his sister and her cat standing there, watching them, finally at peace.

Louis is able to confront his grief and how death changes when it’s personal, but that it’s still natural. Rachel is able to confront her fear of death and maybe even overcome it, even in a small way. Jud is able to truly apologize for his actions and save someone, just like he always wanted to. Gage is never left alone in a car. Ellie still dies, which is the whole “realism” Stephen King apparently wanted with this tale, but she doesn’t have to suffer as an innocent and the victim of a freak accident.

I realize, of course, this is all a moot point, as the source material for the story is nothing like this. However, though the movie may share a name, characters, and a good portion of the original story, so much of what was crucial was changed that it’s basically an entirely different story now. So why not go in the positive direction?

Oh, right. Because that’s not “cool,” I guess.

THE ENDING

The ending for Pet Sematary is real dark.

There is no hope anywhere. As much as people want to claim it’s ambiguous because Gage’s death is not shown, it’s not. The beginning shot of the film showed Jud’s house on fire, which we see at the end, and it showed the Creed’s house with the blood trail from Rachel, leading away into the woods, and we see their car, the front door open. Unless some magic individual showed up, fought a bunch of zombies, and took Gage, or Gage suddenly developed superpowers and escaped his family, Gage is dead, too.

Absolutely everyone dies, and the implication is that no one can escape the pull of the evil graveyard. That’s it. Quite literally, life sucks and then you die (and then sometimes your deranged family brings you back to life as an evil zombie).

I don’t know who to blame for this sudden surge in absolutely dark and depressing endings in media, but I think I’ll blame Game of Thrones. Along with, like, maybe The Walking Dead. It may be subversive and interesting when you first see it, but then when every story does it? It’s not interesting or a plot twist, anymore. It’s just damn depressing.

Pet Sematary claims to be a story that focuses on death, how it’s inevitable, and how maybe it’s not the best idea to lie about it or “protect” people from “the truth.” I get that it’s one of those things that isn’t exactly a fun conversation, but it has to happen at some point, right? Pet Sematary is like the ultimate worst-case scenario, where a group of people who were never taught to handle death in a healthy way get power over it, and everything literally goes to hell.

In some ways, it is that.

But it’s also just really, really depressing.

In the alternate version of the story I came up with back there, all of those topics are still handled, but the audience is still given some hope. We see a family go through a terrible, horrible tragedy that we hope will never befall us but, unfortunately, it still might. They go through it and they come out stronger for it. Yeah, it sucks, and of course we’d all prefer that it never happened, but it’s not like it happened in vain. They learned from it, they moved on in a healthy way, and they confronted something that they weren’t good at dealing with at first.

My alternate version can still be plenty scary, of course, but it can also make the viewer think about what they saw and how it applies to them. As it is, Pet Sematary tells the viewer that no matter how much you may prepare for it, death can come when you least expect it, there’s nothing you can do, and if given the chance to have power over it, humans will take it and mess it up, no exceptions.

Which like…well, shit.

Now don’t get me wrong, Us still ended with a lot of bloodshed, and the revelation that the person we were cheering for was lying to us the entire time, and that’s pretty unfortunate. But we still had characters we liked who survived, who looked their supposed fate in the face and said “um, no” and don’t we all hope that we would be like that if faced with the same thing?

We watch and read dystopian stories not for the horrible state the world is in at the beginning, but for how our heroes will rise above it and win in the end. Our own world is so scary right now, why would we ever subject ourselves to the same thing in media?

But maybe that’s just me, because Pet Sematary has a lot of diehard (HAHA, PUNS) fans just the way it is. I may not understand it personally, but it’s all a matter of taste.

I still think, however, that creators need to learn that maybe, just maybe, we want heroes to win. We want to see ourselves in characters onscreen who get a happy ending, because maybe we feel like we’ll never get one in our world.

Apparently, Pet Sematary had three different endings that were shown to test audiences, each one darker than the last. Because the last one seemed to get the biggest reaction from audiences, that was the one they went with.

But I think creators are misinterpreting good writing that gets a reaction vs. unfair writing that gets a reaction. When we watch a tragic ending that actually serves the plot, leaves us all better for it, and is handled with care, they get a big reaction. But when a good character dies for a tragic ending in an unexpected, unfair way that is never explained, never fully dealt with, and all done for the sake of a plot twist, they get a big reaction, too. But it’s because we feel cheated, not because we feel fulfilled.

And maybe creators don’t actually care about that, but I think media creators need to realize that, despite Jud’s warnings, sometimes dead is not better. A big reaction isn’t good if it’s full of anger because something was tastelessly done, or done simply to get people talking about it. There’s a way for these characters to complete their arcs and be handled with care, rather than just be killed off for the sake of some scares and a really dark ending. I don’t know, I think we’ve all had enough of that.

(And yes, this is absolutely also serving as a callout post for the TV show The Magicians, who recently killed off a great character in the most tasteless way possible, all for the sake of a plot twist and “big reactions,” and I’m still real bitter about it)

I mean, at least with Funny Games, the creator out and out said it was as dark as it was to be a direct jab at the media for glorifying violence as entertainment. Pet Sematary is dark and violent just to scare people and just to get a big reaction without a deeper meaning or message explicitly stated. Kinda cheap, when you think about it.

FAVORITE MOMENT

Ughhhhhhh um…this is gonna be really weird, but I actually really like how Ellie’s death scene happens? I like how it’s implied that the evil spirit possessing Church made it so that Ellie would be lured out into the road, like it knew that Ellie’s death would lead to a whole lot more zombies later.

So Ellie gets lured out, but Gage gets lured out, too, and Louis is able to save his son…and not his daughter. It’s actually a lot more tragic this way, I think, and a lot more “realism” I guess, if that’s what you want. The sound also cuts out when the gas tank flies off the truck, so it’s completely silent and slow-motion as Louis stumbles over to the road, sees Rachel falling to her knees to crawl away and sob…and it’s silent as he cradles his daughter’s body.

It’s surprisingly emotional, and absolutely meaningless later because remember kids, you can bring anyone back as a zombie, so sadness doesn’t really mater. Yay!

Also, this doesn’t count as a moment, but I loved learning about all the cats that played Church and how they had specific makeup artists and such. I love it.

“OOF” MOMENT

Listen, I know the haunted evil burial ground is supposed to be all spooky and mystical, but ohhhhhh man when it was first introduced, it was sooooo over the top with its fog machine effects, thunderstorm effects, lightning everywhere…I mean, I felt like we should be in Dracula’s lair or something.

It just wasn’t that scary, just ridiculously over-the-top and kinda goofy.

But it’s okay, we got plenty of jump scares featuring Rachel’s dead sister to make up for it! Yayyyyyyy!!!

SHOULD YOU TAKE YOURSELF TO SEE THIS MOVIE?

Look, if you’re a big horror movie fan, I’m sure you’ll like it. I guess. I don’t know, I’m clearly not a great judge of horror movies. But I know generally the reception has been good, despite my own personal feelings about it.

One review I watched said he didn’t think it was gruesome or scary enough, so…I guess do with that what you will, I had a horrible time sleeping the night I saw it, but go off, I guess.

I guess what I’m saying is that if horror movies aren’t usually your thing, Pet Sematary will definitely not be your thing at all. There is nothing in it worth seeing outside of it being a horror film–every detail of it only serves to be scary, nothing more.

I guess the little girl is good at acting creepy, but it’s not such a phenomenal job that I’ll insist you see it for that.

For me, though there were some things I liked (the music! The potential! The cats!), it wasn’t enough to have me say I enjoyed the film as a whole, because I really didn’t. I just sat there wishing it was something it was never intended to be–it’s a scary story, and it’s not meant to be anything more.

So if you like that kind of thing, sure. Go see it.

If you don’t, you can skip this one.

As for me, I give Pet Sematary

1.5/5 GRAVESTONES OF THINGS LOST BECAUSE OF THIS MOVIE!!

I mean no offense if you liked it, I just…why?

TRAILERS TO WATCH OUT FOR

Nothing groundbreaking, especially since it was mostly horror films. At least now I can say I saw a typical horror film, I gave it a chance,…and I hated it. Yay!

Anyway, new trailers include: Midsommar, which is from the same person who directed Hereditary (if you missed that one like I did, it’s pretty much just as dark and hopeless as Pet Sematary, though I know people were absolutely raving about it. Again, go off, I guess). It looks insanely creepy and weird, so uh…yeah probably not.

Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark is such a nostalgic thing for me…I remember countless sleepovers where, if we were allowed, we’d read the books and then, of course, never sleep. The movie looks absolutely horrifying, and honestly? Good. It’s like it took stories that were scary for the kids who read them, and then realized those kids are now adults, so now we have to make it just as scary as it was then. Will I be seeing it? Honestly yeah, probably. Will I regret it? Honestly yeah, probably. The pull of nostalgia, like the cursed burial ground, is strong. My own personal Wendigo!

Annabelle Comes Home IS A BIG, BIG NO. NOPE. MM-MM. NUH-UH. If you come across a creepy doll in a box that says “do not open under any circumstances” THEN YOU DON’T OPEN IT!!! YOU LEAVE!!!! YOU GTFO!!!!!! WHY ARE PEOPLE LIKE THIS!!!!!!!!

Anyway, if Pet Sematary seems like something you’d like, then absolutely go for it. But if you were on the fence about it for whatever reason, I don’t think you need to see it for any reason.

But maybe like listen to the soundtrack, because that’s good.

Otherwise…don’t go exhuming people and re-burying them in cursed burial grounds. Just. Don’t do it.

No.

Us REVIEW

IT’S FINALLY HERE AND IT’S GREAT.

So by now, I’ve actually seen Us three times (one of which was with my good bro Jack, whom I told I would give a shoutout–so if you’re reading, hello! Aren’t you so glad we saw this movie LATE AT NIGHT??? Nah, he loves being my friend–I come with discount popcorn, after all). Jordan Peele’s highly anticipated follow-up to Get Out was well worth the hype, at least in my opinion.

Did it absolutely terrify me and fill me with regret since I was housesitting for a week alone after seeing it? You BETCHA.

To be fair, though, I thought by the third time it wouldn’t scare me as much. I know what’s gonna happen, right? I KNOW IT’S A MOVIE, RIGHT?

See, this is the fun thing about Jordan Peele movies: you discover something new every time you watch it.

I mean it’s fun until you’re alone in a big, dark house, just waiting to see a red jumpsuit-clad, scissor-wielding individual waiting for you upon glancing outside. That’s the worst.

But anyway, let’s get into specifics and splice apart the details of this film because there are a LOT of them.

THE PLOT

We begin with the ominous sound of waves crashing accompanied by text that describes the miles and miles of abandoned tunnels that snake underneath the entirety of the United States (if you’d been theorizing and obsessively combing the trailers for details like I had, your first reaction to this might be “NO ONE SAID ANYTHING ABOUT CREEPY ABANDONED TUNNELS” and I think it’s a brilliant way to start out the film–you don’t know how it relates to anything yet, especially any of the footage you’ve seen, so it’s constantly in the back of your mind as you watch). According to the text onscreen, many of these tunnels have “no known purpose at all.”

So that’s comforting.

We then cut to a young girl (Madison Curry) watching TV in 1986. We see the ending of a news clip, followed by a rather unsettling commercial for Hands Across America. The TV then cuts to an ad for the Santa Cruz boardwalk, and suddenly, we’re right there! The young girl, Adelaide, is there with her parents celebrating her birthday. It’s established that her parents have a somewhat strained relationship, and it all comes to a head when the mom (Anna Diop) asks the dad (Yahya Abdul Mateen II) to watch his daughter, please, while she goes to the bathroom. The dad agrees, but he’s a little preoccupied with Whack-a-Mole at the moment. Adelaide wanders off to the shore, where a storm is both literally and figuratively brewing. She turns and sees the “Shaman’s Vision Quest” (a mirror maze, essentially) with the tagline “Find Yourself.”

Drawn inside just as the rain begins, she and her reflections wander around until suddenly, the power cuts out (because of COURSE IT DOES). Frightened, she hunts for the exit and begins whistling “The Itsy Bitsy Spider” to calm her nerves. It’s all well and good until she hears someone else whistling, too. It’s not quite the same tune, and it doesn’t sound as sharp as her own whistling. She then bumps into what appears to be another reflection of herself, except it doesn’t turn around at the same time she does…

Flash forward to present day, where an older Adelaide (Lupita Nyong’o) is heading on vacation with her husband Gabe (Duke Wilson) and their two kids, Zora (Shahadi Wright Joseph) and Jason (Evan Alex). They seem to be your typical goofy family, on vacation at their summer home. Gabe wants to go meet their family friends at the beach, but Adelaide is reluctant because, well, it’s the Santa Cruz boardwalk. She gives in after Gabe adorably guilt-trips her about it, and on the way, they pass by an ambulance loading someone inside who looks…a little worse for wear, to say the least.

Later at the beach, Jason wanders off, passing by the mirror maze from Adelaide’s childhood, now rebranded as the “Merlin’s Forest” with the same tagline as before. He bypasses it, however, noticing instead a strange figure standing on the beach–a man wearing a red jumpsuit, a tattered green coat, and some blood dripping from his fingers. Adelaide, noticing Jason’s absence and fearing the worst, goes into a panic calling for him.

Later that night back at the house, Adelaide opens up to Gabe about her childhood trauma involving the mirror maze, but Gabe doesn’t really know what to do with the story. Then, of course, the power goes out. Jason appears in the doorway, saying “there’s a family in our driveway” (THAT LINE IS ICONIC AND SO, SO FREAKY).

Turns out, there is a family in the driveway, standing altogether in red jumpsuits and holding hands. Gabe attempts to talk with them and ask them to leave, but Adelaide’s immediate response is to call the cops (who are 14 minutes away, because OF COURSE THEY ARE). Soon though, the other family invades the home and are in control of Adelaide’s family in no time.

They are, as Jason points out, “us.” But what do they want, and why are they here?

The rest of the movie is an impressive game of cat-and-mouse as the Wilson family defend themselves from their malicious doppelgängers, try to figure out what is going on, and why it’s all happening to begin with.

Oh also? There’s a devious plot twist at the end.

Because of COURSE THERE IS.

THE REVIEW

Listen. LISTEN.

Us is a phenomenal feat of storytelling. It just is.

It’s baffling to me that all the people I saw it with, ALL THREE TIMES, didn’t seem to feel the same way.

I get where everyone’s coming from, of course. Get Out is an amazing, must-see film. It’s impressive in every sense of the word, and in some ways, its success hurt Jordan Peele for any follow-up films he creates. Because Get Out was such a strong debut, every film he makes from here on in is going to be compared to it, and that’s just the way it is.

I think that’s why so many people’s support for Us fizzled out once they saw it. What can you do but expect another Get Out, and Us just…isn’t that at all.

I’ve been thinking it, but Matpat’s Film Theory channel on YouTube said it: Us is a great film, and while it’s just as symbolic and noteworthy as Get Out, it’s different–and that’s hard to swallow on a first viewing. When you see Get Out for the first time, you truly do not know what to expect. When you see Us the first time, you can’t help thinking about and expecting another Get Out.

But Us is very much its own thing, and in a really good way.

I get it’s not everyone’s thing. I’m not a horror aficionado in any way (despite my being drawn to the stories of the genre because of my Enneagram four-ness) and I sacrificed my sanity for this film THREE TIMES because I loved and appreciated all the thought and heart that went into Get Out, and I hoped that Us would be the same in that respect. AND IT IS.

I think the other thing that makes me love it so strongly is that it’s original, dammit. It’s not a sequel, it’s not a remake, it’s not a live-action version of something that used to be animated, it’s not based on a true story (…that we know of), and it’s not inspired by a book or some other source material of the like. It’s new, it’s fresh, it’s scary because it’s not based off of any lore that we can think of, you don’t know what’s going to happen going into it because it’s something we haven’t seen before. I imagine this is how people felt going into Friday the 13th the first time, or The Blair Witch Project. I think it’s why Crypt TV is so popular (and HORRIFYING, GOOD LORD). It seems like everything coming out of Hollywood is “based on,” or “inspired by,” or a “part two” (or three…or FOUR (looking at you, Pixar)).

Us is all its own, and it’s so, so nice. It was exhilarating when the lights finally dimmed and the logos began–all those months of waiting and theorizing finally coming to a head.

It does feel a little like the movie drops you off a cliff in the middle of nowhere with the twist, and I get that. It feels unfair, to some degree, because the movie doesn’t hold your hand and give a cut and dry explanation for everything like Get Out did. It’s disorienting. It’s frustrating.

And it means you have to see it again. Everything is different the second time around. Hell, it’s different the third time around (for my own sake and my sanity, I refuse Round 4 until it’s out to buy and I can convince other people to see it in a well-lit room during the day). It has you replaying every little moment, every bit of dialogue, every visual detail, searching for the clues you didn’t think to watch for the first time around.

I live for movies like this. It’s not just a good time out, a quick escape from real life, and then that’s it, back to the grind. You don’t get to turn your brain off for a couple hours because you need it to figure out what on EARTH is going on. Then you get to be full of regret afterwards when your brain betrays you at home and goes “hey what if your Tethered is right outside right now that would be crazy right hahahahaha”

But let’s get into specifics because, again, there is a LOT to go through and I’m sure I’ll miss only about a million things.

MAJOR spoiler warning from here on in!!! Trust me, you don’t want to have this spoiled for you before you get a chance to see this movie. Seriously. I actually promise it’s not as scary as the trailers made it seem. I mean it’s scary, but not horrifying. I haven’t seen Pet Sematary, but I’m assuming it’s not that. Or The Curse of La Llorona. You know what I mean–it doesn’t throw a million jump scares at you all at once. There are some, but it’s not the whole film.

ANYWAY. SPOILERS. YOU GET IT.

THE MUSIC

So I already discussed the soundtrack at length before the movie was out, and you can check that out here. It’s kind of funny looking back at that after having seen the movie, because I was only MOSTLY wrong about things!

The music is incredible. It’s so unsettling and nerve-wracking and always serves the film in a positive light. Again, I’ve discussed my favorite tracks already, but both “Run” and “Pas de deux” are still amazing to me and it was so fun when they started playing during the movie because I got to be like “HEY!!! HEYYYYY!! I KNOW THIS! :D”

There is one scene I absolutely have to cover when it comes to the music: the final fight between Adelaide and her Tethered, Red. The whole sequence is this crazy back and forth between Adelaide and Red battling it out in the present with flashes of the two of them performing ballet when they were teenagers, and the whole thing is underscored by, you guessed it, “Pas de deux.” It’s truly a cinematic feat, and it’s amazing to experience every time you watch the film.

By that scene, we’ve heard the iconic “I Got 5 On It” a couple times, so when the violins strike up the theme, it’s already familiar even if you didn’t know the song prior to watching the movie. However, it’s distorted–something familiar changed into something almost unrecognizable, not unlike the Tethered counterparts of the characters we met through the story.

Again. I could go on and on about the music forever, basically. We know this. It’s great. I love it. THERE’S MORE TO COVER.

THE CHARACTERS

As much as I love cinematic music, the thing that often really makes or breaks a film for me is the characters. If I don’t relate to them or even like them in any way, I’m just not going to get invested in the film at all *cough*ALITABATTLEANGEL*cough*.

So again, yet another reason I love Jordan Peele’s work is because he creates such dynamic, lovable characters. You love and support the Wilson family and are cheering for them the whole time, HOPING one of them doesn’t die. And this is a horror movie! Isn’t that normally the goal, ticking off how many deaths there are?? I mean it’s scary when Gabe gets dragged out of the house and off-screen by Abraham for a number of reasons, partly because it’s just hard to watch, but also because we can no longer see him. We don’t know what’s happening to him, and that’s absolutely horrifying because he’s such a great character!

I think it’s why the ending twist felt like such a betrayal for people–you cheer for Adelaide and love her and want her to win this whole time…only to find out that SHE’S BEEN THE TETHERED VERSION THIS WHOLE TIME?? We just watched her kill the REAL ADELAIDE??? It’s uncomfortable because we genuinely don’t know how to handle this information.

I’ll go into how this ties into one of the possible messages of the film later…but I think it’s one of my favorite things about the film (one of…well, many).

Adelaide and Gabe clearly have a good relationship, and that’s refreshing to see. They tease each other, they laugh with each other, they can talk to each other, they just give off the appearance of such a good team (even when things start going off the rails a bit). They love their kids, and so do we. Zora could easily have been the typical “teenage girl who complains about everything like Wi-Fi and is only ever on her phone” but at her core, she’s more than that. She isn’t afraid to take charge and when Jason gets his magic trick right, she fist bumps him even though she poked fun of home for it earlier on. Jason himself is a little odd, everyone can see that, but it’s nice that when the twin girls complain about him to Zora, she just says that he has a hard time. Every family member supports all the others, and it’s why they’re such good characters to be with the whole film.

In contrast, the Tethered counterparts are eerie. They look like this family we’ve grown to know and love, but they don’t act like them at all. It’s hard to tell if Red feels anything for her so-called family besides indifference. She clearly resents them as much as she resents Adelaide; she describes being forced to marry Abraham though she didn’t love him, how Umbrae is a monster compared to the beautiful Zora, and how she had to cut Pluto out of her stomach herself while Adelaide had a c-section with Jason. As much as the Tethered are bound together by shared experience, they don’t feel the same familial connections that their counterparts do.

All of that builds up to another fascinating character trait of Adelaide’s: her mothering. She is an incredible mother to Jason and Zora, and it shows through the film. But she also mothers Umbrae and Pluto. When she comes across Umbrae’s twisted form in the woods after Zora knocks her off the road, it’s clear she isn’t going to survive. Despite that, Umbrae keeps reaching out for Adelaide like she might still try to hurt her, all while making these uncomfortable noises as she dies. Adelaide, watching this, stays with her and gently says “shh, shh…” Likewise, she tries to talk Pluto down from his goal of setting the new family car on fire since her family was still inside it and all. When Jason gets Pluto to walk back into his own flames, Adelaide cries for him. It’s interesting to watch, and it does mean, of course, that Red takes Adelaide’s son while she’s busy mourning for Red’s.

The Tyler family make up the other characters we spend time with, and they’re…well…they’re set up as being even more well-off than the Wilson’s, and boy do they show it. They have a better boat, a better car, a better house with a backup generator, Kitty got plastic surgery done to try and stay young, their obnoxious daughters do cartwheels everywhere (most realistic part of the movie right there)…

They’re great foils for the Wilson’s, and it’s so interesting to compare the two home invasion scenes. Gabe may not believe or understand Adelaide’s paranoia at first, but when he notices that something definitely IS off, he is on-board with calling the cops and locking things down, no question. In contrast, Josh doesn’t believe Kitty when she says something is outside, and he makes fun of her for it. They get offed incredibly quickly because they’re so accustomed to their cozy lifestyle where everything is fine…plus, let’s be real, as a well-off white family, they don’t have to be on edge about anything, really.

We don’t get much development for the Jeremiah 11:11 homeless guy (more on him later), but one moment I think is fascinating is at the end when he’s a part of the human chain that Adelaide sees, the camera captures him staring up at the sun and smiling.

The Tethered aren’t monsters, they just genuinely don’t know any better.

THE ART

*deep inhale*

It’s GREAT.

Okay but like really, though. My third time around, I spent a lot more time taking the movie in visually, focusing on the costumes and the like (the second time I was busy focusing on Adelaide’s dialogue because it’s entirely different once you know, and the first time I was busy screaming).

The film in general has a very red color palette (which makes sense, representing both the Tethered’s outfits of choice and all the…blood). The first scene on the boardwalk with young Adelaide has a lot of warm, bold colors, which makes the contrasting cool blues in the mirror maze once the power shuts off kind of startling. Then, all the scenes at the beach house and at the beach before the Tethered’s entrance are very creamy and gold-colored. That all changes, of course, once the Tethered arrive. Red is everywhere, both the color and the character!

People have already touched on the fact that Adelaide wears all white in the beginning, and then her outfit gets more and more red as the film goes on because of, well, blood. Initially, I thought that was supposed to be all symbolic of her becoming more and more of a monster like her Tethered, but that was before I knew about ~the twist~.

But Adelaide wearing all white at the start that gradually becomes more red is actually a fascinating detail for a number of reasons. When I took Costume Design in college, we learned all about color theory, or the idea that certain colors have a specific effect on the human brain and, therefore, human emotions. It’s why heroes are often clad in blue and villains in red–not only are they contrasting colors, but they also represent entirely different things emotionally. Blue has a calming effect on the brain, which is why doctor’s offices will often have blue walls or posters of the sky with clouds or something. Blue is trustworthy, like heroes should be. Red, on the other hand, is angry–we can’t help but think of blood when we see red, and since blood should generally remain inside our bodies, when we see it outside, it’s a little jarring and we just don’t like it. That’s just scratching the surface, of course, and each color can represent a myriad of things. Red can also represent passion and general heightened emotion, just as blue can also represent sadness and heartache. The effect a certain color has on the brain all depends on what other effects are taken in in combination with it.

The color white, generally, represents purity. We all know that Adelaide’s outfit through most of the film is white, but my third time watching it, I noticed that all of her outfits are white. She wears a white dress, she wears a white hat…”but isn’t her swimsuit yellow?” I hear you say.

Remember how I said the color palette in the beginning was all creamy and gold?

Adelaide fits into her surroundings visually, and not only that, all her outfits are white and flowy. She looks almost angelic in the beginning, so subconsciously, we trust her. Dressing her in white gives her the appearance of being pure, so not only do we subconsciously trust her, we also want to protect her. We want her to win and survive.

It’s kind of a cruel joke on the part of the costume design–the creators know that Adelaide isn’t actually Adelaide, but the audience doesn’t. By getting us to subconsciously trust her because of how she’s dressed, we fall all the harder when the twist is revealed.

Her outfit gradually becoming more and more red throughout the film serves as both proof of the final twist, and as a metaphor for what she did. When she took Adelaide/Red’s place in the beginning of the film and chained her to the bed in the tunnels, she unknowingly started the Tethered revolution that would come back to haunt her years later. It’s her own fault the red of the Tethered gradually takes over her pure, perfect world above ground. She started this.

Also, yeah, it serves as a visual reminder the second time you watch the movie that Adelaide isn’t who we believe her to be.

Also-did you catch how the first rabbit we see in the opening credits and the rabbit Jason is holding at the end are both white with red eyes?

THE VILLAIN

So who IS the villain in Us?

It’s…us.

Or is it them?

I DON’T KNOW ANYMORE.

Like I mentioned earlier, a lot of people felt betrayed by the final twist in Us because it was essentially revealed that the whole time when we thought we were cheering for the hero, WE WERE ACTUALLY CHEERING FOR THE VILLAIN.

Or were we?

This is one of the most fascinating dilemmas of the movie, and another thing that separates it so vehemently from Get Out. Whereas Get Out had a very, very clear set of villains, Us doesn’t have that. It tries to draw you in to this whole “us vs. them” dynamic, and the first time watching the film, you probably buy it. The Tethered are the villains. They are twisted, almost inhuman versions of our protagonists, therefore they’re easy to hate. They don’t talk or interact with each other the way our heroes do; Red is the only one who can speak, but her voice is so raspy and choked that it’s unsettling. There’s a scene where Abraham and Gabe are on the boat, and Abraham calls out to another Tethered on the shore. They have a quick back and forth that is all done with shouting and yelling, and no specific words are used. It’s almost animalistic the way they communicate with each other, and it makes it that much easier for us to cheer for Gabe’s victory. After all, we like and relate to Gabe! He makes terrible dad jokes!!

Then, out of nowhere (at least for ME, apparently everyone else I saw the movie with guessed the twist early, which WHATEVER), we’re told that the person we’ve been cheering for is one of them, and the person she left down in the tunnels is actually the real Adelaide-one of us (“one of us, ONE OF US”). It just doesn’t feel fair!! The villains won after all!

Did they though?

I mean, yes, we see a shot of the Tethered’s human chain at the end and it’s absolutely terrifying (and apparently much more successful than the real Hands Across America campaign, but more on that later!), and it does seem that “fake Adelaide” is driving her “family” off into oblivion. Oh also? Jason knows the truth, now, so who knows where that’s gonna go.

But here’s the thing: “fake” Adelaide is still really great. We can’t ignore the fact that she’s an incredible wife and mother, as well as a dedicated fighter. She became so human during her time above ground that she had everyone, including the audience, fooled. Maybe she was born into the world of the Tethered, but she learned how to develop relationships and care for others and herself once she left that world behind. By claiming that we were actually cheering for the villain the whole time, we’re completely defining Adelaide by where she comes from, and that is something we seriously need to stop doing as human beings.

But okay, if Adelaide isn’t the villain, Red and the other Tethered are clearly the villains right?

Ehhhhhhhhhhhh…

When you think about it, Red’s whole story is actually incredibly tragic. She was born into a life of privilege above ground, but because she wandered off one night, she’s trapped below surrounded by people she doesn’t know who can’t even talk and have to eat raw rabbit to sustain themselves. She’s still connected to Adelaide, so when Adelaide takes up ballet, so too does she. I think it’s this combination of her dancing and the fact that she can talk (sort of, the speculation is that her voice sounds the way it does because when Adelaide choked her in the mirror maze, she crushed her vocal chords, and they never recovered) that shows the Tethered that she’s different. Maybe she can save them. They didn’t even know that there might be something better out there, but Red’s clearly smart, seeing as how she organized the whole revolution thing. She’d be able to figure out everything about the cloning experiment from what was left behind, and since all she knew of Hands Across America was her shirt and that ad she saw, she’d use that to make her statement for her new people. She wants them to take the place of their counterparts because that’s what happened to her. She wants them to make a statement because she never got to. She wants them to have their time in the sun because she can just barely remember what it was like, and she misses it. She’s so close to being successful, but Adelaide is smart, too. When she’s dying in Adelaide’s arms, she starts to whistle “The Itsy Bitsy Spider” again, because that was what first connected them to begin with.

And Adelaide chokes her again, this time for good.

She was the leader of a rather successful revolution that she never fully got to enjoy because she was so caught up in taking personal revenge, and shouldn’t she have been? Her entire life was stolen from her, and she had to grow up with these people who looked like her parents but were just so off somehow, and she’d never hear them say that they loved her ever again.

The Tethered kill a lot of people in the film, that’s true.

But they don’t know any better. Like Red explains, the entire cloning project was scrapped because they were “able to duplicate the human body, but not the soul.” They’re like children wandering around in the tunnels, uneducated, and no one was around to teach them because they just got left down there. So when Red shows up and tells these stories of the world above and their evil counterparts who take everything for granted, they believe it. They’re angry. They want revenge.

It’s all they were taught to know.

The human soul detail is interesting, because that means, theoretically, that Adelaide shouldn’t have a soul, and Red should. But what makes a soul, exactly? Red’s actions throughout the film seem soulless, after all. Her family are her tools that she uses to dispose of Adelaide’s family without a second thought. She kidnaps Jason without sparing a moment for her own son, burning alive just a few feet away…Adelaide, meanwhile, should be without a soul, but she’s extremely protective and caring.

I would posit that there are no villains in Us, not really, but it depends how you define it. Is someone a villain for wanting revenge on someone who stole their entire life? Is someone a villain for stealing someone else’s life, but then creating and caring for a family and always putting there safety first? Is someone a villain for wanting to have a life in the sun and to eat anything besides raw rabbit?

While Us tries to sell an “us vs. them” dynamic that pulls you in and convinces you the first time you see the movie, it’s just disorienting every time after that because you know. She’s not really an “us,” because she’s a “them.” She behaves like “us,” but that doesn’t mean anything because she’s still one of “them,” right?

*shrug emoji*

THE MESSAGE

So what does this all mean, exactly?

Again, Get Out had a very clear message: white people SUCK. Uh, I mean, racism is BAD and also still VERY MUCH A THING AND THAT IS NOT GOOD. Also, white people SUCK.

(No really, we’re the worst)

Us doesn’t do that, and it’s frustrating! JUST TELL US WHAT IT MEANS, PEELE!!

But what’s cool about all the ambiguity is that it allows people to make their own theory about the movie that connects with them personally. It’s like a choose-your-own-adventure as a movie!

So is Us a commentary on the death of the American dream? Sure!

Is it about the dangers of cloning and science going too far (case in point: the in-home security device playing “Fuck Tha Police” instead of calling the police)? Absolutely!

Is it about the duality of man and the dangers of ignoring rather than embracing that? Yeah!

Is it just a good, original movie with some good scares, great characters, amazing acting, and an interesting story? Why, yes!

My personal favorite theories involve classism: how the Tethered represent the poorer classes, essentially invisible to the well-off but still an essential part of their lives, whether they know it or not; how society can’t function if we ignore the poorer classes because they’re important, too, and it’s dangerous in multiple ways for us to just brush that off; how it’s absolutely possible to take someone “uneducated” and teach them kindness, and how that’s really more important than anything else; how the “Merlin’s Forest” re-branding of the mirror maze still featured a totem pole outside and was probably just in response to growing complaints about the racist attraction and was a really poor attempt to fix that #America; how many of the weapons used to kill the Tethered in the film were typical symbols of the rich (a boat, a golf club, a fancy rock), and therefore is symbolic of how the rich constantly kill the poor with all their fancy “necessary” toys.

Did you notice how the first Tethered up was the guy who killed the homeless man in the beginning?

Did you notice how, though people were morbidly fascinated, we didn’t hear anything in the news about it and no one seemed overly concerned about the death of a homeless man?

The use of Hands Across America ties into this, as well. The more I read about it, the more connected to Us it appears to be. Hands Across America was nowhere near as successful as it claimed to be, giving to charities only $15 million when they promised $50 million. Get this–it was also specifically set up to raise money to fight homelessness.

It was also during the Reagan years, and he apparently talked about how the poor are poor because they choose to be, and they’re just not smart enough to get out of it.

Did the Tethered choose to be what they were?

Do the poor?

When Gabe asks the Tethered family who they are, Red says “we’re Americans.”

The poor are Americans. The rich and well-off are Americans. They shouldn’t be treated so differently.

The point is, while these theories really hit home with me personally, they’re not the only ones out there, and they’re not the only ones that make sense. This movie can mean a million things, and I love it for that.

FAVORITE MOMENT

I’ve talked at length about the “Pas de deux” scene, and I genuinely think it’s probably my favorite. Even reading about the creation of that scene was fascinating to me; every detail was considered, down to the incredible physical differences between not only adult Adelaide and Red, but the teenage dancers as well. While adult Adelaide is injured, she hobbles on and swings desperately to get a hit in because she’s fueled by emotion–teenage Adelaide is graceful and swathed in bright light as she twirls smoothly across the stage. Adult Red walks in angles, almost never bends at the waist, and moves sharply and upright in contrast to Adelaide’s limbs flying everywhere–teenage Red has to follow teenage Adelaide’s steps, but she’s down below in a hallway and doesn’t have enough room, so she gets slammed into the walls and floor a lot.

Honestly I think it’s worth the price of admission alone, because it’s such an assault on all your senses (in a good way).

But I also really love the final moment of Jason glaring at Adelaide because he knowwwwwwws.

Also, he has a pet rabbit at the end. He did say he wanted a dog, so I mean…

“OOF” MOMENT

Pretty much all of them involve Gabe. I mean, he dabs in the beginning. And when he tells Zora that the human chain is “some kinda fucked-up performance art” the LOOK she gives him. Absolutely savage.

It’s not really “oof” in a “oh that was awkward for a movie” way, it’s more “oof, what a DAD” kind of thing.

SHOULD YOU TAKE YOURSELF TO SEE THIS MOVIE?

Well, if you couldn’t have guessed already, YES.

PLEASE DO.

Is it scary? Yes, it definitely is. But what I keep telling people is that I genuinely don’t think it’s as scary as the trailers would have you believe–the trailers made it seem like it would be “ALL JUMPSCARES/ALL HORROR, ALL THE TIME” and it really…wasn’t. And not in a bad way at all! It was just an interesting marketing choice, because it got people like me who do NOT like horror movies but liked Get Out and want more going “DAMMIT JORDAN” and I’m assuming it got real horror movie buffs going “…wait what.” (Again, I’m assuming. I have no horror aficionado friends, as evidenced by how long it took to convince people TO GO SEE THIS WITH ME)

If you read my Us soundtrack post (here!), you know I also went into Lupita Nyong’o’s “Horror Movie Homework” in preparation for working on Us. One of the movies I thought was an interesting choice was Funny Games, and while we may never know for sure why Jordan Peele had Nyong’o watch certain films and not others, it is interesting to note that the creator of Funny Games said specifically that the movie is a commentary on how violence is portrayed and glorified in the media. Could that be why Us was marketed as a typical horror film without a deeper meaning? Is there a commentary there?

Who knows. I don’t.

ANYWAY, the point is, Us is so much more than a horror movie, if that’s what you’re worried about. I genuinely think there is so much to enjoy about it, and so, so much to talk about afterwards. If you like stuff like that, you should see it!!

(I didn’t even get INTO all the rabbits, the symbolism of the underground classrooms, the symbolism of the names, the many appearances of the numbers 11:11, or the fact that the homeless man’s Tethered is named JEREMIAH AND THAT’S THE BOOK OF THE BIBLE THE VERSE ON HIS SIGN IS FROM. “JEREMIAH 11:11” I’M SO MAD ABOUT THIS THAT IS SUCH A COOL DETAIL AND I HAD TO DIG FOR IT)

All in all, I give Us

5/5 OMINOUS GOLDEN PAIRS OF SCISSORS!!

Ooh…yeah that last pair definitely did something to someone…oh no…

TRAILERS TO WATCH OUT FOR

I have such mixed feelings about Pet Sematary, guys. On the one hand, I think it’s interesting, I know it’s classic, and I’m drawn to it because I’m SUCH A FOUR. But on the other hand, just because I loved Us, doesn’t mean I can suddenly handle horror movies. I am a Weak Being. But…like…UGHHHHH so anyway. I MIGHT see it. I don’t know.

Listen I got dragged to the second John Wick movie with the guy I was seeing at the time, and I regretted it almost as much as when I got dragged to Kong: Skull Island. Actually…I might regret John Wick more…anyway, John Wick Chapter 3 is a thing. I probably won’t be seeing it. Someone could pay me, though. I can definitely be bought.

Little is another one of those movies that COULD be surprisingly good, or just really…really bad and cringey. I’ll probably wait till I read some reviews or something.

Ma looks ABSOLUTELY horrifying and it somehow made Octavia Spencer legitimately terrifying and I do NOT trust any movie that does that. It’s interesting in that it looks like it’s completely original, which as we’ve discussed, I really appreciate, but…oh it looks horrifying. Oh no.

Booksmart looks like it could be good, but it’s also kind of in the category of Little where it could also just be really bad. I mean it’s certainly going to be raunchy, as we can attest from the trailer. But who knows what it’s actually about?

I’m genuinely nervous and excited for Once Upon a Time in Hollywood because like…I freely admit I love both Leonardo DiCaprio AND Brad Pitt and they’re working together on this?? Iconic. Amazing. But also like…Margot Robbie is gonna be playing Sharon Tate, y’all. YOU KNOW WHAT THIS MEANS.

And that does it for this review! If you think you’d be up for Us, I really think it’s incredible and you should definitely see it. I get that the ambiguity isn’t for everyone (although apparently some people are upset that the final twist was made clear, they would have preferred that to be ambiguous. Which like…okay so you complain that it’s too ambiguous right now, and if the final twist HADN’T been confirmed? MORE AMBIGUITY IS WHAT YOU WANT?? Whatever) and that the horror factor is not a favorite, believe me, I know, but it’s so much more than all that.

Plus I can’t even begin to describe how fun it is to see the film in a crowded theater. Some of my favorite reactions include “aw HELL NAW” in response to Jason’s “there’s a family in our driveway” line, and a whole chorus of “NO, NO NO NO NO NO” in response to the Tethered family breaking into the house on cue.

If you’re up for it, take yourself to the movies and see Us.

Just, ya know…watch yourself.

Splicing Up the Details of the “Us” Soundtrack (and Lupita’s horror movie homework)

So Jordan Peele’s new nightmare, Us, opens TONIGHT!

Well, it opens tonight for all us normal people. Many who attended SXSW got to see it on March 8, and while everyone who saw it seems to LOVE it, they’re being very tight-lipped about the details.

I appreciate this, honestly, because there’s nothing quite like going into a Jordan Peele movie blind (I’m so thankful no one spoiled Get Out for me). So while we don’t know many details right now, #keepitbetweenUS, what we do know is that all the secrecy means one thing: PLOT TWISTS. PLOT TWISTS EVERYWHERE.

The soundtrack for Us came out just under a week ago, and since we all know how I feel about movie soundtracks, I thought I’d spend some time splicing apart whatever we can from the soundtrack itself and the track titles. After that we’ll take a look at Lupita Nyong’o’s horror movie homework to see what else we can speculate about…

What we’ll do is go through the list, track by track, and just speculate! Also included will be a drawing interpretation by me of what I think may happen in the movie based off of the music and the name of the song.

So, without further ado…

TRACK 1: “Anthem”

The soundtrack starts with “Anthem,” which lets you know from the very beginning that, just as Jordan Peele himself tweeted, Us is a horror movie. This first song is just real unsettling. There’s some kind of chanting going on, with a whole lot of white noise-esque sounds underneath it. The chanting builds, and underneath it, it sounds like we have one drum and a bunch of stringed instruments providing the rhythm. I can’t even begin to speculate what might be happening onscreen during this, but it probably isn’t good. It ends with some kind of minor chord strummed out, and it’s just…wow it’s unnerving.

By the way, the soundtrack is composed by Michael Abels, who also composed the soundtrack for-you guessed it-Get Out. I drew Jordan Peele here because I’m sure he had some say in it, but the real musical mastermind behind all of this is Michael Abels.

TRACK 2: “Outernet”

The next track is a shorter piece, and while I wouldn’t say it’s “happier” by any means, it’s definitely calmer. Strings play underneath a slow piano tune and there is no chanting to be heard anywhere!

This I’m assuming is when our main family is introduced: Adelaide, Gabe, Zora, and Jason. The song does kind of seem to set up an “everything’s fine…or is it” mood.

TRACK 3: “Spider”

I have NO idea what could possibly happen during this number. I tried looking through the cast to see if maybe there’s a character named “Spider,” but there doesn’t seem to be. This could be about an actual spider, of course. Maybe it serves as some sort of foreshadowing, or maybe it’s the first of those “things lining up” that Adelaide mentions in one of the trailers.

Either way, the song starts out somewhat pleasant and calm, like “Outernet,” but it builds up into, you guessed it, real unsettling.

I mean I thought the creepy animal of choice for this movie was a bunny…

…is there a type of bunny called “spider bunny”? IS THIS TIED INTO THE SPIDER-VERSE???

TRACK 4: “Ballet Memory”

This track is interesting-besides “Anthem,” it feels like the first track that really comes right out of a horror film. It builds up even more intensely than any of the other tracks, with strings all playing at once in all different notes. You can tell SOMETHING not good happens…

In the trailers, we do see glimpses of what appears to be some sort of ballet recital. Initially I thought the girl in the clips was Zora, but the cast list shows that there’s a “Young Adelaide” and a “Teenage Adelaide.” Since it is titled “Ballet Memory,” it’s possible the girl in the ballet clips is actually Adelaide. Perhaps she saw Red, her Tethered, as a child AND a teen…

TRACK 5: “Beach Walk”

This HAS to be referencing the beautiful shot in the trailers that shows the family walking along the beach with their shadows stretched behind them.

This is an interesting track, because while it should theoretically be a happy walk-yay vacation and seeing family friends!-it’s just as unnerving as anything else. The music is really gonna help remind us that, yes, this is a horror movie.

Also, the chanting from “Anthem” comes back in this track for a brief moment before we have some fun rhythm section stuff and squeaky strings. I say “fun” because it kind of is, but mostly it’s just creepy.

TRACK 6: “First Man Standing”

This title, I’m assuming, is referencing the clip in the trailers of the creepy guy Jason runs into on the beach. You know, the one in the tattered jacket facing away from Jason with two bloody fingers. That one!

This track is shorter as well, and actually most of it is kind of calm like “Outernet,” and then there’s a sudden build-up to what I’m assuming is the moment when Jason sees the creepy guy. Is he a Tethered? He looks like he has the iconic red jumpsuit, although he also has the weird green coat over it, so who knows.

TRACK 7: “Back to the House”

This, I’m assuming, is going to be a lot of Adelaide flashing back to her childhood since she thought she lost Jason on the beach (like we saw in the trailers). It’s definitely another unsettling little track, and since we all know what happens once they’re in the house…DON’T GO BACK TO THE HOUSE!!!

TRACK 8: “Keep You Safe”

This has to reference the scene in the trailers where Adelaide is talking to Jason about sticking with her so he’ll be safe. So obviously, Adelaide has had experiences with the Tethered, she knows what it did to her as a child, so it’s fascinating that she’d even agree to come back to this childhood home of hers in the first place…

There’s an interesting section in this track where the strings play a real intense melody that directly contrasts the calm mood of the beginning of the track-is this when Jason first notices…the family in the driveway???

TRACK 9: “Don’t Feel Like Myself”

This could be talking about a number of things, but I’m assuming at one point we have to jump to Elizabeth Moss’s character and her…unfortunate experience. We do see her having a brief conversation in her house with her husband in one trailer, and then of course there’s the iconic shot of her crawling to the camera.

So while I’m assuming this track is going to be about Kitty Tyler, it’s interesting that the track is called what it is…do the Tethered have some sort of possession abilities? How many times do we say that we “don’t feel like ourselves?”

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN

TRACK 10: “She Tried to Kill Me”

Based off of me thinking the previous track is about Kitty, I’m assuming then that the title of this track is referencing the moment where she’s crawling towards the camera…what if she gets into contact with Adelaide somehow and tells her that “she tried to kill me?”

If Adelaide is alerted that something is going on before their own Tethered’s show up, that would help explain why she seems to sort of know that something is wrong in the trailers after the “family in our driveway” line.

The other side of this is that this is actually another flashback of Adelaide’s-perhaps we get to see even more of her previous experiences with the Tethered.

Both this track and the previous are very similar-they’re not fast-paced by any means, but they’re eerie and suspenseful in a slow, creeping way. Again, you know something is wrong just by listening to it…if you played these tracks over footage of someone walking in a sunny garden, you’d be waiting for the ravenous zombie to jump out.

TRACK 11: “Boogieman’s Family”

This HAS to be this moment, when Jason says this and Gabe goes to investigate. We know the actual coming after them doesn’t start till the next track (based off the title).

I’m assuming based off this title that Jason called the bloody man on the beach the “Boogieman,” and so when he sees the other Tethered in the driveway, this is what he assumes-he has a family!

No chanting in this track, but there is some creepy choral “ooh-ing” alongside some unnerving string work. It’s just not a happy song, you guys.

TRACK 12: “Home Invasion”

Aaaaand the Tethered have joined the film!

This, of course, must be when the Tethered family breaks into the Wilson’s home. You can tell in the music EXACTLY when the actual invading starts…there’s a creepy, slow build-up before sudden strings and then everything is fast-paced and as unsettling as ever.

This is one of the longer songs on the soundtrack, which means this whole invasion scene is gonna be long and drawn-out and I JUST. That whole concept is absolutely my worst nightmare, why would you elongate it like this. Why.

Is it because it’s nightmare-inducing? Yeah. Yeah that’s it.

TRACK 13: “Once Upon a Time”

This is a little more difficult to figure out…we go from intense home-invasion music to slow, drawling strings and a title like that (also, the “ooh-ing” choir is back!)…I initially thought maybe this was Adelaide finally telling her family about her previous experiences with these things, but it’s odd that the Tethered would just let her talk for that long without like…killing all of them. If that is their goal! We don’t know!!

It’s also possible that maybe this is Red telling the story…maybe discussing the flashbacks we’ve already seen from her perspective.

Anyway. This is a real creepy track.

TRACK 14: “Run”

This is, without a doubt, my favorite song on the soundtrack. Up to this point, all the songs have kind of fit together, with their chanting and “ooh-ing” and long, drawn-out stringed instrument notes…but this song?

There’s a slow, menacing drum beat almost the whole way through, with short string notes played in between and all around but at different moments, and sometimes they make shrieking noises and sometimes they build-up without the drums and then silence…right before the drums kick back in.

There’s a brief section near the end that plays the melody the strings are plucking out with a piano, a moment where I’m assuming everyone thinks they’ve escaped and everything’s fine….BUT NOPE.

It’s still unsettling, of course, but what I think is really fascinating is that it’s called “Run.” It’s not a quick song at all-the constant drum beat does not sound like someone running, it sounds like someone marching. I’m assuming, of course, this means that the Wilson’s are running for their lives and all, but the fact that it’s not fast-paced music urging them on almost makes it scarier. It’s slow, it’s loud, it’s constant…it’s a little terrifying.

Compare it to “Escape the Subway” from the Spider-verse soundtrack-another song where the lead is running from the villain, but that song is fast-paced, it sounds like someone is definitely running!

This sounds like even if someone is running, they don’t actually have a chance.

TRACK 15: “Into the Water”

Since there’s a track later that actually mentions the boat in the title, it’s possible this isn’t referencing the boat at all. Still, I’m assuming this is some kind of attempted escape involving…the water.

Is water their weakness? IS THIS LIKE SIGNS ALL OVER AGAIN???

Probably not.

This track feels a lot more disjointed than some of the others-the music starts heading one direction before stopping abruptly and turning the complete other way with a new melody and new instruments. There’s a small section that’ll sound like running, then a sudden drum beat, then slow, constant, eerie strings…

I dunno, fam. I just wanna know how the pun boats will help the family.

TRACK 16: “Spark in the Closet”

I’m guessing this track is the one the plays during the scene we saw in the trailer of Jason and his Tethered, Pluto, in the closest together. With fire.

This is also the scene where Pluto takes his mask off and we see all his horrible burn scars on his face.

What is Pluto’s obsession with fire??? IS IT BECAUSE WATER IS THEIR WEAKNESS? PLUTO DID YOU NEVER PLAY POKÉMON?? FIRE IS WEAK TO WATER THAT DOESN’T HELP AT ALL!!! GET YOURSELF A BULBASAUR AND YOU’LL BE FINE

TRACK 17: “Escape to the Boat”

This is one of the only truly fast-paced and intense songs on the soundtrack, at least in the beginning. It slows down just as the instruments build, so WHO KNOWS WHAT THAT MEANS.

Based off the title, I’m assuming this is like, everyone makes a break for the boat. I’m also assuming this doesn’t work since we’re only about halfway through the soundtrack.

Also-the creepy chanting is back! Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaay!

TRACK 18: “Femme Fatale”

This is actually another one of my favorite tracks, I think.

Based off the title and what we see of Adelaide in the trailers, I’m assuming this is referencing her being a total badass.

It’s interesting, though, because the first half of the track sounds like it was ripped from a romance scene from a black-and-white movie. Or like, maybe Gone with the Wind. Then, once the creepiness comes in, the same theme distorts and the drums from “Run” are back. It’s just so unsettling and interesting and I JUST WANT TO KNOW WHAT IT MEANS!!!

It’s also possible this actually references Red. Like maybe the happy-ish music from the beginning is Red, and then the distortion is Adelaide coming after her…

We don’t really know that the Tethered are bad, do we…?

TRACK 19: “Silent Scream”

I’m guessing this is referencing the brief moment we catch in the trailers of Adelaide screaming while holding…someone. It’s too quick to catch who it is that she’s holding, buuuut….I’m assuming it isn’t…..good……

Also, for a track titled the way it is, it sure is anything but silent. It’s loud, with lots of instruments and melodies battling it out for dominance.

Basically, I’m assuming things are going really well by this point in the film. I’m sure everything’s fine.

TRACK 20: “News Report”

We see at least a couple shots in the trailers of the beach just…littered with what I’m assuming are corpses. Basically everyone in the cast is listed as playing two characters, which means everyone in the town has a Tethered, and they all attacked on that one night…for some reason.

Also rabbits are everywhere.

Since many of the shots are in daylight, we know that the attack starts with the home invasion at night but goes on into the next day, which is when I’m assuming the mysterious news report takes place.

Does the reporter live through the end of the film??? Probably not, but we’ll see.

TRACK 21: “Zora Drives”

This track, clearly, is about Zora driving-we do see her behind the wheel for a moment in the trailers.

The big question then, of course, is why she’s driving-what happened to lead to that point?? WHERE ARE ADELAIDE AND GABE.

This track also introduces us to a really creepy string tune that plays throughout the track at different speeds…so that’s…fun.

TRACK 22: “Death of Umbrae”

We know from the cast list that Zora’s Tethered is named Umbrae…so um…she apparently doesn’t make it.

This tells us a couple things-aside from the fact that yes, Umbrae dies, it tells us that the Tethered can be killed. There’s a way, somehow, for them to die.

Does Zora hit her with the car? Is that it?

This track features an “ahh-ing” choir and somber string notes. So I’m assuming her death is something dramatic and intense and maybe…not a good thing?

TRACK 23: “Somber Ride”

With a title like that, you’d expect like…something slow, something contemplative, something, ya know, somber? It’s not really. The strings are certainly somber, still super creepy, but there’s a drum beat that carries through most of the track to take away any element of “somber.”

It also makes me think, again, since this is the track following Umbrae’s death, maaaaaybe her death wasn’t such a good thing…

For example, what happens if your Tethered dies? Just how tethered together are the two of you? Does Umbrae’s death affect Zora in some way??

TRACK 24: “Immolation”

“Immolation” is, apparently, some kind of sacrifice, usually involving fire.

I’m assuming then that it has to do with Pluto somehow, since he’s the one attached to fire. The track itself has an interesting build-up, with intense choral singing leading into lots of “ahh-ing” combined with a quick-paced string melody and lots of drums. It certainly sounds like the build-up to some kind of sacrifice, but why is a sacrifice necessary?

Is it that a sacrifice is necessary to kill the Tethered? In that case, who was the sacrifice for Umbrae’s death?

What does ANY OF THIS MEAN???

TRACK 25: “Down the Rabbit Hole”

We’re now getting into the tracks that truly confuse me. I really don’t get the rabbit thing…why are they everywhere? Why is there rabbit IMAGERY everywhere??

The title is, of course, an Alice in Wonderland reference, but why? Alice never had a double of herself that I recall, although there is the whole Through the Looking Glass thing. We do see at least some mirror imagery in the trailers, so maybe that’s what the reference really is…

I dunno. It’s a cool track, though-it has a fun build-up to some fast-paced string melodies and some intense drum work. Clearly something dramatic happens!

TRACK 26: “Performance Art”

Look, the title was giving me nothing, and it’s almost impossible to speculate what could be happening at this point in the film.

Now we know that we have some ballet references in here, so that’s what the title could be referring to, but we don’t really know for sure.

Are the bunnies a performance art? IS THAT WHAT THEY MEAN??

TRACK 27: “Human”

Ah yes, the age-old question.

Something at this point in the film discusses the idea of being “human,” I’m assuming. Are the Tethered human? Are the Wilson’s any more or less human than the Tethered? Do certain actions taken throughout the film challenge that idea of being human? Does killing someone make you more or less human? If the Tethered aren’t human, does killing them make you more or less human?

I have no idea if that’s the rabbit hole (GET IT?? THESE ARE THE JOKES!!) the film will go down with this track or not, but it’s certainly an interesting concept.

The track itself is generally much more slow-paced than the previous ones leading up to it. It still has the creepy choir, but it’s generally more contemplative than the quick and creepy string melodies from before.

TRACK 28: “Battle Plan”

Aaaand we’re back to the chanting and the fast-paced strings and drums!!

This is a shorter track, again, but it’s full of determination! I’m assuming it’s a battle plan Adelaide comes up with, but again, we don’t know if the Tethered are actually villains or not…maybe this is the Wilson’s helping the Tethered overcome an entirely different enemy.

WHO KNOWS. I DON’T.

TRACK 29: “Pas de deux”

Another one of my favorite tracks!!

If you’ve watched the trailers…semi-obsessively hunting for clues like I have, then this track should sound familiar to you-this is the creepy remixed part of “I Got 5 On It” that we hear in the trailers, minus the actual “I Got 5 On It” section.

If you aren’t familiar with ballet terms (or you’re not a weeb like I freely admit I am and didn’t watch Princess Tutu ever), a pas de deux literally translates to “step of two” in French. It’s a duet dance, and a staple of any ballet.

Since we know ballet plays some kind of key role in this, it’s fascinating to me that this song comes after “Battle Plan.” A dance for two is part of the plan? Obviously it doesn’t have to be an actual dance, could be a metaphor, whatever, but can you imagine if their plan was actually dancing? GET ‘EM, ADELAIDE.

Also though, you can’t be talking about the duality of people and ballet without mentioning, of course, Swan Lake. The whole point of the story is that the white swan loses her love because the black swan, her evil double, deceives the prince and takes her place.

The more I think about it, the more I think it’s interesting that Black Swan was not one of the movies in Lupita Nyong’o’s homework stash, but more on that later…

TRACK 30: “They Can’t Hurt You”

This track reminds me a lot of “Keep You Safe” actually, both musically and in title. This is clearly the “calm after the storm” song. The battle has been won…they can’t hurt you.

But again, it’s unclear whether this is referencing the Wilson clan or the Tethered clan. Maybe it’s not referencing any of them at all.

What I really love about this song is that it’s actually hopeful sounding! It takes the creepy melody from “Pas de deux” and plays it slowly, on a piano, in a major key so it sounds uplifting rather than scary.

As “happy” as this song is (I’m hesitant to call any of this happy, it might mean nothing…), it’s not actually…the ending, much as it feels like it could be.

TRACK 31: “Finale”

DAMMIT, PEELE.

This song starts out sounding like a finale would. It’s slow, it’s peaceful, it sounds like the music that would play over someone picking up the pieces of their lives to start over after something awful happened.

It starts out sounding like maybe, everything’s fine. And even if it’s not fine in that moment, it will be, eventually.

BUT THEN.

The strings in the background change, a more haunting melody starts playing, and then it transitions back into that DAMN CHANTING. Things get faster, the chanting is there, everything sounds unhappy again, and then the piano version of the “Pas de deux” melody plays but it no longer sounds hopeful.

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN AND WHY IS IT LIKE THIS.

It’s also possible that this is the music that plays over the end credits. Which is fine, it does mean…theoretically, that the movie is indeed over by that point, but it still leaves you feeling like it isn’t quite over, there’s more to figure out. And actually, from what people have said, it is certainly a film you may need to see more than once to fully grasp it.

TRACK 32: “I Got 5 On It (Tethered Mix from US)”

Now if you’re like me, all you wanted was access to the fabulous creepy remix of “I Got 5 On It” used in the trailer. AND WE GOT IT.

I love, love, LOVE this remix. It’s soooo unnerving but also extremely catchy??

Plus, I absolutely love that the remix version that has haunted us for the past couple months is in the official soundtrack in “Pas de deux.” We’ve all been thinking about this song subconsciously, and then we’re gonna hear it in theatres and OUR MINDS WILL JUST EXPLODE.

So that about does it for the soundtrack, and what little I can pull from what we have. If you’re curious, absolutely go check it out on Spotify or Apple Music/iTunes. Or like I think some of it is on YouTube.

So now…

Lupita Nyong’o Had Some Homework

Before filming Us, Jordan Peele gave lead actress Lupita Nyong’o some horror movie homework to prepare. We know which films he had her watch, so let’s break those down a little, shall we?

1. Dead Again

PLOT: A mute woman suffering from amnesia arrives at an orphanage, and a private detective and a hypnotist are tasked with finding out who she is. Thanks to the hypnotist, Mute Woman starts regaining her voice and some extremely vivid memories of a famous couple from the 1940’s (from what I can tell, the speculation is that the husband murdered the wife, but they don’t know for sure). Mute Woman and Detective start falling in love, but they bear a striking resemblance to the 1940’s couple…Mute Woman starts wondering if Detective will kill her so she’ll be dead…again.

WHAT THIS COULD MEAN: Ummmm…I mean, okay, it’s possible that this might reference the Tethered’s connection to the other characters. Maybe the Tethered represent how they died in another life, and they need to make sure the cycle keeps going. I guess. Or they just want their respective characters to remember how they died so they don’t repeat the same mistakes?

2. The Shining

PLOT: Jack, a writer struggling with writer’s block, becomes the winter caretaker of the isolated Overlook Hotel. He takes his wife and son with him. Once they’re snowed in, however, supernatural forces in the hotel start plaguing Jack so that he becomes hellbent on terrorizing his family, just as his son’s visions and premonitions get worse…

WHAT THIS COULD MEAN: Okay, so basically everyone at least knows of The Shining, right? What this says to me is that there’s possibly some supernatural influence about Adelaide’s hometown in particular. After all, it at least seems that all her experiences with the Tethered are tied to that town, and that town alone. I hope it doesn’t mean that Gabe’s gonna go crazy and try to kill everyone. Or maybe Jason and Zora have premonitions?

3. The Babadook

PLOT: An exhausted widow caring for her six-year-old son by herself is plagued still by the grief of her husband’s death in a car accident (on their way to the hospital while she was in labor, no less). One night, her son asks her to read from a storybook called “Mister Babadook” about a weird creature who torments people once they’re aware of it. Of course, it starts doing just that…

WHAT THIS COULD MEAN: If you haven’t seen The Babadook, well, small spoiler warning now in effect. The big debate about the film is whether or not the Babadook is actually real or if it’s just a metaphor for how we sometimes let grief control us. So this could mean that the Tethered are not actually real, but a metaphor for something else that we feel is connected to us…or something. Or they are very, very real.

4. It Follows

PLOT: A group of friends (and one girl in particular) spend the entire film pursued by an entity that can take the form of any person at all. The entity’s hunt is passed along via sex, so if you want to get rid of it, you have sex with someone to pass it on and then it’s their problem. The friends team up to try and find a way to kill the entity, and just when you think they’ve succeeded, a figure is seen walking behind our two leads…

WHAT THIS COULD MEAN: Like The Babadook, It Follows is actually more of a metaphorical horror film discussing the danger and stigmas of STDs. So, again, this could be referring to the idea that the Tethered are not actually real creatures, but a representation of something else, something that affects humans in a different, monstrous way.

5. A Tale of Two Sisters

PLOT: The story follows Su-mi, a teenage girl who was just released from a mental institution after being treated for shock and psychosis. She lives with her father, her stepmother, and her younger sister. As the film goes on, it becomes more clear that everything we’re seeing, everything Su-mi is seeing, may not be real at all. The house is filled with ghosts…

WHAT THIS COULD MEAN: Again, if you haven’t seen A Tale of Two Sisters, spoiler warning!! The big twist is that Su-mi actually has DID, or Dissociative identity disorder. She actually plays herself, her stepmother, AND her younger sister. Many of the scenes where we saw other actors were actually Su-mi talking with herself. There are definitely ghosts in the house, many of the characters see them, and one such ghost is indeed Su-mi’s sister. Su-mi’s sister died when a wardrobe fell on top of her, and the stepmother found her…and didn’t help. That’s why Su-mi was in the mental institution in the beginning of the movie. Now again, this could mean that the Tethered are some kind of dead ghost versions of the characters, or maybe they’re alternate personalities of them.

6. The Birds

PLOT: Melanie, a young socialite, visits her romantic interest Mitch at his seaside hometown. As she stays and meets more of the people there, more and more mysterious bird attacks keep happening. Melanie herself is attacked by a seagull on the way into the bay. As the bird attacks escalate, so too does the paranoia of the townspeople as they desperately search for a way to survive, and someone to blame.

WHAT THIS COULD MEAN: Well some of the connections are clear already-someone visiting a seaside hometown where mysterious and unexplained attacks start occurring. There is a lot of potential symbolism in The Birds, ranging from the metaphor of women being birds to the idea that we should be more careful how we treat nature. I’m not sure whether any of those messages directly connect to Us, but we’ll have to wait to see. One interesting thing to note is that while The Birds starts out with the birds caged up while the humans can move about freely, by the end, it is clear that the humans are caged up and trapped while the birds can move about freely. Again, not sure if that ties in at all, I just think it’s neat.

7. Funny Games

PLOT: A family of four (including a dog) arrive for vacation at their lakeside house, where they meet with their rather strange neighbors. Strange things keep happening, but it doesn’t become really sinister until the two neighbors then take the family hostage and force them to play a number of “games” with them in order to stay alive.

WHAT THIS COULD MEAN: The movie itself is cruel and grueling to sit through, and it’s supposed to be. It’s completely hopeless from the start, and the audience knows this, but it’s still hard to watch. Spoilers ahead: every single family member is nonchalantly offed by the end, and then it starts all over with a different family. While the home invasion connection is clear, I’m hoping that the Tethered’s goal is not to simply play games with Wilson’s in order for them to stay alive, because there has to be more to it then that. What is interesting is that the director for Funny Games has made it very clear that it is meant to be a commentary on how violence is presented in the media. It’s not supposed to be a film for entertainment because violence shouldn’t be entertaining. Now, whether or not that ties into Us or not remains to be seen. Another important element of Funny Games is all the fourth wall breaking done by the two villains. They make it clear time and again that this is a movie, and they have total control over it.

8. Martyrs

PLOT: A young abused girl escapes her torment and winds up at an orphanage, where she befriends another girl there. The first girl, Lucie, tells her new friend, Anna, about her abuse and how she feels she is constantly tortured by some mysterious ghost woman. 15 years later, Lucie is on the hunt for the family that abused her as a child, and ends up killing an entire family she believes to be responsible. Anna is horrified by this, and Lucie is “attacked” by the ghost woman in front of her; Anna only sees Lucie attacking herself. Later in the film, Anna meets the people who tortured Lucie, learning she is one of many. The group is set on discovering the secrets of the afterlife by creating “martyrs.”

WHAT THIS COULD MEAN: The first obvious connection is that the mysterious ghost woman haunting Lucie isn’t real; it’s a manifestation of her guilt. When she escaped as a child, she left another girl behind, and that is what haunts her. So again, the Tethered may not be real, but instead a manifestation of something else. There’s also the potential connection again that the Tethered are the dead versions of the other characters. Maybe they got that way because they are “martyrs” in some sense of the word. From what I understand, Martyrs is another film that’s real hard to sit through, and the entire third act is just the audience being forced to watch Anna go through a whole lot of torture. So that’s…pleasant.

9. Let the Right One In

PLOT: The movie follows Oskar, a 12-year-old boy plagued by bullies and filled with ideas on how to get revenge on them. He never is able to go through with it. One day, a girl his age moves in next door named Eli. Despite Eli’s insistence that they can never be friends, the two do form a bond of sorts. Oskar is able to stand up to his bullies because of Eli’s encouragement, but the real trouble kicks in when Oskar learns what Eli is: a vampire.

WHAT THIS COULD MEAN: It’s interesting to note that Peele’s list specifically focuses on this Swedish movie and not the English remake, Let Me In. While this movie is certainly a horror movie-lots of killings and vampiric activities-the big emphasis of the film is the relationship between Oskar and Eli. In the English remake, much more emphasis was put on the horror elements of the film, not the relationship. So this could mean that perhaps there is some sort of relationship built between one or more of the characters and their Tethered counterparts. Perhaps it’s Jason and Pluto, since we see them have an interesting seemingly non-violent encounter in a closet. Or maybe the Tethered are vampires. Who knows!

10. The Sixth Sense

PLOT: The film follows Malcolm, a child psychologist, and his current patient, Cole. Cole is plagued with visions of dead people, and Malcolm is tasked with helping him with his visions while at the same time healing the broken relationship with his wife who doesn’t seem to want to even talk to him anymore.

WHAT THIS COULD MEAN: If for some reason you haven’t seen The Sixth Sense yet, PLEASE DO SO. DO IT NOW BEFORE YOU READ FURTHER. It’s a brilliant plot twist and you must go into it blind!! Okay, for everyone else…this could mean a number of things. It could mean, again, that the Tethered are ghosts of some kind. It could mean that they don’t actually want to harm the Wilson’s or anyone else, they just need help. It could mean that the Wilson’s aren’t even alive themselves. I mean, The Sixth Sense has a thing with the color red…the Tethered wear red jumpsuits……I DUNNO, FAM.

It’s all speculation

While it’s super fun picking apart the soundtrack and the movie list, it’s still all speculation, and so far, only people who have seen the movie know what’s really going on, AND THEY’RE KEEPING IT BETWEEN THEM. #rude

I mean I’m thankful, but also…tell me everything.

Anyway, I’m really looking forward to Us. I pick up something new from Get Out every time I watch it, and I’m hoping Us will be the same way. It’s my favorite kind of film-one that makes you think about it long after you’ve left the theatre.

Let me know if you’ve seen it and you loved it, or if you’re going to see it and are excited, or if you’re just avoiding it because it looks terrifying. Honestly, that’s fair. I’m terrified, too, I’m just inexplicably drawn to it. It’s because I’m a 4 on the Enneagram. It’s a curse.

…maybe the Tethered are part of some curse on the town??? WHAT ARE THEY??????

Miss Bala 2019 Review

but like hear me out, even the tagline is misleading because…she doesn’t really change, it’s just her though? I mean she gets a gun but she doesn’t even really use it, my dudes

So a couple days ago, I took myself to the movies and saw Miss Bala, which WOW, that trailer was misleading. It wasn’t misleading in a bad way, at least in my opinion, but I can see where some people may have gone to see it expecting one movie, and then they got an entirely DIFFERENT movie.

So what was this movie, billed as an intense action-thriller starring Gina Rodriguez ruining a whole bunch of men’s lives in an incredible red dress?

So hear me out, in some ways, it was exactly that. But it was also so much more.

So let’s learn all about the incredible power of female friendship because, and I cannot stress this enough, THAT’S what Miss Bala is really about.

if only we could all look as put together while we contemplate our life decisions

THE PLOT

The movie begins following Gloria Fuentes (Gina Rodriguez), a professional makeup artist who dreams of being more and maybe like even a designer one day instead of following the same old boring canned designs? She and the audience get a grim in-your-face reminder of her position when her supervisor flat-out says “we don’t pay you to think.”

Great, thanks for that.

But it can only bring her down for so long, because after the fashion show, Gloria heads down to Tijuana, Mexico to spend the weekend with her best friend Suzu (Cristina Rodlo). Suzu is entering the Miss Baja California pageant, and Gloria, naturally, will be her makeup artist. There’s a really fun scene where they sign up and the pageant coordinator gives her a once-over and Gloria’s all “oh yeah I’m not entering” and the coordinator just full-out Regina George is like “oh I didn’t think so.” (Like?? has she SEEN Gina Rodriguez???) Suzu takes on the audience’s reaction and is ready to THROW DOWN with this coordinator, but Gloria talks her out of it.

Later that night, Gloria is practicing Suzu’s makeup and they have a really sweet heart-to-heart about how they’re family and all and Suzu gives Gloria this dorky adorable friendship bracelet she made her and it’s all very nice.

BUT ENOUGH OF THAT HAPPY STUFF, we cut to Suzu and Gloria heading to a club to shmooze with some of the pageant higher-ups (Suzu drops the plot point here that the chief of police tends to sleep with the pageant winner every year BUT IT’S A RUMOR OKAY EVERYTHING’S FINE). Gloria heads to the bathroom after Mr. Chief of Police GROPES her, but she doesn’t want to ruin Suzu’s chance at winning, so she just quietly leaves. In the stall, though, she sees and hears a group of guys break in through the ceiling vent and um, they got guns. One of them finds Gloria and pulls her out, which is where she first makes eye contact with the leader, Lino Esparza (Ismael Cruz Cordova). Though egged on to shoot Gloria because she’s seen them, Lino seems to find her intriguing because she’s an American. He tells her she has ten seconds to get out.

Gloria desperately tries to get to Suzu in the crowded club, but it’s too late-the guys open fire on the club and it’s chaos. Gloria barely makes it out, but she still cannot find Suzu (though she keeps passing girls who could be her, but they keep getting shot or hurt and it’s jarring). She ends up spending the night in a cafe with other survivors, with Suzu not answering her phone. Gloria finds a policeman outside, says she’s a survivor and she saw the men who did this. The policeman offers to take her to the station, but something’s wrong. Instead, he takes her to a hotel, and she is grabbed by none other than Lino Esparza’s men.

She is later barely able to escape after being forced to leave a car with a bomb inside parked outside a safehouse. Because of this, she is captured by the DEA, and told she will only be released if she delivers Lino to the DEA.

The rest of the movie is a tense back-and-forth between Gloria and her life with Esparza’s men, all while desperately searching for Suzu. Can she save Suzu and escape from a life of crime, or will she be forced to live out her days as a slave to Esparza’s gang, forever wondering what happened to her dear friend?

this is basically the movie, various men telling Gloria what to do while she just death-stares the entire time

THE REVIEW

Even from the plot summary, it sounds like the movie that was advertised. I mean, isn’t it, in some way, a version of Taken? I mean even the tagline “who would you become to save your family?” I mean it’s…it’s Taken, you guys.

Except it’s not. Now don’t get me wrong, I actually liked Taken when I saw it, but this is not that movie. The way it’s billed, you think Gloria will develop some kind of relationship with Lino and be his gang queen or something, but really she’s doing it to save her friend so it’s all a lie. And like…that is not what happens. You can tell it’s what Lino wants to happen (except for the it being all a lie part)-he’s obsessed with Gloria pretty much from the moment he sees her. He is beyond happy to control her and make her special, groom her into being his “queen.”

But Gloria? She is having NONE of that.

Even when it seems hopeless, and it seems hopeless a LOT, Gloria never loses sight of her goal: Suzu. Saving Suzu is all she wants. She is not in it for any kind of sick relationship with Lino or DEA guy (SPOILER granted, DEA guy doesn’t really last long enough to even make it a possibility but also he kinda betrayed Gloria so we don’t care for him that much tbh).

Now, are there action-packed scenes as advertised? Yes, of course. But you know how in movies with Arnold Schwarzenegger or Liam Neeson or I guess Dwayne Johnson is doing stuff like that now whatever ANYWAY, generally in movies like that, the action scenes are “fun?” They’re always played to show you how impossibly immortal our main guy is, or how weird and ridiculous some of the stunts can get. They’re played to bring out your inner animal to cheer for all the destruction or something I guess, I’ve never enjoyed stuff like that so I can’t speak for why they’re the way they are. The action scenes in this movie are never enjoyable, they’re never there to show off stunts and grunts and whatever else you look for. These scenes are appropriately horrific. The shootout in the club at the beginning is terrifying and stressful, the stand-off in the lot between the gang and the DEA is tense and difficult, and the final assault on the party, despite it being the most played up in the trailer, is scary. It just is.

And honestly? It’s one of the things I appreciate the most about the movie. It felt real, not just played up for entertainment.

I could go on about that for a while, but there are other reasons this movie isn’t the movie that was advertised. I’ll go into those more down below.

So it’s not the movie that was advertised-but is it good?

Honestly? It’s pretty okay.

Like The Kid Who Would Be King, I don’t think this is a movie that’ll win any awards. It’s a little messy, especially in the beginning, and the ending kinda comes out of nowhere. Plus, even though it knows what movie it wants to be, it was not advertised as such, so people don’t really know what to do with it. Plus apparently it’s very loosely based off of a 2011 Mexican film of the same name, so some people have an issue with that.

Look, despite the messiness, I still think there are interesting and good things in this film-plus, Gina Rodriguez is a goddess.

I can’t fully detail my opinion here, so let’s just dive in deeper and discuss.

Spoilers ahead!!

what do you mean she doesn’t look like she’s in the middle of a shootout in this picture isn’t that what you’d look like

THE MUSIC

I really liked the music! I don’t think there was any one musical moment that really stood out to me, although the club shootout was eerie because the club music kept playing over the carnage which was just…very unsettling. Effective, but also just kind of…blech.

Actually, having looked up the soundtrack on Spotify, I can say that the sweet guitar theme in the song called “Gloria & Suzu” is adorable and sweet, and then “Gloria Drives” is a direct contradiction and is super suspenseful and just ACK.

Also, we have to talk about the end credits song “Call the Shots” by Leslie Grace because DAMN. The lyrics are exactly why I like what I do like about this movie, and we’ll get into why in a later section. But seriously, this song is good. Add it to your “empowerment” playlist.

man this entire scene where he flips her hair all over on one side and she just glares at him in the mirror like AHHHH

THE CHARACTERS

Probably appropriately, we don’t have a lot of characters to discuss because a lot of them don’t get fully developed (I mean many of them do die so).

We have to start with our leading lady, light of my soul, Gloria Fuentes. I’m probably biased because I would die for Gina Rodriguez, but Gloria is a wonderful lead to follow through the movie. Again, her goal the entire time is just to find and save her best friend, and it’s just so pure and good you want her to succeed. Gloria is not perfect of course. She breaks down a lot on various jobs from Lino, I mean girl is scared, all right, and in order to save herself she accidentally helps her new comrade Isabel get…killed. You could argue that it is that scene, however, that helps to solidify her actions in the final act. Anyway, point is, Gloria is a good character to follow, and she is smart, capable, and has a good arc-we’re happy that she wins in the end because she deserves it. She is constantly underestimated by the men in the film, and she lets them, partly because she is used to it, but also because it leads to their downfall in many cases and her victory. Fools.

Suzu is, unfortunately, absent from much of the film, but she is an absolute ray of sunshine when she is onscreen. This is good because we have to want her to be rescued. In the little bit we do see of her, she clearly cares for Gloria a lot, and she just genuinely wants to win Miss Baja California. She is too pure and good and I’m so happy she’s okay in the end. I mean, unfortunately, she’s changed because of what happened to her, but she does get rescued.

Lino Esparza is a fascinating villain, and the more I think about it, the more I’m glad they depicted him the way they did. The movie does a fantastic job of painting him as a monster and a human. He does terrible, terrible things. He kills without a second thought. He has no problem ordering Gloria to strip for him, to lie down next to him, to untie his boots for him. He is absolutely drunk on the power he owns because he believes he deserves it. But…he’s dang attractive! And he at least seems to care for Gloria, sort of, but more importantly, look! He has a sweet family who cooks delicious food and there are children and he’s great with them and one day he just wants to buy that land so they just own it and awwww!! Lino is humanized to some degree for both the audience and Gloria, but never so much that we forget how awful he is. He’s well-rounded, and that’s important!

There are other characters, like I mentioned, but they’re not developed or even really important in the way that those three are. Lino has a henchman who never trusts Gloria and treats Isabel like a sex slave. DEA guy Brian has no soul (he tells Gloria there will be a SWAT guy available to get her out of the standoff, but when Gloria says there isn’t anyone there, he just says “k you’re on your own bye” LIKE. EXCUSE YOU). Suzu has a little brother who is Gloria’s godson and he is precious and also comes out unharmed! Isabel is precious, if I could have made any changes, it would have been to have both her AND Gloria take Lino’s crew down, but I get why her death happened.

Basically, the characters that were developed are well-developed, and that’s important. There aren’t a lot of them, but there don’t really need to be. We don’t need to know Henchman #1’s entire backstory to dislike him for the way he behaves towards Isabel. DEA guy Brian had plenty of character development in the betrayal scene and that was all I needed to know about him honestly.

Gina Rodriguez cries a lot in this movie and can I just say how illegal that should be

THE TWIST

I guess the first twist is in the middle when Gloria saves Lino in the lot standoff, but that was shown in the trailer so doesn’t count. The big twist comes at the very end.

Throughout the film, Gloria has been asking Lino to help her find Suzu because he promised. He dances around the topic a lot, but that’s just kind of how he is so it’s not really suspicious…until it is.

The ultimate plan is for Gloria to infiltrate the Miss Baja California pageant and win so that she can be invited to the Chief of Police’s room (yeah that rumor where he sleeps with the winner? HAHA NOT A RUMOR). Once there, Esparza’s men will attack and take him down so that she can find Suzu.

At the party, Gloria does find Suzu! But when she pulls Suzu aside to talk, she discovers something awful-Suzu was sold into a sex-trafficking ring run by none other than Lino Esparza himself. She has a tattoo on her hand that matches the one on Lino’s back-a tattoo logo.

So the whole time Lino was pretending to be looking for Suzu, he knew exactly where she was.

Filled with fury at this revelation but being taken to the Chief of Police’s room now, she decides to ruin the plan. She writes on a card to show to the Chief of Police that Lino Esparza is coming to kill him. This of course leads to a gigantic shootout that Gloria walks through (remember that footage from the trailer with her in the red dress? Mmm. Yep.).

There, she finds both Suzu…and Lino. Lino, still playing innocent, tells Gloria “see! I told you we’d find her!” But Gloria is having none of it. She asks Suzu to show Lino her hand with the tattoo. So Lino knows now, but even though Gloria’s pointing a gun at him, he doesn’t think she’ll shoot (this mirrors an earlier scene where he was teaching her to shoot and she had the gun pointed at him for a time). Unlike earlier though, she does take the shot. This ties in to the bigger theme of the film:

I have a lot of feelings about this dress

THE THEME

Underestimating women, but especially Gloria, is what I would argue to be the main theme of the film.

Throughout the entire film, Gloria is underestimated by every man she comes in contact with. Her supervisor? She “doesn’t get paid to think.” DEA guy Brian? Cool if she can bring them Lino, but if not, she’ll be another casualty in the standoff and not his problem. Henchman #1? He just doesn’t want her to distract Lino, but of course she can’t be the mole. Also, she’s a terrible cook who sets the kitchen on fire (newsflash: she did it on purpose as part of her plan and also you’re an idiot). And most of all: Lino Esparza. He thinks Gloria is fascinating and he likes her because she’s American, like he was. He senses some fight in her, but not enough to do anything about it. He degrades her by touching her, ordering her around, dressing her up, by owning her. He teaches her to shoot because he wants her to be able to defend herself on their next job because obviously she’s totally going to stay with him, but he does not think she will shoot him even when she’s pointing a gun at him.

Women are objects for men throughout the film. It’s ironic that part of the last job takes place at a beauty pageant, something famously ridiculed for the way it showcases women. Suzu is sold as a sex slave, and she’s entering this pageant knowing, probably, that if she wins she may have no choice but to sleep with the Chief of Police. Isabel is absolutely a sex slave for Henchman #1, and both she and Gloria are immediately delegated to cooking for the men at their hideout. Every party shown in the movie has obvious shots of women in tight dresses leading men out of room post-sex, shots of strippers, shots of girls whose only job is to look pretty for the men that own them in this world.

This movie does not end with Gloria taking a gun and shooting all of Esparza’s men in revenge, as well as every other horny guy there. She uses the gun on the Chief of Police, someone who canonically has taken advantage of and slept with who knows how many desperate girls simply because he can, someone who has groped not only Gloria but multiple girls throughout the film. She uses the gun on Lino Esparza, the man in charge of the sex trafficking ring that took her best friend, the man who tried to groom, abuse, and use her, the man who killed Isabel without a second thought because sometimes “sacrifices need to be made.”

And that’s it.

Once Lino is dead, Gloria grabs Suzu and they immediately surrender to the police.

I think that’s why many people (specifically all the old white guy reviewers on Rotten Tomatoes #I’MJUSTSAYING) don’t like this film. It was advertised as that big macho man movie except ohhhhh DUDE it has Gina Rodriguez in a tight red dress DUUUUUUUUDE!!!

Gloria is never objectified for the audience’s sake. She is objectified by the men in the film because that is the point-these men underestimate her and think they can own her, and they cannot.

Why?

Because of female friendship. Gloria’s quest to find Suzu is what drives her, and she never, ever wavers. When she shoots the Chief of Police, she is also shooting the man who would have forced Suzu to sleep with him if she’d won the pageant. When she shoots Lino, she is also shooting the man who sold her friend like a collectible trinket.

Despite being advertised as a big, violent movie with GUNS!, guns are never glorified in the way it was maybe advertised. Lino loves his weapons of course, but again, Gloria only uses it to bring two of her and Suzu’s and many, many women’s abusers down. Then, she drops it. She doesn’t need it anymore. In an age where there are violent shootings every day in the US, I admire this movie for not painting it as some kind of saving grace for Gloria-it was a tool to save her and her friend, and then, she was done.

There’s a lot of Lino dressing Gloria up and then staring at her while she just looks so, so, so very done

THE RELATIONSHIP

I have to talk a little about the Lino/Gloria relationship because I really appreciate the way it was handled.

It would have been incredibly easy to have some sort of “romantic” element added to it-Lino clearly at least lusts for her, and Gloria starts to see some sort of human side to him after he takes her to see his family.

However, it never went that direction, and I am so thankful for that.

Every scene with Lino and Gloria is kind of disgusting to some degree, which is exactly how it should be. He’s constantly staring at her, touching her, flat-out ordering her to strip, or messing with her hair. It’s never loving, it’s always possessive. And Gloria never reacts like maybe she wants it, ever-she’s always stone-faced and clearly trying not to like, scream. Maybe that’s just what I wanted to do.

Even when Gloria may start seeing some sort of good in him, this is immediately shattered by how easy it is for him to murder Isabel. This is a double-edged sword, because it was Gloria’s action of putting the tracking chip in Isabel’s phone (though granted, she did not know it was Isabel’s phone when she did it, she was on a time-limit) that led to her being labeled a traitor. But that’s all Lino needs to execute her, despite Gloria’s screams of protest. She begs to just be able to talk to him, maybe she can make him see sense, but Lino doesn’t let her, he wants her to be taken away where she can’t interfere.

This action solidifies Gloria’s feelings toward him. It SUCKS that Isabel dies, but in a way it’s necessary for Gloria to fully realize Lino as a monster. You could argue that the discovery of the link between Suzu and Lino also does this, but I think you have to build it gradually. Gloria’s furious at Lino, but she won’t do anything to him because her priority is Suzu. Once Suzu is found oh and also he’s the one in charge of that trafficking ring? Then all bets are off.

Basically, they could have added this Stockholm syndrome plotline to this, and I’m so glad they didn’t.

one of a couple different posters for the original movie

THE RE-IMAGINING

The poster above is one for the 2011 movie I mentioned earlier. It also got mixed reviews, but generally people seemed to like it, especially those people angry about this new movie.

I think because they share a title and a very, very basic plot connection, it’s easy to claim this 2019 movie is a remake, in which case it would be a very bad one. The main character is completely different and the Miss Baja California plotline is played way, WAY down.

Honestly, I don’t think it’s fair to call this film a remake-I would say it’s more of a re-imagining. Even the opening credits claim it’s inspired by the 2011 film, not based on.

Now, I haven’t seen the 2011 film, but from what I gather and see, the bullet imagery is played up a lot more in that film than this one. The point of that film is the infiltration of the beauty pageant-the point of this film is Gloria as a character and her friendship with Suzu. The pageant is never the point, merely a side thing.

Anyway, you’re welcome to do what you want of course, I just generally don’t think it’s fair to compare these two films since honestly, they seem to be very different. Should the 2019 film have been named something different, then? I mean yeah, maybe. But like The Power of Friendship sounds like a My Little Pony movie, so…

LOOK. AT. THAT. DRESS.

“OOF” MOMENT

Again, every scene where Lino touched Gloria just was GROSS and EW but we gotta give this one to the ending where Gloria is suddenly recruited by the CIA?????

Um…I mean cool she deserves it but also WHAT.

FAVORITE MOMENT

When Gloria found Suzu and gave her the friendship bracelet she’d been holding on to to show her that she’d been looking for her this whole time I JUST THEY LOVE EACH OTHER SO MUCH I SUPPORT THEM.

same poster again because I couldn’t find an alternate one? Did they make any?

SHOULD YOU TAKE YOURSELF TO THIS MOVIE?

So listen-it’s honestly tough for me to recommend this movie. I saw a review that called it “genre-defying” and I agree with that. It’s hard to place this movie because it’s so…not what people thought. And that’s not a bad thing, at least for me. I did like it, and I loved the direction it took, but the violence is tough to watch. Again, I feel like it’s meant to be because it’s not directed as entertaining action scenes, which is good. It’s appropriately horrific, but that doesn’t make it any easier to watch.

Still, the violence is not the entire movie. Gina Rodriguez absolutely steals the show and does amazing, and it’s so, so satisfying when she finds Suzu and wins. If you like typical action thrillers, you may not like this film. But if you like character-driven, tense films where the bad guys DEFINITELY LOSE and the good girls are incredible AND WIN, then I think you might like this one. Above all else, I think it does have a good story with great characters, and again, a very satisfying ending (prior to the CIA recruitment because that was just waaaaaay out of left field).

As a whole, I give this film…

3/5 FRIENDSHIP BRACELETS!!!!

Because we all know it, that friendship bracelet was a much bigger symbol to the film than a bullet, despite both film title and advertising.

TRAILERS TO WATCH OUT FOR

You would think that by now I’ve seen the Pet Sematary trailer enough to know and prepare for that stupid truck jumpscare in the beginning. I’m not, though. Lots of repeat trailers for this movie, but our new contenders are: Captain Marvel, which I will absolutely be seeing. I mean, Marvel finally giving a female superhero their own movie???? I’M THERE. Plus I would die for Brie Larson, much like I would die for Gina Rodriguez. Cold Pursuit looks…meh. It was so hard to tell what the movie was even about from the trailer, it was just like “LOOK! LIAM NEESON! Also explosions! Cars in trees! Loud noises! Excitement! LIAM NEESON AGAIN!” so um…right now it’s a no from me, unless there’s some incredible plot or I hear good things. But. Meh. And then there was Brightburn, which when I was taking notes in my phone I actually wrote “Brightburn what the GUCK” and I didn’t correct it because that feels a lot more accurate to how I feel about it. I mean, we’ve all been spammed with trailers for The Prodigy, and now this looks like almost the same film except the kid is like an evil..alien? I guess? That stupid jumpscare at the end though. Nope.

And that does it for this review!

Is Miss Bala a great movie? Not really. But I can appreciate and like things about it, and if you think you can too, I recommend taking yourself to the movies to see Miss Bala.

Or if you just wanna see Gina Rodriguez walk around in that dress with explosions in the background because honestly, price of admission, right there.

Glass Review

I really love everything about this poster especially because it tells you absolutely nothing about the movie, you think you know what’s going to happen?? YOU’RE WRONG

So yesterday, I took myself to the movies and saw Glass, M. Night Shyamalamalan’s (spelling?) latest mind-bending WHAT-IS-HAPPENING movie and also the sequel to both 2000’s Unbreakable and 2016’s Split.

Now when I saw Split, the big twist ending (shoving Bruce Willis in there to reveal that Split and Unbreakable are in the same cinematic universe, the Shyamaverse?) was kind of lost on me as I never saw Unbreakable. I loved Split, however, so I caught up and learned as much as I could about both films and their respective universes to prepare for Glass.

I still don’t think I was prepared enough. I mean what is it with movies this year and saying “oh?? you want a twist? Okay yeah. OH WHAT’S THAT?? MORE TWISTS????? OH LOOK HERE’S ANOTHER ONE!!!! TWISTS FOR EVERYONE!!!!!!”

That’s not a bad thing either!! At least I don’t think so. A good twist (or seventeen) really makes you think AND makes you want to watch the film again to look for clues you missed. It’s diabolical really.

So without further ado, let’s break open this “comic book” movie and shatter everything you thought you knew about this universe.

Pun game still strong.

They put Sarah Paulson in this dramatic white raincoat so it would give you the illusion of everything being fine, guys, Sarah Paulson the angel is here

THE PLOT

We begin approximately three-ish weeks after the events of Split, but that’s not the important timeline detail for you to remember: just as Glass is coming out 19 years after Unbreakable, this movie’s events take place 19 years after Unbreakable’s events. While this INCREDIBLY cool music plays, we go back and forth between following David Dunn (Bruce Willis) in his trademark rain poncho and Kevin Wendell Crumb (James McAvoy) in his…kidnap factory. The usual. David is in a bit of a vigilante routine at this point (his cover is “I’m taking a walk”) but we see he’s in headphone contact with his son, Joseph Dunn (Spencer Treat Clark), while he walks. After taking down two punks who contributed nothing to the plot or society, we learn that Dunn & Son are trying to track down the person/persons responsible for all the kidnapped girls recently. David runs into Hedwig (one of Crumb’s personalities) on the street and gets a vision of the latest group of girls, leading David to track down the factory where the girls are being kept alone, despite his son’s wishes. David manages to free the girls, but he runs into The Beast (another Crumb personality) and the two have an eeeepic battle in the factory. It does lead to one of the girls being whacked by a table (although I guess all she gets is a broken arm?? They try to use this against David later but like if he hadn’t done anything she’d be Beast food????) and both David and The Beast breaking through a window to fall to the ground below, where suddenly somehow there are police cars and guys with guns surrounding them and Sarah Paulson telling everyone not to shoot. Through the headphone microphone, Joseph hears where they are taking his father and Crumb and he learns it’s a psychiatric facility.

Finally there we see Samuel L. Jackson’s Elijah Price (or as we better know him, Mr. Glass). Sarah Paulson plays Dr. Ellie Staple, and her job is to convince our three misfits that they actually have a very specific disorder that causes them to BELIEVE they are superhuman, when in actuality, they’re not, just normal people who are a little broken (GET IT??? IT’S CALLED GLASS???? SYMBOLISM!!).

The rest of the movie is a test on both the characters and the audience as everyone is forced to review what they know about these characters and if it is, in fact, all a lie, and what they’re going to do about it.

Bruce Willis just looked completely done the entire movie and honestly what a 2019 mood

THE REVIEW

Generally, Glass appears to be getting mixed reviews. There are people who loved Unbreakable and didn’t like Split so they don’t know what to make of this movie, there are people who loved both and had their own ideas for this movie and then were collectively disappointed and miffed when those ideas didn’t happen, there are people who hate the entire film but are still in awe of James McAvoy’s incredible, INCREDIBLE acting and his ability to flip from one character to an entirely different one in a matter of seconds. For me personally? I really, really loved it. And I love it more the more I think about it (as we discussed with Escape Room, my favorite movies are ones that make me think about them afterwards!). I thought it was frustrating and poignant in powerful ways, and heartfelt when it needed to be. We’ll get to the characters later, but it was incredible to feel myself questioning why I was rooting for the “bad guys.” Were they really the bad guys in the end? I was questioning everything the whole way through and I LOVED IT.

Every detail felt carefully placed, from the music to the color to the camerawork. It was a distressing ending on one hand but an empowering ending on the other. It was funny when it needed to be, heartbreaking when it needed to be, suspenseful when it needed to be, and made me want to punch Sarah Paulson in the face. And I love Sarah Paulson!

Okay, time to go into further details so SPOILER WARNING if you haven’t seen the movie yet!! And this is a Shyamalan film, so you know there’s a twist. Or, like I said earlier, a whole lot of twists. If you’re on the fence about the movie but you liked Split or Unbreakable and generally like Shyamalan films or this sounds like something you’d enjoy, I recommend seeing it first before reading further. If the details don’t bother you and you’re okay being spoiled before you see it, read on!

*insert mandatory “I’m here to talk to you about the Avengers Initiative” joke*

THE MUSIC

YOU GUYS. THE MUSIC. THE MUSIC!!!

Ohhhhhh MAN the music was great! It was so strange and anxiety-inducing when appropriate, and then it would switch and suddenly be really heartfelt and sad and you were sitting there like “whY aM I cRYinG??” Apparently the composer, West Dylan Thordson (also composer for Split) also mixed in some key themes from Unbreakable so it fully was a cinematic universe down to even the music?? I just. UGH. I can’t say enough about it. Even the track titles fill me with emotion (I mean, “Kevin & Casey”?? REALLY. WHY WOULD YOU DO THIS.)

Notable music moments include the opening track with the montage and anxiety and opening credits flitting all over the screen, it was an experience, the moment when David is slumped over in his room remembering moments from Unbreakable but questioning his powers, the big parking lot showdown, and of course that entire finale piece. And again, the finale piece is called “Origin Story” which is like oh, look, I’m crying again.

why would you do this, Sarah, WHYYYY

THE CHARACTERS

Absolutely one of my favorite elements of this movie and this TRILOGY have been the characters. Mr. Glass and David are PERFECT foils to each other, and the way that Kevin is revealed to be connected to them both is just heartbreaking. None of them are perfect by any means, of course: Elijah is a genius mass murderer, Kevin is a broken kidnapper/cannibal (does it count as cannibalism if it’s The Beast personality?), and even David is weak, quick to believe Ellie, and often acts without thinking (okay not as bad as the other two BUT the point is none of them are perfect superheroes, okay). All the characters are tied into the overall symbolism of the film: when you look at them through lenses (Mr. Glass as the genius evil mastermind, Kevin as his beastly underling, David as the superhero, Ellie as the caring, reality-driven psychiatrist, Joseph as the starstruck little boy, Casey as the battered final girl, and Mrs. Price as the mother of a mistake), you do not and cannot get the full picture. Elijah has only ever wanted a body that could keep up with his intellect, and if you were in his situation, wouldn’t you? Kevin’s personalities developed as a way to protect him from his incredibly abusive mother. David has massive survivor’s guilt both because of the train incident AND his wife is dead now too. Ellie is blinded by her belief that what she’s doing is right. Joseph never saw his father as JUST a superhero but as a whole person. Casey put her uncle behind bars and genuinely cares for Kevin as a kindred spirit; she is not happy about outliving him, or about him being caught initially in the first place. She is not hiding her scars from the world anymore! Mrs. Price loves Elijah and believes he is capable of good, but the world was not good to him.

There are so many sides to every character, not just Kevin with his multiple personalities. You initially want to feel one way about them because of how they’re presented, but as the movie goes on, you realize you can’t do that. These are not two-dimensional characters on a screen, these are whole, broken people in awful situations, and aren’t we all? We cannot dehumanize any of them. Even Ellie, after the horrid reveal, breaks down in a hallway and screams, showing she is not as perfectly put together as she seems. She’s scared, and angry, and human.

I could go on forever, I really could. But really, hats off to Shyamalan for characters that are so well-developed. You want them to do well, and it breaks you when they don’t. When they can’t.

After you see the movie, seeing this room just makes you cry all over again

THE ART

I have to talk about the scenery, costumes, and general design all in one category because it all connects together and tbh visually this film is absolutely a work of art.

One of my favorite elements of The Sixth Sense is the use of color, and in that film, it was the bright red seen throughout that gave clues. Color plays an equally important role in this film, and it goes from bright, to muted, to bright again, and then finally to just what I would call rich. It mirrors the mental and emotional state of our characters, it gives visual cues, it sets up Ellie as a sweet, caring pastel individual when really she is full of evil, so on and so forth.

Every character, as seen in the shot above, has a specific color that is kind of theirs. It was also used in another theatrical poster for the film. Elijah’s color being purple is something that carried over from Unbreakable; it’s a color of royalty and power. Kevin’s color is kind of a mustard yellow, and it’s very reminiscent of Split, with the sickly lighting of the zoo facility and the bright fall leaves of Casey’s hunting memories. David’s color is interestingly enough a sort of teal, which mixes both the idea of blue being both a “hero” and “good” color psychologically to the fact that his weakness is water. He’s constantly surrounded by the very thing that haunts him.

IT’S JUST

Ellie’s color is a pastel pink, although she really just keeps a pastel color palette throughout the film (when she’s not wearing stark white). It makes her seem gentle and like she truly wants the best for our three misfits, which makes it all the more frustrating when she seems to be torturing them instead and then oh, wait, yeah no she’s completely evil. Great.

Though the use of color is the most obvious artistic aspect to the film, the camerawork is also incredible. There are multiple scenes where the camera takes the viewpoint of Mr. Glass, so we see everything from his point of view (sometimes even tilted slightly since his head seems to be permanently flopped over when he’s sedated). There’s a moment where Joseph storms out of the hospital and the camera follows him, flipping upside-down and around to show Joseph’s mental state-is everything he knows, everything he so strongly believes in, really a lie?

There are extreme closeups, reflections, a strong emphasis on the visual of shattered glass, again, I could go on and on and on and on, and I still probably wouldn’t catch everything.

This is why I love watching The Sixth Sense, Unbreakable, and Split multiple times-it’s a layered cinematic experience, and you catch something new every single time. I will absolutely be adding Glass to this list (even though that will mean crying a lot more).

Pictured: three wholesome beans who need protection from this world

THE TWIST(S)

Because it ain’t a Shyamalan movie if there ain’t a TWIST.

Or like 12 billion.

I guess the initial twist is that Elijah has been switching his medication and only pretending to be sedated, but that’s an early-on reveal and COME ON, did any of us really think he was letting them sedate him??? It’s Mr. Glass, y’all. Let’s be real. (“let’s be real” she says about…a movie character who is fictional).

There’s an interesting semi-twist where the audience, just like the characters, may be starting to believe that there truly is nothing supernatural about them-they’re just normal, if broken. It’s sad, man, but fear not-they actually ARE superhumans! The Beast IS real, Elijah IS a genius, and David really IS unbreakable. Hoorah!

The next twist serves to further connect all three characters: Kevin’s father, who was Kevin’s role model, and who left Kevin alone with his mother with no explanation which meant ~time for multiple personalities and lots of abuse~, actually DIED. And not only that, he was ON THE SAME TRAIN DAVID DUNN WAS ON IN UNBREAKABLE.

Mr. Glass, like he says in the film, created both Kevin as The Beast and David as the superhero.

WhaaaAAAAAAAAAAT!

And now you’re thinking cool! So that’s how they’re all connected, and how they’ve been all connected! Where can we go from here? Will they show the world they exist?? HOW EPIC WILL IT BE???

aaaaaaaand then they’re dead.

No.

Really.

Kevin starts us off by revenge-crushing Mr. Glass’s shoulder and punching him in the ribs. He then falls out of his chair, unable to hold himself up, and with each impact you hear his bones breaking (GET IT BECAUSE THE MOVIE IS CALLED GLASS??? GET IT????). He crawls over to his mother, who sits with him while he coughs up blood, I’m assuming from his ribs breaking and puncturing various organs. It’s…yeah.

Kevin still wants to fight David, but Casey gets to Kevin and manages to talk The Beast down. YEAH. She hugs him and asks Kevin to “stay in the light with her for a little while” (CATCH ME CRYING IN THE CLUB). The Beast becomes Kevin, and just when you think everything’s fine, Casey notices a red laser light on her shoulder, and when she turns to look, the light is now on Kevin, and he gets shot. The shooter, we see, has some kind of black clover tattoo on the inside of his wrist. Kevin collapses in Casey’s arms, various personalities say goodbye to her or talk about pain (Hedwig in particular asks Casey to make the pain stop and you hear that sound? That’s my heart breaking). Finally, Kevin comes back into the light and says he’ll stay in the light till the end. He dies in Casey’s arms.

David is pulled aside by a group of masked awful terrible people who start holding his head down in a pothole of water. Ellie comes up and asks David to take her hand, where he gets a vision of her in a creepy dining room with other creepy evil people. She says that in the comic books there’s always some evil organization trying to stop everyone-but they’re not like that. They’re not evil. They’re just right. This means that the ENTIRE DAMN TIME she was being sweet to them and gently trying to convince them they have a disorder, she KNEW that they actually WERE SUPERHUMAN and she was just TORTURING THEM. David notices that Ellie also has the black clover tattoo. Ellie walks away and the masked people finish drowning David. We later see Joseph, who was separated from his dad, running to his dad’s body and sobbing.

We cut back one last time to Elijah, talking with his mother. It was a little hard to make out, but Elijah and his mom are discussing his life being a limited release, and she doesn’t know how it ends because he never told her. Elijah simply says that no, this was never a limited release…it was an origin story.

So that’s it, right? Our three misfits are dead, and the supervillain got away with EVERYTHING.

Except NOPE.

WE AIN’T DONE YET.

Ellie goes back to her secret black clover tattoo society of evil declaring that everything is fine, and she’ll move on to the next city and do the same thing all over again. The entire movie, our three misfits have been questioning “why are we the only ones??” and now we know why-there have been more, there are more, Ellie’s just finishing them off. Before she leaves, Ellie stops in a comic book store (perhaps to gloat?) and overhears some comics fans discussing the mastermind trope. They say that the mastermind always has a real plan behind a fake one-and no one sees it coming.

Ellie realizes that there may be something to this, so she goes back to the hospital to make sure that all security footage of the misfits has been erased. The guy working there says yeah for sure, except oh NO Mr. Glass is a genius you FOOLS. Mr. Glass downloaded the security footage along with a monologue of sorts and sent it to his mother, who (I’m assuming) sends it to both Joseph and Casey. The three meet up and sit together in a train station (BECAUSE TRAINS!!! UNBREAKABLE!!!) and watch as the footage goes viral. The superhuman truth is out there now-people know they exist.

And other superhumans may realize they’re not alone.

Ellie realizes that this was Mr. Glass’s plan all along. It’s interesting to note that during the final battle, Glass refers to Casey, Joseph, and Mrs. Price as “the main characters’ entrance” when they arrive. Because remember, it’s not a limited edition-it’s an origin story.

cAtcH mE CRyiNg iN tHE CLuB

“OOF” MOMENT

The only real “awkward” scene for me (there is an unfortunate lack of crazy dance scene from Hedwig, although he has a rollerskating scene) is in the beginning when Ellie and her soldiers interrupt The Beast’s and David’s fight. How…did they find them?? How did they get set up to surround them so perfectly??? I just…what?

The entire ending death montage is absolutely heartbreaking and I hate it, but the other real gutting moment is after that meeting in the pink room when Ellie got into their heads and we see David just crouched in a corner of his room all broken and sad and doubting and I just Bruce Willis looks so old and sad here I just please give the man a hug please.

FAVORITE MOMENT

Honestly there are so many good ones, but one that totally stands out is the first time Casey comes to visit and she talks with the various personalities and we see that her touch is incredibly healing to Kevin and that’s also when she says she put her uncle behind bars for what he did to her and just YES GIRL. YES.

Also the scene where Ellie realizes she’s lost is INCREDIBLY satisfying.

SHOULD YOU TAKE YOURSELF TO THIS MOVIE?

If you read this and think it sounds interesting, if you like Shyamalan movies, if you like pretty movies, if you like movies with an uplifting ending after all hope seems lost, if you like the actors, or if you just wanna marvel at James McAvoy’s incredible work with every one of his characters, I say go for it and take yourself to this movie! If this doesn’t sound like it’s something you’d enjoy, I don’t think it’s a movie you need to see. I think it’s a great movie and I really, really enjoyed it, but I also think it’s not necessarily for everyone! But in general, I give this movie:

4.5/5 COLOR-CODED SHARDS OF GLASS!

Yes everyone meet our new rating system! It’ll change depending on the movie, of course. If it’s a movie I think EVERYONE should see regardless of it being your cup of tea or not, I’ll give it that coveted 5/5 somethings.

This movie didn’t quite make it there, but I still think it’s quite good and I recommend giving it a try! You’ll cry a lot. And laugh a little! And want to punch Sarah Paulson.

(I still love her)

TRAILERS TO WATCH OUT FOR

We had a couple repeats (Pet Sematary, Miss Bala, and Happy Death Day 2 U) which we’ve discussed already, but we got some new ones to look out for! The Best of Enemies looks amazing, it’ll definitely be an emotional rollercoaster, but like an important one. Plus we know overall how it ends because of history, so the ending can’t be too sad hopefully please I have no more tears. Fighting with My Family actually…looks really good??? I was so skeptical because the poster made it look just weird and like another The Rock flick filled with explosions and bad CGI, BUT this looks surprisingly heartfelt and funny and like…good?? Us looks AMAZING. It was so fun to see the trailer on the bigscreen for the first time! I mean don’t get me wrong, I’m TERRIFIED and that movie will give me nightmares for YEARS probably, but I’m hoping Jordan Peele can give us another social thriller filled with great characters and things to make you THINK. And also lots of jumpscares probably which like not my favorite, but I’ll try it for Jordan Peele. The one trailer that made me just flat out say NOPE was The Curse of La Llorona. It has the potential I’m sure to be a fascinating urban legend-based horror, but that was the MOST ANXIETY-INDUCING TRAILER IN THE WORLD THAT IS EVERY CHILD’S WORST NIGHTMARE PLEASE GET THEM OUT OF THAT CAR. PLEASE.

And that about does it for this review of Glass! I’m sure I’ll find more and more I love or maybe even dislike about it as time goes on, but I’ll say it again, if this sounds like something you’d enjoy, might even like, or you just wanna see James McAvoy play 20+ characters and switch between them in an instant, I recommend taking yourself to the movies to see Glass!

Escape Room (2019) Review

Despite the poster, there is a surprising lack of jigsaw puzzles in this movie. Or skeletons, actually.

So this morning, I took myself to the movies and saw Escape Room, which I’ve been curious about since the trailers were released. I love the idea of escape rooms, I’ve played through The Room and all its sequels multiple times, give me some good ol’ puzzle solving and I am SO there! While I was expecting some scares, I was hoping there wouldn’t be anything too gruesome since it does carry a PG-13 rating. Hopefully there would be more clever atmospheric scares than gory death scenes, and I was right!

(Fun fact: did you know that there were two movies that came out in 2017 also called Escape Room? I didn’t until I was trying to find pictures for this movie! Apparently, those two movies are…not great, though I can’t personally vouch for them.)

THE PLOT

Escape Room starts off in, funnily enough, an escape room! It initially looks like a lavishly decorated living room, and all is calm until Logan Miller drops through the ceiling. He’s limping, beat-up, and in full-on panic mode as he hobbles to a complicated looking number-maze-lock thing on the door. He realizes that he needs four numbers, but as soon as he pulls on the 1, the wall opposite him starts closing in. Great. We’re right there with him as he struggles to look for clues to find the four numbers needed as more and more of the beautiful room gets destroyed and crushed behind him. He finds the four numbers needed, so he thinks, but they don’t work, and we watch as he slowly gets crushed…..

…..and then we flashback to three days prior. Here we meet three of our main characters, Zoey (played by Taylor Russell), Jason (played by Jay Ellis), and of course, Ben (played by Logan Miller). Please note that Ben seems slightly more put together here, as in, he’s not being crushed in an escape room…yet. These three characters are vastly different from each other, and they each receive a mysterious puzzle box from someone they know. The puzzle box leads them to Minos Escape Rooms with the promise of ~fabulous cash prizes~ if they can solve the unsolvable escape room. It is here we meet our other three main cast members: Danny (played by Nik Dodani), Mike (played by Tyler Labine), and Amanda (played by Deborah Ann Woll). After Ben presumably breaks the doorknob in the waiting room, the six unfortunates discover that the waiting room IS the escape room, and the game has begun. The rest of the movie is, you guessed it, an escape room! We learn throughout the rest of the film more about the characters and why they were chosen for this deadly game through eerily specific details in all the rooms, and also, who sent them here in the first place?

There’s a lot of really morbid puzzle-solving. Like, a lot.

it’s like if the Annabelle doll grew up and started working for escape rooms

THE REVIEW

This movie is really, really fun. That feels wrong to say about a “psychological horror-thriller,” but I swear it is fun. In my opinion, the movie does a fascinating job of revealing minor character details throughout without dropping the big twist until the right moment. I love things like this where you feel like you have to pay attention to every detail otherwise you’ll miss something and honestly maybe you should watch it again to really get everything?? I live for stuff like that. It was distressing because of what was happening and exhilarating when something finally went right. I really enjoyed it as a whole, and I think my opinion of the movie got even better the more I thought about it afterwards. Those are my favorite kinds of films-the ones that make you think about them afterwards.

Now it’s time to escape into the next room of this review, (I dunno if I’ll be able to keep up the pun game for every review, fam) so Spoiler Warning now in effect, and I really recommend for this movie that you see it first completely blind to any spoilers or major plot details!

this room? This room right here?? This is the worst room, hands down

THE MUSIC

The music for this film was really unique when I noticed it, and it’s one reason I want to watch it again, because I’m sure there were notable music moments I missed. The score really set the stage for uneasiness and suspense, and it reminded me of the music played in every movie where someone’s trying to hack into a computer under a time limit. You know the one. Notable music moments include the opening song that sets the room we see Ben fall into, the song that plays during the montage of Ben, Jason, and Zoey trying to solve their puzzle boxes, the end credits music, and of course, that AWFUL distorted rendition of Petula Clark’s “Downtown” that plays as a timer in the upside-down Pool Room, pictured above. Bad room. Worst room. Hate it.

Zoey is all that is pure and good in the universe

THE CHARACTERS

Overall, there were a lot of likable characters in Escape Room, which is kind of unfortunate because many of them don’t, well, escape. All the characters were unique, and I appreciated how each of them had different reactions to the stressors in each room, according to their character. Zoey is my absolute favorite, she was a delight to watch the entire film, and I so appreciated her being the absolute brainiac of the group. More genius WOC roles in movies, please!! There was also a great character arc for Ben, which I really, really enjoyed, and there was a lot of heart given to both Mike and Amanda as well. Unfortunately, Danny isn’t around long enough to really be developed, and Jason turns out to be a survivalist asshole with quite a superiority complex. But generally, you felt for all the characters, and you wanted to see them escape, which meant that their death scenes generally hit you just as hard as they hit the survivors. Danny’s death is a shocker for all of them, especially Ben, and the way Amanda’s death hits Zoey is heartbreaking to watch but it puts Zoey into hardcore survivor badass mode, which is pretty great. This does mean, however, that Zoey is determined to bring down the corrupt AF corporation behind Minos Escape Rooms, which cool, but also based off that last scene, NOOOOOOOOO!!

This scene tricks you into thinking everyone will be fine

THE SCENERY

Now when I first saw the trailer for Escape Room, I thought that each room would be designed for one of the characters specifically. That’s not actually the case, but each room is drastically different and incredibly deadly, with character-specific details woven-throughout. They’re all designed in such a way that you could see them being a legitimate escape room in the real world, except they all have some kind of ACTUAL deadly twist, as opposed to actors and fake consequences. The little details were really clever and sometimes kind of heart-wrenching. The fire and closed-off vent crawl triggered Amanda’s PTSD in a really gutting scene and introduction to her character. The antler trophies in the room pictured above each represented one of the well-known reindeer from the “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer” song, which was rough for Ben because of his flashback and rough for the audience because that is clearly insinuating that the reindeer have been slaughtered which like, rude, leave Christmas out of this?? My least favorite room is the arctic winter awfulness simply because it was devastating watching them work together to both deal with Danny’s death and try to melt the key needed out of the center of a solid block of ice while they’re sharing ONE coat among them. Ugh. But a very close second is that stupid upside-down pool room. Design-wise it’s great, but overall? Hate it. Hate what happens. Nope.

Oh hey look! There are skeletons in this movie!

THE TWIST

Okay, if you’ve read this far and haven’t seen the movie yet, trust me when I say you really probably wanna see it first before I continue.

For everyone else? Here we go.

Escape Room has actually, a couple twists when you think about it. The initial twist is, of course, the fact that all the dangerous traps are actually real and very deadly. The stakes are REAL high.

The next twist comes in the room outfitted like a hospital. Each character is drawn to a specific bed, set up differently. It turns out, each character spent time at some point in the hospital, and each bed is a perfect recreation of their room. Through discussion, they learn that each of them was the sole survivor of something traumatic that happened to them (we get little flashes about what these events could be throughout the film). Zoey figures out that whoever is running the escape room must want to see who, among them, is the “luckiest of the lucky.”

After a couple more rooms and a couple more deaths, we catch up with Ben, who did indeed survive getting crushed in the lavish living room (so I guess technically he just didn’t get crushed). He hobbles into some sort of warehouse with a large screen that shows each of their pictures, and all of them, save for his, have a large red “X” over top. In his picture, he is labeled the “WINNER.” A bearded British man enters the room to reveal the next twist: this entire thing was set up by a group of bored, rich people who are fascinated by the human will to survive. British Beard proclaims that humans have always loved watching other humans in near-death situations, and they have run these escape rooms multiple times, sort of like an experiment, to try and figure out what it is that makes up the ultimate winner (sidenote: notice how this is also kind of a dig at the audience to the film? After all, aren’t we also paying to watch humans survive in impossible situations for entertainment? Granted, it’s all acting, but still…). It’s a very Hunger Games-esque twist, and British Beard boredly states that he really didn’t think Ben would be the one to make it out, his money was on one of the more fit characters (um, rude?). Ben, absolutely bruised and battered beyond belief at this point, just wants the prize money. All his new friends are dead, and he should probably go to a hospital.

The next twist comes when British Beard says something like “when a horse wins a race, does it get the prize?” and then he tries to choke Ben to death with a wire. Ben is able to get out of the choke hold by taking a piece of wood out of his leg and stabbing British Beard. It still looks like British Beard will be the ultimate victor until…

BAM he gets shot in the back by our next twist: Zoey didn’t die after all! They make sure British Beard can’t follow them and they hobble out into the sunlight.

We ain’t done yet, though, as Zoey is later seen with a group of police officers, headed in to the Minos building to take down the corporation. However, when they bust down the door, it just looks like an abandoned warehouse, with decaying furniture everywhere and graffiti smothering the walls. Zoey, panicked, points out that no, no, this was the lobby! And the vent was right there! And-

She notices that there’s a specific phrase graffiti-ed over the “vent”: “NO WAY OUT” which, she figures out, is an anagram for “WOOTAN YU”, the name of the doctor that’s been splashed all over the movie and, theoretically, the evil mastermind behind all this. Zoey realizes that even THIS is a part of the game!

We STILL AIN’T DONE THOUGH, and we jump ahead to 6 months later, where Zoey and a very cleaned-up Ben are meeting for coffee (they’re sweet and I love them). Ben would very much like to leave everything behind, please, but Zoey refuses. She found headlines explaining away the deaths of all the previous characters, and she’s convinced they would have had headlines, too. They weren’t supposed to win, and they did. Zoey is able to track down what she believes to be the coordinates to Minos headquarters, saying she has plane tickets, let’s go. Ben agrees. GET IT.

STILL. NOT. DONE. We cut to a plane that appears to have lost an engine, but wait, it’s another escape room? The flight attendant and a man on board frantically search for numbers and a key to get into the cockpit, but when they do, the pilots are knocked out, and there’s no way to control the plane, and they crash….

in a SIMULATOR. The flight attendant complains about getting her shoe stuck on something AGAIN, ugh, and the fake plane resets while various people in hazmat suits walk around looking creepy. A silhouette on a screen asks about the survival rate, and a smug guy says “4%. We have their flight info.”

It’s a brilliant setup for a sequel (please, PLEASE give me Zoey punching the living daylights out of this Dr. Wootan Yu, PLEASE!!!) and a creepy reminder that, just like Zoey said, they weren’t supposed to win, and technically? They still haven’t.

(sidenote: does anyone else think the flight attendant looks suspiciously like Zoey’s roommate who goes home for the holidays?? ARE THEY ALL IN ON IT???)

this is a totally normal escape room guys, I swear

“OOF” MOMENT

Honestly, I really didn’t think there was a particularly awkward or cheesy moment in the film. However, I will mention both Danny’s death and Mike’s death in particular, because they’re infuriating and real hard to watch. Plus it absolutely breaks Ben both times and I just…please help him. Get him a blanket and like, a cozy book or something. Also, initially the “NO WAY OUT” twist drove me crazy because?? LET THEM BE HAPPY, PLEASE.

FAVORITE MOMENT

Hands down, I have to give this to Zoey. We assume she dies due to the poison being released in the air, but in a fun moment, two guys in hazmat suits come into the room, talking about cleaning up the bodies, and they see an oxygen mask. When one of them says “pfft an oxygen mask? What would she use that for?” Zoey appears behind him with a pole and yells “TO BREATHE, BITCH!” and absolutely whacks him so she can escape. I LOVE HER.

nah I’m good thanks

SHOULD YOU TAKE YOURSELF TO THIS MOVIE?

This is another one that I think is entirely up to you! If you like escape rooms, crazy puzzles, good characters, fun twists, and a decent thriller, I say go for it! If it’s not your genre, no worries. I’m not super into crazy gory thrillers myself, and we don’t see any gory death scenes (the exception might be Jason, there’s some blood there, and British Beard gets shot a couple of times). I would say there IS a seizure warning for one of the rooms: when Ben and Jason enter the TV static room, the rest of the scene plays out with a whole lot of strobe light and weird camera effects. It’s kind of tough to watch in general, so be warned!

TRAILERS TO WATCH OUT FOR

Many of the trailers were similar to Aquaman (Miss Bala, Pet Sematary, Godzilla: King of the Monsters), but they added Happy Death Day 2 U (similar to Pet Sematary, probably won’t see it alone if I do see it) and The Intruder (which I probably just won’t see in general, not really my jam, unless I hear it has some amazing plot thing that wasn’t featured in the jump-scare-y trailer. Sheesh, between this and Pet Sematary, when are people gonna learn to just not move into weird old houses?? STOP IT).

And that’s the end of this review! If you like mystery thrillers with deadly puzzles, good characters, and a whole LOT of twists, I’d say give this one a go! It’s not a groundbreaking movie, per se, but I think it’s enjoyable and interesting, and I keep wondering about the details I probably missed! So if that sounds like something you’d like, I say take yourself to the movies and see Escape Room.

(2019, not either of the 2017 versions. Unless that sounds like something you’d enjoy, of course.)